A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% on Actinic Keratosis on Face or Scalp (AK004)

February 16, 2021 updated by: Almirall, S.A.

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Efficacy and Safety Study of KX2-391 Ointment 1% in Adult Subjects With Actinic Keratosis on the Face or Scalp

This Phase III study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KX2-391 Ointment 1% in adult participants when applied to an area of skin containing 4-8 stable, clinically typical actinic keratosis (AK) lesions on the face or scalp.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study was a double-blinded, multicenter, efficacy, and safety study of KX2-391 ointment administered topically to the face or scalp of participants with AK.

The study consisted of Screening, Treatment, Follow-up, and Recurrence Follow-up Periods. Eligible participants received up to 5 consecutive days of topical treatment. Efficacy (lesion counts) and safety evaluations were performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

351

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Alliance Dermatology
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Synexus US
    • Arkansas
      • Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States, 71913
        • Burke Pharmaceutical Research
    • California
      • Murrieta, California, United States, 92562
        • Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
      • Oceanside, California, United States, 92056
        • Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92117
        • Skin Surgery Medical Group, Inc.
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95405
        • Synexus
    • Colorado
      • Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States, 80111
        • AboutSkin dermatology
    • Florida
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33437
        • Study Protocol, Inc
      • Miami Lakes, Florida, United States, 33016
        • Sweet Hope Research Specialty, Inc.
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33624
        • Forward Clinical Trials, Inc.
    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46256
        • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • DS Research
    • Louisiana
      • Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States, 70601
        • Clinical Trials of SWLA, LLC
    • Michigan
      • Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States, 48059
        • Hamzavi Dermatology
    • Missouri
      • Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States, 64506
        • Medisearch Clinical Trials
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States, 89052
        • Henderson Dermatology Research
    • New Hampshire
      • Portsmouth, New Hampshire, United States, 03801
        • ActivMed Practices & Research, Inc
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Union Square Laser Dermatology
    • Ohio
      • Dublin, Ohio, United States, 43016
        • Aventiv Research Inc.
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97223
        • Oregon Medical Research Center
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29407
        • Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37917
        • Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
      • Springfield, Tennessee, United States, 37072
        • Rivergate Dermatology Clinical Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • DermResearch
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
        • Suzanne Bruce and Associates, P.A., The Center for Skin Research
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc.
    • Virginia
      • Lynchburg, Virginia, United States, 24501
        • The Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Dermatology Associates of Seattle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Males and females greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years old.
  2. A defined area on the face or scalp contains 4 to 8 clinically typical, visible, and discrete AK lesions.
  3. Participants who in the judgment of the Investigator, were in good general health.
  4. Females were postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with at least 12 months of amenorrhea), surgically sterile (by hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or tubal ligation); or, if of childbearing potential, were using highly effective contraception for at least 30 days or 1 menstrual cycle, whichever was longer, prior to study treatment and agreed to continue to use highly effective contraception for at least 30 days following their last dose of study treatment. Highly effective contraception includes oral hormonal contraceptives, hormonal contraceptive implant, injection or patch, intrauterine device or complete abstinence from sexual intercourse.
  5. Sexually active males who had not had a vasectomy, and whose partner was reproductively capable, must had agreed to use barrier contraception from Screening through 90 days after their last dose of study treatment.
  6. All participants must had agreed not to donate sperm or eggs or attempt conception from Screening through 90 days following their last dose of study treatment.
  7. Willing to avoid excessive sun or ultraviolet exposure.
  8. Able to comprehend and were willing to sign the informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Clinically atypical and/or rapidly changing AK lesions on the treatment area.
  2. Location of the selected area is:

    • On any location other than the face or scalp.
    • Within 5 centimeters (cm) of an incompletely healed wound.
    • Within 5 cm of a suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
  3. Been previously treated with KX2-391 Ointment.
  4. Anticipated need for in-patient hospitalization or in-patient surgery from Day 1 to Day 57.
  5. Treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy, or other treatments for AK within the treatment area or within 2 cm of the treatment area, within 8 weeks prior to the Screening visit.
  6. Use of the following therapies and/or medications within 2 weeks prior to the Screening visit:

    • Cosmetic or therapeutic procedures (e.g., use of liquid nitrogen, surgical excision, curettage, dermabrasion, medium or greater depth chemical peel, laser resurfacing) within the treatment area or within 2 cm of the selected treatment area.
    • Acid-containing therapeutic products (eg, salicylic acid or fruit acids, such as alpha- and beta-hydroxyl acids and glycolic acids), topical retinoids, or light chemical peels within the treatment area or within 2 cm of the selected treatment area.
    • Topical salves (non-medicated/non-irritant lotion and cream were acceptable) or topical steroids within the treatment area or within 2 cm of the selected treatment area; artificial tanners within the treatment area or within 5 cm of the selected treatment area.
  7. Use of the following therapies and/or medications within 4 weeks prior to the Screening visit:

