Genomic Testing and Resulting Medical Decisions

The Use of Genomic Testing and the Resulting Medical Decisions According to Target Identification

There is no evidence available about which molecular profiling methods are currently used for cancer patients in Austrian clinical practice. The construction of the registry proposed as a completely independent research endeavor, will be helpful for scientific evaluation and the establishment of highly credible data.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the situation of enormous possible beneficial options for patients, health care systems, researchers and companies and the simultaneously present high number of uncertainties, the establishment of an independent registry for patients undergoing any type of comprehensive genomic profiling offers many advantages.

In particular, an overview of the speed of development, the "market penetration", the use of the technology in specific indications (tumor types, stages and in specific situations of unresponsiveness to certain drugs), the frequency by which treatment decisions will definitely follow the result of comprehensive genomic profiling and the reasons for this, the treatment outcome of such patients, the platform technologies applied (in-house (which types), vs. commercial) and the development of these parameters over time and in relation to the development of novel drugs will be analyzed.

The registry proposes to cover the time period from the years 2016 to 2019, which will allow for assessment of both the current and emerging landscape of genomic/molecular testing practice in Austria and effect of molecular profiling on patient care and outcome.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Richard Greil, MD
  • Phone Number: 25801 +43577255
  • Email: r.greil@salk.at

Study Locations

      • Feldkirch, Austria, 6807
        • Recruiting
        • Innere Medizin II, LKH Feldkirch
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Winder, MD
      • Graz, Austria, A-8036
        • Recruiting
        • Medizinische Universitaet Graz, Univ.-Klinik f. Innere Medizin, Onkologie
        • Contact:
          • Armin Gerger, MD
      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
        • Recruiting
        • Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Seeber, MD
      • Krems an der Donau, Austria, 6500
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Krems
        • Contact:
          • Martin Pecherstorfer, MD
      • Linz, Austria, A-4020
        • Recruiting
        • BHS Linz: Interne I: Internistische Onkologie, Hämatologie und Gastroenterologie
        • Contact:
          • Andreas Petzer, MD
      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Recruiting
        • IIIrd Medical Department, Private Medical University Hospital Salzburg
        • Contact:
          • Richard Greil, MD
      • St. Pölten, Austria, 3100
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten
        • Contact:
          • Petra Pichler, MD
      • Vöcklabruck, Austria, 4840
        • Recruiting
        • Salzkammergut-Klinikum Vöcklabruck
        • Contact:
          • Klaus Wilthoner, MD
      • Wels, Austria, 4600
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH
        • Contact:
          • Sonja Heibl, MD
      • Wien, Austria, 1090
        • Recruiting
        • Medizinische Universität Wien
        • Contact:
          • Christian Singer, MD
      • Zams, Austria, 6511
        • Recruiting
        • St. Vinzenz Krankenhaus Betriebs GmbH
        • Contact:
          • Edward Wöll, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

A cohort of oncology patients who received or plan to receive comprehensive genomic testing anytime on or after January 1, 2016. Patient medical, testing and treatment information will be obtained through extraction of data from existing patient medical charts. Longitudinal follow-up data, including survival and tumor progression, will also be extracted from patient medical charts. This patient follow-up data will be obtained until patient death or loss to follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

This registry will include cancer patients for which broad genomic profiling is indicated as assessed by the medical need and as deemed appropriate by the physician, for example

  • cancer with high mutational load and suspicion of regular or frequent formation of neoantigens

    • skin, lung, stomach, esophagus, colorectum, bladder, uterus, cervix, liver, head and neck, kidney, breast
    • lymphoma B-cell
  • any other neoplastic disease where molecular targeting is performed but treatment fails
  • cancer of unknown primary origin (CUP)
  • planned or already carried out comprehensive genomic testing as of Jan 1, 2016 note: this registry will not initially register patients who are tested for only 1-5 mutations by conventional means, but patients undergoing genomic profiling based on NGS)
  • a patient´s signed informed consent
  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Due to the non-interventional design of the registry there are no specific exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Types of:molecular profiling methods
Time Frame: 3 years
To describe types of:molecular profiling methods used in the Austrian registry centres
3 years
Types of cancer, for which comprehensive molecular profiling is used
Time Frame: 3 years
To describe types of cancer, for which comprehensive molecular profiling is used
3 years
Timing of molecular profiling
Time Frame: 3 years
To describe the timing of molecular profiling in relation to stage of the disease (e.g. at diagnosis, after surgery, radiation therapy, after first/second/third/late line)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with mutations identified
Time Frame: 3 years

To describe targets identified:

  • number of patients with at least one mutation identified
  • number of patients with at least one druggable target identified
  • number of patients with more than one druggable targets identified
  • number of druggable targets per cancer type
3 years
Quality standards
Time Frame: 3 years

To describe tests used and quality standards:

  • to compare results of NGS based molecular test systems with single marker tests or small gene panel tests
  • quality standards of the test methods used (TAT, certification status)
  • to evaluate development of methods used over time
  • usage of commercial testing vs. in-house testing, platforms used, and number of genes as well as gene size analyzed (eg whole exome with or without selected intron sequencing vs. hot spot exome sequencing)
3 years
Treatment decisions
Time Frame: 3 years

To describe treatment decisions:

  • frequency by which treatment decision follows the result of NGS testing
  • frequency with druggable targets with available on-label therapy option
  • treatment decisions in the presence of more than one druggable target
3 years
Outcome of treatment
Time Frame: 3 years
To describe outcome of treatment in patients receiving therapy in concordance with the test result
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Greil, MD, IIIrd Medical Department, Private Medical University Hospital Salzburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Genomic testing

3
Subscribe