- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06026683
Conduction System Stimulation to Avoid Left Ventricle Dysfunction (STAY)
The aim of the study is to demonstrate that conduction system pacing (CSP) can preserve a normal ventricular function compared to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) in patients with pre-implant preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a high burden of expected ventricular pacing due to atrioventricular conduction block (AV block).
After informed consent signature, patients with high degree AV block and normal LVEF will be randomized to permanent pacemaker stimulation with CSP vs RVAP.
All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The STAY trial (Conduction System sTimulation to Avoid left ventricle dYsfunction) is a single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel, controlled study, comparing mid-term outcomes in a population undergoing pacemaker implantation due to a high degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB). The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients signed informed consent and were implanted between September 2019 until December 2022 in a 1:1 randomized fashion to conventional RVAP vs CSP (HBS or LBBS). Randomization was performed during the pre-procedural antibiotic infusion.
All the patients have a complete evaluation before the procedure and at 3 and 6 months follow-up, including demographic and clinical characteristics, physical examination, twelve-lead ECG, Minnesota score (MLWHFQ), and blood test with NT-ProBNP determination. Patients also have a transthoracic echography before the procedure and at 6 months follow-up.
At 6 months echocardiographic and clinical data will be compared.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08003
- Hospital del Mar
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Age of 18 years or more
- Preserved or mild deteriorated LVEF (Simpson >40%) assessed by a recent (<1 month before implantation) transthoracic echocardiography.
- Indication for pacing based on the presence of a high degree AVB, and consequently with an anticipated high burden of ventricular pacing (>50%).
- Live expectancy of more than 6 months and capability to understand the protocol, signing the informed consent form and accomplish the follow-up.
Exclusion criteria:
- Indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator device.
- Patients with previous LVD and a recovered LVEF
- History of myocardial infarction/revascularization or cardiac surgery within 6 months before randomization
- Pregnancy, active cancer treatment, or participation in another clinical trial with active treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CSP (Conduction system pacing)
Patients with pacemaker implanted with conduction system pacing.
|
Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing
|
|
Active Comparator: RVAP (Right ventricular apical pacing)
Patients with pacemaker implanted with right ventricular apical pacing.
|
Implantation of pacemaker with conduction system pacing or right ventricular apical pacing
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delta-LVEF at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in LVEF in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEF
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delta-LVEDD at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in each group at 6 months vs baseline LVEDD
|
6 months
|
|
Delta-NTProBNP at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in NTProBNP levels in each group at 6 months vs baseline NTProBNP levels
|
6 months
|
|
Readmissions due to heart failure
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of readmissions due to heart failure in each group during follow-up
|
6 months
|
|
New onset Atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Number of new-onset atrial fibrillation episodes in each group during follow-up
|
6 months
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 6 months
|
All-cause Mortality in each group during follow-up
|
6 months
|
|
Delta-MLWHFQ (Minnesota score) at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in MLWHFQ score in each group at 6 months vs baseline MLWHFQ score.
The MLWHFQ score is obtained by using a questionnaire of 21 aspects.
It depicts how heart failure affected the daily life of the patients during the last month previous to the questionnaire.
Each question can be scored from 0 ("No" effect) to 5 ("Very much" effect)
|
6 months
|
|
Delta-New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in NYHA class in each group at 6 months vs baseline NYHA class. NYHA class places patients in one of four categories based on limitations of physical activity:
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Ermengol Vallès, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar
- Principal Investigator: Carlos González, M.D., Parc de Salut Mar. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STAY trial
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Umeå UniversityRegion NorrbottenNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureSweden
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Pacemaker implant
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedBradycardia | Sinus Node DysfunctionUnited States, Israel, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Canada, China
-
Óscar Cano PérezRecruiting
-
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de BellvitgeHospital Universitari de Bellvitge; Fundació La Marató de TV3RecruitingComplete Heart Block | Second Degree Atrioventricular Block Möbitz Type IISpain
-
Nanostim, Inc.UnknownAtrial Fibrillation With 2 or 3° AV or Bifascicular Bundle Branch (BBB) Block | Normal Sinus Rhythm With 2 or 3° AV or BBB Block | Sinus Bradycardia With Infrequent Pauses or Unexplained Syncope With EP FindingsGermany, Netherlands, Czech Republic
-
MedtronicCompleted
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompletedClass I or II Indication for Implantation of a Single Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker According to ACC/AHA/HRS 2001 Guidelines and Any National GuidelinesUnited States, Netherlands, Japan, Serbia, Spain, Greece, Canada, India, Denmark, Czechia, South Africa, Malaysia, Austria, United Kingdom, Hungary, China, Australia, France, Italy
-
Montreal Heart InstituteRecruitingAortic Valve Stenosis | Left Bundle-Branch BlockCanada, France
-
Boston Scientific CorporationICON plcCompletedPost Market Surveillance Study Following Clinical RoutineGermany, Finland
-
Castilla-La Mancha Health ServiceUnknownComplication | Defibrillators | Pacemakers | Pacemaker Electrode Lead FractureSpain
-
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation...EBR Systems, Inc.Not yet recruiting