    • Treatment with immunomodulators (eg, azathioprine), cytotoxic drugs (eg, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, chlorambucil, methotrexate) or interferons/interferon inducers.
    • Treatment with systemic medications that suppress the immune system (eg, cyclosporine, prednisone, methotrexate, alefacept, infliximab).
  8. Use of systemic retinoids (eg, isotretinoin, acitretin, bexarotene) within 6 months prior to the Screening visit.
  9. A history of sensitivity and/or allergy to any of the ingredients in the study medication.
  10. A skin disease (e.g., atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, eczema) or condition (e.g., scarring, open wounds) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with the study conduct or evaluations, or which exposes the participant to unacceptable risk by study participation.
  11. Other significant uncontrolled or unstable medical diseases or conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would expose the participant to unacceptable risk by study participation.
  12. Females who were pregnant or nursing.
  13. Participated in an investigational drug trial during which an investigational study medication was administered within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational product, whichever was longer, before dosing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KX2-391 Ointment 1%
KX2-391 Ointment was applied once daily for 5 consecutive days on the face or scalp.
Dose: 1% (250 mg single-use packets); Dosage form: Ointment; Route of administration: Topical
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The Vehicle Ointment was applied once daily for 5 consecutive days on the face or scalp.
Dosage form: Ointment; Route of administration: Topical

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Complete (100%) Clearance of Actinic Keratosis (AK) Lesions
Time Frame: Day 57
Complete clearance rate was defined as the percentage of participants at Day 57 with no clinically visible AK lesions in the treatment area.
Day 57

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Partial Clearance Rate of Actinic Keratosis Lesions at Day 57
Time Frame: Day 57
Partial clearance rate of AK lesions was defined as the percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to (>=) 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions identified at Baseline (Day 1 predose) in the treatment area.
Day 57
Overall Change From Baseline in Actinic Keratosis Lesion Counts at Days 8, 15, 29 and 57
Time Frame: Days 8, 15, 29 and 57
Overall the change from baseline in lesion count at each visit were summarized and reported using descriptive statistics by treatment location (face or scalp).
Days 8, 15, 29 and 57
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Actinic Keratosis Lesions Who Achieved Complete Clearance at Day 57
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-Day 57
Recurrence rate was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier method, with recurrence define as appearance of any AK lesions in the treatment area, including those recurred or newly identified.
3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-Day 57
Number of Participants With Maximal Post Baseline Local Skin Reaction (LSR)
Time Frame: Day 57
Maximal post baseline LSR was defined as the highest grade of any LSR reported at any post baseline visits for a participant. The LSR assessment was an Investigator's (or sub-investigator's) assessment of the following signs on the treatment area: erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration. The LSRs were graded on a 4-point scale ranging from 0=absent, 1=mild (slightly, barely perceptible), 2=moderate (distinct presence), and 3=severe (marked, intense).
Day 57
Number of Participants With Pigmentation and Scarring in the Treatment Area
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 predose), Days 5, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Absence or presence of pigmentation (i.e., hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation) and scarring in the treatment area were assessed.
Baseline (Day 1 predose), Days 5, 8, 15, 29 and 57
Number of Participants With Adverse Event (AE), Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Events of Special Interests
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of medicinal product, whether or not considered related to medicinal product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life threatening; required persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in initial or prolonged in patient hospitalization; was congenital anomaly/birth defect or otherwise considered medically important. TEAEs (serious and non-serious) were defined as either those AEs with onset after first dose or those pre-existing AEs that worsen after first dose. Events of special interest included skin cancers (including basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma and their location and treatment area), ocular exposure, overdose, and pregnancy.
Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, Events of Special Interests Within the Treatment Area After Day 57 and up to 12 Months Post-Day 57
Time Frame: From Day 57 up to 12-months post-Day 57
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant which does not necessarily have causal relationship with treatment. An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of medicinal product, whether or not considered related to medicinal product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death; was life threatening; required persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in initial or prolonged in patient hospitalization; was congenital anomaly/birth defect or otherwise considered medically important. Events of special interest included skin cancers (including basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma and their location and treatment area), ocular exposure, overdose, and pregnancy.
From Day 57 up to 12-months post-Day 57
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Safety Observations- Hematology, Blood Chemistry, Urinalysis
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Assessed laboratory parameters included hematology, blood chemistry and urinalysis. Clinical significance and abnormal observations were determined by the investigator.
From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Safety Observations- Vital Signs
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Vital signs included measurement of pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Safety Observations- Physical Examination
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
A physical examination included weight and height measurements was performed. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Safety Observations- Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time Frame: From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57
ECG parameters included heart rhythm, heart rate, QRS intervals, QT intervals, RR intervals and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
From Baseline (Day 1 predose) up to Day 57

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jane Fang, MD, Athenex, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratosis

Clinical Trials on KX2-391 Ointment 1%

3
Subscribe