Midazolam Additive to Local Anesthetic in Peribulbar Block

August 10, 2018 updated by: Al Jedaani Hospital

Efficacy of Midazolam Addition to Local Anesthetic in Peribulbar Block. Randomized, Controlled Trial

Regional eye blocks are usually preferred for ophthalmic procedures. Peribulbar block (PBB) is a safe alternative for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Many studies tried to solve this issue by means of prolonging the duration of action of the local anesthetics used. Several drugs were tried as adjuncts to local anesthetics, and their effects have been studied. Midazolam added to the list of adjuvant used in the subarachnoid or epidural block can produce analgesia, probably mediated by the benzodiazepine-Gamma Amino-Butyric Acid(GABA) receptor complex.

The investigators hypothesized that the addition of midazolam to lidocaine will improve the quality of the peribulbar block; fasten the onset and prolonging its anesthetic and analgesic duration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Meccah
      • Jeddah, Meccah, Saudi Arabia, 21462/7500
        • Al Jedaani group of hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 90 adult patients with ASA physical status I to III
  • Aged 40-70 years
  • Scheduled for elective extracapsular or phacoemulsification cataract surgery with peribulbar block
  • No history of allergy to local anesthetics
  • Axial length less than 28 mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal to share in the study
  • communication barrier (e.g. impaired hearing, disturbed conscious level, impaired mental status)
  • uncontrolled tremors
  • morbidly obese patients
  • allergy to lidocaine
  • coagulation abnormalities
  • glaucoma
  • recent surgical procedure on the same eye.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group C(control)
Peribulbar block without midazolam (peribulbar block using a mixture of lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml)

The Peribulbar block was performed by inserting the needle percutaneously at the area bounded by 1- The imaginary perpendicular line joining inferior lacrimal papilla to the inferior margin of the orbit, laterally 2- Lateral border of the nose, medially 3- Inferior lacrimal canaliculus, superiorly and 4- Inferior orbital margin, inferiorly. The needle was introduced in an anteroposterior direction to its half-length and then in an oblique direction to the optical foramen.

After negative aspiration, 6-8 ml of local anesthetic solution (lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml ) was injected slowly over about 40 seconds or until the appearance of lid fullness. This was followed by a gentle digital massage to the eyeball to facilitate diffusion of the local anesthetic mixture.

Other Names:
  • Peribulbar block without midazolam
EXPERIMENTAL: Group M1
Peribulbar block with midazolam 50 µg (peribulbar block using a mixture of lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml. plus midazolam 50 µg/ml)

The Peribulbar block was performed by inserting the needle percutaneously at the area bounded by 1- The imaginary perpendicular line joining inferior lacrimal papilla to the inferior margin of the orbit, laterally 2- Lateral border of the nose, medially 3- Inferior lacrimal canaliculus, superiorly and 4- Inferior orbital margin, inferiorly. The needle was introduced in an anteroposterior direction to its half-length and then in an oblique direction to the optical foramen.

After negative aspiration, 6-8 ml of local anesthetic solution (lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml. plus midazolam 50 µg/ml ) was injected slowly over about 40 seconds or until the appearance of lid fullness. This was followed by a gentle digital massage to the eyeball to facilitate diffusion of the local anesthetic mixture.

Other Names:
  • Peribulbar block with midazolam 50ug
EXPERIMENTAL: Group M2
Peribulbar block with midazolam 100 µg(peribulbar block using a mixture of lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml. plus midazolam 100 µg/ml

The Peribulbar block was performed by inserting the needle percutaneously at the area bounded by 1- The imaginary perpendicular line joining inferior lacrimal papilla to the inferior margin of the orbit, laterally 2- Lateral border of the nose, medially 3- Inferior lacrimal canaliculus, superiorly and 4- Inferior orbital margin, inferiorly. The needle was introduced in an anteroposterior direction to its half-length and then in an oblique direction to the optical foramen.

After negative aspiration, 6-8 ml of local anesthetic solution (lidocaine 2%, hyaluronidase 15 IU / ml. plus midazolam 100 µg/ml ) was injected slowly over about 40 seconds or until the appearance of lid fullness. This was followed by a gentle digital massage to the eyeball to facilitate diffusion of the local anesthetic mixture.

Other Names:
  • Peribulbar block with midazolam 100ug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of the sensory and motor block
Time Frame: 6 hours
The quality of the sensory and motor block was assessed using the Ocular Anesthesia Scoring System (OASS). Patients were categorized into three groups according to the quality of the block and level of anesthesia achieved: poor (0-3), average (4-9) and good block (10-14)
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset and duration of block
Time Frame: 6 hours
The onset of motor block (globe akinesia), sensory block, and lid akinesia (ptosis). Were recorded from the time of injection of (LAS) until complete globe akinesia, a disappearance of sensation, and complete lid akinesia (ptosis). Duration of globe akinesia was recorded till recurrence of muscle movements (score 8). Similarly, the return of sensation to the globe was assessed by digital spear pressure at the limbus.
6 hours
Analgesia
Time Frame: 4 hours postoperative
Postoperative pain was assessed at 30 minutes' intervals utilizing verbal rating scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 to 10 (where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst imaginable pain) for a period of 4 hours postoperative or until first analgesic request
4 hours postoperative
local or systemic complications
Time Frame: 6 hours
sub-conjunctival hematoma, itching, ecchymosis, diplopia, blindness, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, and hypotension, were recorded.
6 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Peribulbar block (control)

3
Subscribe