Smartphone Applications Youth With Early Psychosis in Community Outpatient Settings (BHCOEMobi)

September 13, 2017 updated by: University of California, Davis

Smartphone Applications For Use in Youth With Early Psychosis in Community Outpatient Settings

The project aims to test the utility of implementing a mobile health application ("mhealth app") in early psychosis care in the community outpatient setting and in the university medical center setting. We will enroll 60 individuals in the early stages of psychotic illness who are receiving care in two UC Davis affiliated community based early psychosis outpatient programs: the Aldea Child and Family Services SOAR Programs in Napa and Solano Counties (Napa SOAR, and Solano SOAR), as well as the UC Davis Early Psychosis Programs (EDAPT and SacEDAPT clinics). Early psychosis (EP) participants will include individuals at high risk for developing a psychotic illness (termed "clinical high risk" or CHR) and individuals within two years of their first psychotic episode (termed "first episode psychosis" or FEP). Over the course of five months, EP participants will use the app on their mobile device to complete daily surveys assessing mood, social interactions and medication adherence, and weekly surveys assessing clinical symptoms, sleep and medication adherence. EP participants will also complete clinical assessments with UC Davis research staff at the initial and final study appointments (baseline and five month timepoints). Clinicians working in the three early psychosis programs will also participate in the study. In their clinical role, they will interact with EP participants' app data via the Dashboard, a secure web-based portal, and provide feedback on the clinical utility of the data that is provided on the dashboard. EP participants and their clinicians will also provide feedback on the impact of the app on the therapeutic relationship.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Although remission of psychotic symptoms following a patient's first episode of psychosis is achievable through pharmacological and psychosocial treatment, 50% of patients relapse within two years; 80% relapse within five. Relapse, defined as a recurrence of positive psychotic symptoms, is associated with cumulative increases in levels of psychotic symptoms following recovery, decreased social and community functioning, decreased quality of life, and increased hospitalizations. Given the negative impact on patients and their families, and the increasing cost of services as a function of relapse, development of effective relapse prevention strategies is imperative. Predictors of relapse amenable to treatment include: 1) clinical factors such as an exacerbation of clinical symptoms indicative of impending relapse; 2) treatment engagement factors such as medication adherence and therapeutic alliance; and 3) functioning factors such social impairments. Using mobile health technology in a community based outpatient clinic, we propose to specifically address these three types of relapse predictor variables.

The mobile health application tested in this study provides a user interface and a provider interface. The user interface is the mobile application (i.e. the "app") that patients interact with via their smartphone. This is designed to be simple and easily accessible. The app gathers "active" data, i.e. self-report surveys, which the user is alerted to via notifications on their device. Active data are analyzed and summarized for each patient on the "Dashboard", a provider-facing web portal for accessing concise and relevant information about a patient. The Dashboard provides up-to-date information regarding a patient's survey responses. Providers then use this information to better inform treatment decisions.

Specific aims and associated hypotheses are as follows:

Aim 1: Determine the feasibility and acceptability of the mhealth app in a community based outpatient early psychosis population. Hypothesis a: EPs will show high utilization of the mhealth app and low dropout, as well as high satisfaction and endorsement of continued use of the app. Hypothesis b: Clinicians will report high satisfaction and endorsement of continued use of the app.

Aim 2: Identify mhealth data related to key patient outcomes to inform calibration of patient status alerts. Hypothesis: Reductions in phone calls/text messages and/or increases in self-reported ratings of basic symptoms will predict psychotic symptom flares, increased clinic utilization, psychiatric ER visits and hospitalizations.

Aim 3: Evaluate the effect of the mhealth app on medication adherence, therapeutic alliance, and insight. Hypothesis a: After five months of app use, patients will report improved medication adherence, therapeutic alliance with their clinicians, and insight into their illness. Hypothesis b: After five months of use, clinicians will report improved therapeutic alliance with their patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Imaging Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 30 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria for EP and CHR participants are: age 13-30 years, English fluency, and receiving clinical care at one of three UC Davis affiliated early psychosis clinics in the Northern California region: 1) UC Davis Early Psychosis Program (SacEDAPT & EDAPT clinics); 2) Aldea Solano SOAR Program; 3) Aldea Napa SOAR program.
  • CHR participants will have no history of psychosis and will demonstrate attenuated psychotic symptoms consistent with the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), or genetic risk (first-degree relative with psychosis) in conjunction with a substantial drop in functioning over the past year.
  • FEP participants will be ascertained within three years or less from illness onset and have diagnoses of affective (i.e. bipolar) and non-affective psychosis (i.e. schizophrenia) according to DSM-IV criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • IQ below 70
  • history neurological disorders
  • current substance abuse/dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Psychosis (EP)
EP participants will be individuals who are either a) at clinical high risk (CHR) for developing psychosis and/or bipolar disorder, or b) First Episode Psychosis (FEP) participants meeting criteria for schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or another psychotic, non-schizophrenia diagnosis including those with bipolar disorder.
Mobile application (i.e. the "app") that patients interact with via their smartphone to collect daily and weekly survey information. Data is visualized on a clinician-facing Dashboard, which can be used to inform treatment.
Experimental: Clinicians
Clinicians/treatment team members who are providing treatment services to the EP participants at one of the three early psychosis clinics.
Mobile application (i.e. the "app") that patients interact with via their smartphone to collect daily and weekly survey information. Data is visualized on a clinician-facing Dashboard, which can be used to inform treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: 18 months
Feasibility will be measured by utilization of the application (i.e. number of enrolled and active participants versus total patient population invited).
18 months
Acceptability/Satisfaction
Time Frame: 18 months
Acceptability will be measured with satisfaction survey ratings of mhealth app by patients and clinicians.
18 months
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Time Frame: 18 months
a 24-item semi-structured clinical interview rating symptom severity at ascertainment across four domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, agitation/mania, and depression/anxiety.
18 months
Critical incidents
Time Frame: 18 months
Includes information from patient chart: increased clinic contact, psychiatric ER visits or hospitalizations, and progression from a high risk state to first episode psychosis.
18 months
The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale (Haro et al., 2003)
Time Frame: 18 months
is a brief 12-item scale assessing illness severity and degree of improvement over follow-up that is appropriate for use in clinical or research settings.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication adherence
Time Frame: 18 months
The MARS (Thompson et al., 2000) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire assessing medication taking behavior, attitudes to medication, and side effects.
18 months
Therapeutic Alliance
Time Frame: 18 months
Therapeutic alliance will be assessed with the STAR (Mcguire-Snieckus et al., 2007), a 12-item questionnaire with patient and clinician versions assessing positive collaboration and positive clinician input (both versions), non-supportive input (patient version), and emotional difficulties (clinician version).
18 months
Insight
Time Frame: 18 months
Patient's insight into their illness will be assessed using the IS (Birchwood et al., 1994), an 8-item self-report questionnaire assessing awareness of illness, need for treatment, and attribution of symptoms.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychosis

Clinical Trials on Mobi mHealth app

Subscribe