Lumen Apposing Metal Stents With and Without a Double Pigtail Stent in Pancreatic Collections

September 12, 2017 updated by: JOAN B GORNALS, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Lumen Apposing Metal Stents With and Without a Coaxial Double Pigtail Stent in the Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

The study evaluates the security of LAMS with ando without a coaxial double pigtail plastic stent in the management of pancreatic fuid collections.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) represented a great improvement in the EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). It is postulated safer than other types of stents due to the presence of bilateral anchoring flanges, designed to appose the stomach or duodenum to the PFC wall minimizing the risk of perforation or peritoneal leakage. In addition, the larger lumen diameter facilitates the drainage of PFC, specially the walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). However, secondary adverse effects such as infection due to complete or partial stent obstruction, migration, bleeding or buried LAMS syndrome have also been related . The placement of a coaxial double pigtail plastic within the LAMS has been reported beneficial in order to avoid external migration or the lumen obstruction and to the prevention of bleeding and other adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LAMS with and without a coaxial double pigtail plastic stent in the EUS-guided transmural drainage of PFCs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
        • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients wiht pancreatic fluid collections and indication for EUS-guided transmural drainage in accordance l wiht international creteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pancreatic fluid collections and indication of drainage.
  • EUS-guided trasmural drainage wiht lumen apposing metal stents.
  • Criteria for drainage were as specified by the Working Group of the International Association of Pancreatology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other types of collections and stents
  • Severe coagulopathy (protombin time > 1,5) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50 x 109/L)
  • PFCs with a previous attempt failed of EUS-guided transmural drainage
  • Age younger than 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
LAMS
EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen apposing metal stents.
EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen apposing metal stents
LAMS + pigtail
EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen apposing metal stents and a coaxial double pigtail stent
EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen apposing metal stents and a coaxial double pigtail stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Outcomes will be assessed 6 months after the inclusion of last patient.
Defined and graded according to the ASGE lexicon's severity grading system
Outcomes will be assessed 6 months after the inclusion of last patient.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joan Gornals, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The results of the stuydy will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Collection

Clinical Trials on LAMS

Subscribe