- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03303612
Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI)
Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) a Bayesian Randomized Trial (COME-TAVI)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study population consists of pacemaker-free patients that are 18 years or older undergoing a TAVI with new onset left bundle branch block. Patient consent is required.
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following two groups:
Group 1: electrophysiology-based algorithmic approach
Group 2: standard clinical follow-up with transcutaneous cardiac monitoring.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: lena Rivard, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 2120 514-376-3330
- Email: lena.rivard@umontreal.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Caroline Girard, EP Prof.
- Phone Number: 2905 514-376-3330
- Email: caroline.girard@icm-mhi.org
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T1C8
- Recruiting
- Faculty of medicine
-
Contact:
- lena Rivard, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 2120 514-376-3330
- Email: lena.rivard@umontreal.ca
-
Contact:
- Caroline Girard
- Phone Number: 4058 514-376-3330
- Email: caroline.girard@icm-mhi.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Informed consent to participate
- Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI implantation (i.e. present at day 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) or LBBB (i.e., prior to TAVI)
- Class I or IIA indication for PPM implantation according to management guidelines
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: EP-based approach/pacemaker implant
Subjects will undergo an EP study prior to hospital discharge and will receive a pacemaker implantation if the HV interval is ≥65 msec. In the case where the electrical slowdown is not confirmed by the electrophysiological study, the participant will not have a pacemaker implantation. |
Patient will be in the electrophysiology laboratory.
The doctor will freeze the groin area and a medication may be given to help the patient relax.
A catheter will be inserted into the groin up to the heart and the heart's electrical system will be recorded.
|
Other: Compared transcutaneous cardiac monitor
Subjects will undergo a minimum of 72 hour ECG monitoring in hospital and receive transcutaneous monitoring prior to hospital discharge for a duration of 30 days.
|
Transcutaneous cardiac patches will allow continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for a 30-day period. For the first randomized patients at the Montreal Heart Institute, Icentia was used and then was changed to a m-Health® device which allows continuous cardiac monitoring. The PocketECG from m-Health® is attached to 3 electrodes on the chest and contains a SIM card that transmits to a server located in Burlington, Ontario .The COME-TAVI coordinating center and the associated site will be informed rapidly of any events that occur . These events include: Ventricular fibrillation; Sustained ventricular tachycardia Any RR interval >5 sec; Third-degree AV block or Mobitz 2 AV block; |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of patients with cardiovascular hospitalization, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of participants who experienced cardiovascular hospitalizations, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of participants with cardiovascular hospitalizations.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of participants who were hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons within one-year post-TAVI.
|
12 months
|
Number of participants with hospitalisations (Total)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of participants who were hospitalized one-year post-TAVI.
|
12 months
|
Number of participants with emergency visits.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of participants who had emergency visits after TAVI.
|
12 months
|
Number of participants experiencing syncope
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of participants who experienced syncope after TAVI.
|
12 months
|
Cost-effectiveness of EP-guided procedure compared to cardiac monitoring [incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)].
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for one strategy compared to the other.
|
12 months
|
Number of procedural complications in the group of EP-guided procedure compared to the group of cardiac monitoring.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
This is the number of procedural complications in the group of EP-guided approach compared to cardiac monitoring within 30 days.
|
30 days
|
Number of atrio-ventricular blocks in the group of EP-guided procedure compared to the group of transcutaneous cardiac monitoring.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This is the number of atrio-ventricular blocks in the EP-guided procedure group compared to the transcutaneous cardiac monitoring group within 12 months of TAVI
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Léna Rivard, MD, MSC, Montreal Heart Institute
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ICM#2015-1949
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisGeorgia
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
The Medicines CompanyCompletedTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement | Aortic Valve Replacement | Severe Aortic StenosisNetherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, France, Italy, Switzerland
-
Ningbo Jenscare Biotechnology Co., Ltd.UnknownAortic Regurgitation | Severe Aortic Stenosis
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency | Regurgitation, Aortic Valve | Aortic Valve IncompetenceUnited States
-
Sorin Group USA, Inc.TerminatedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency | Regurgitation, Aortic Valve | Aortic Valve IncompetenceUnited States
-
Edwards LifesciencesActive, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Regurgitation | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisChina
-
Edwards LifesciencesActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Aortic Stenosis | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Aortic Valve Insufficiency | Mitral StenosisUnited States, Canada, Poland
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting
-
BC Centre for Improved Cardiovascular HealthEdwards LifesciencesUnknownTranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Severe Aortic StenosisCanada
Clinical Trials on Pacemaker implant
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBradycardia | Sinus Node DysfunctionUnited States, Israel, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Canada, China
-
Parc de Salut MarCompletedHeart Failure | Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy | Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third DegreeSpain
-
Nanostim, Inc.UnknownAtrial Fibrillation With 2 or 3° AV or Bifascicular Bundle Branch (BBB) Block | Normal Sinus Rhythm With 2 or 3° AV or BBB Block | Sinus Bradycardia With Infrequent Pauses or Unexplained Syncope With EP FindingsGermany, Netherlands, Czech Republic
-
MedtronicCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompletedClass I or II Indication for Implantation of a Single Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker According to ACC/AHA/HRS 2001 Guidelines and Any National GuidelinesUnited States, Netherlands, Japan, Serbia, Spain, Greece, Canada, India, Denmark, Czechia, South Africa, Malaysia, Austria, United Kingdom, Hungary, China, Australia, France, Italy
-
Boston Scientific CorporationICON plcCompletedPost Market Surveillance Study Following Clinical RoutineGermany, Finland
-
Castilla-La Mancha Health ServiceUnknownComplication | Defibrillators | Pacemakers | Pacemaker Electrode Lead FractureSpain
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartFondazione TelethonUnknownMyotonic Dystrophy | Sudden Cardiac DeathItaly
-
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation...EBR Systems, Inc.Not yet recruiting
-
Medtronic Bakken Research CenterCompletedCardiac Pacing Indication classI/IIa According AHA/ACCSpain