Heavy Bupivacaine in Peribulbar Block

October 13, 2017 updated by: Hassan Mohamed Ali, Cairo University

Heavy Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine in Peribulbar Block

Most of the ophthalmic procedures are performed under local anesthesia as the patient is often elderly and with diseases. This may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality under general anesthesia. Different eye blocks have been practiced with great success. Moreover, it is associated with less hemodynamic instability, less respiratory depression, better postoperative pain relief, and less nausea and vomiting than general anesthesia. It is also associated with a reduction in stress response, maintained oxygen saturation and cardiovascular stability, in addition to the production of good akinesia and anesthesia alleviating occulo-medullary reflexes, all make local anesthesia more superior and safe technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peribulbar anesthesia is widely practiced now as a safe local block for cataract eye surgeries. However, the limited duration of these blocks was shown to be the main problem encountered intra-operatively. Therefore, additional top-up doses are usually needed to continue the operation. Many kinds of research tried to introduce solutions in order to prolong the duration of the local anesthetics used. Many researchers tried different volumes, doses and adjuvant to local anesthetics, and studied their effects There are many studies that evaluated the effect of baricity of local anesthetic on the potency of motor block and the duration of motor and sensory blockade.

However, no properly designed randomized, controlled studies have evaluated the feasibility and reliability of baricity local anesthetic agents used for the peribulbar block.

Aim of the work prospective, randomized study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the baricitized bupivacaine used for the peribulbar block in patients undergoing posterior segment surgeries.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Cairo, Giza, Egypt, 1234
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I or II.
  • 30-80 years old
  • Patients scheduled for elective unilateral posterior segment surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal.
  • orbital deformity
  • axial length( >28 mm )
  • increased intraocular pressure, or if they were blind in the contralateral eye, international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5
  • allergy to local anesthetics, mentally retarded patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: hyperbaric bupvacaine group
Peribulbar block will be performed using a total volume of 7 ml 6ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% + hyaluronidase (50 IU) in 1ml saline
hyperbaric bupivacaine in Peribulbar block will be injected in the posterior segment surgery
Other Names:
  • trial group
Active Comparator: isobaric bupvacaine group
Peribulbar block will be performed using a total volume of 7 ml 6ml isorbaric bupivacaine 0.5% + hyaluronidase (50 IU) in 1ml saline
isobaric bupivacaine in Peribulbar block will be injected in the posterior segment surgery
Other Names:
  • control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The onset and duration of lid and globe akinesia
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperative
scoring the ocular movements in each direction of gaze
12 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 20, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • badway 2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthetics, Local

Clinical Trials on hyperbaric bupvacaine in Peribulbar block

Subscribe