A Study to Assess Therapeutic Equivalence Between Test EMLA Patch With Marketed EMLA Patch in Healthy Subjects. (EMLA)

November 13, 2017 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Double-blind, Randomized, 2-period, Placebo-controlled, Single-center, Crossover Study to Assess the Therapeutic Equivalence of the EMLA Current Reference Patch and the EMLA Test Patch in Healthy Subjects.

A double-blind, randomized, 2-period, placebo-controlled, single-center, crossover study, efficacy study demonstrating the therapeutic equivalence of the test cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch and the current commercial cellulose disc (matrix) in EMLA patch in healthy subjects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be a double-blind, randomized, 2-period, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy male and female subjects, performed at a single study center. Prior to inclusion, informed consent will be obtained. A brief medical history, including limited demographic data (gender, age and ethnicity) will be recorded, and eligibility for inclusion to the study will be established through a physical inspection of hands. Subjects will be shown how to complete the VAS. Visual analogue scale (VAS) as a research tool is frequently used for the assessment of pain severity and relief. VAS is easy to use and can be applied in a variety of settings; results are reproducible. VAS data are sensitive to treatment effects and can be analyzed using parametric statistical techniques. At each specific study visit, each subject will undergo a left-right comparison of two patch preparations, followed by a repeated test with an alternate combination of preparations. Thus, the study will comprise: Visit 1: EMLA Test Patch plus Placebo Patch OR EMLA Test Patch plus EMLA current Reference Patch. Visit 2: EMLA Test Patch plus EMLA current Reference Patch OR EMLA Test Patch plus Placebo Patch. There will be a washout period of at minimum of 4 calendar days between treatment periods (visits). No follow-up visit is needed. Any adverse event (AE) that is ongoing at the last visit will be followed up as appropriate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 14050
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated, written informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
  2. Healthy male and female subjects aged 18 to 60 years.
  3. Have healthy skin over hands, with no inflammation or open wounds.
  4. Able to understand, read and speak the German language.
  5. Easy accessible veins on the dorsum of both hands.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current significant active skin disease such as widespread eczema or active atopic dermatitis.
  2. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI, to local anesthetics of the amide type or to any of the components of the EMLA emulsion (e.g., castor oil polyoxyl hydrogenated).
  3. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing allergy/hypersensitivity, as judged by the PI to chlorohexidine (preservative in the placebo patch emulsion).
  4. Subjects who previously entered this study.
  5. Involvement of any AstraZeneca, PAREXEL or study site employee or their close relatives.
  6. Judgement by the PI that the subject should not participate in the study if they have any ongoing or recent (i.e., during the screening period) minor medical complaints that may interfere with the interpretation of study data or are considered unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements.
  7. Vulnerable subjects, e.g., kept in detention, protected adults under guardianship, trusteeship, or committed to an institution by governmental or juridical order.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cohort 1
EMLA Test Patch.
EMLA® Test Patch containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc. The source of cellulose for the cellulose disc will be provided from a new supplier in this test patch.
Active Comparator: Cohort 2
EMLA Reference Patch.
EMLA current Reference Patch, containing the active ingredients lidocaine base 25 mg/g and prilocaine base 25 mg/g in an oil-in-water emulsion saturating the absorbent cellulose disc.
Placebo Comparator: Cohort 3
Placebo patch.
Placebo Patch, based on the EMLA Test Patch (incorporating the absorbent cellulose disc with cellulose from the current supplier), where the absorbent disc will be saturated with a placebo oil-in-water emulsion, where the eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine is replaced with fractionated coconut oil and chlorhexidine digluconate 20%, with identical appearance to the active EMLA patches.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of EMLA Test Patch with the marketed EMLA patch (EMLA current Reference Patch) by pain reduction assessment.
Time Frame: At test procedure 1 and at test procedure 2 (which is after 4 days of washout period following test procedure 1).
To compare the anesthetic efficacy in pain reduction after an intravenous needle insertion whether or not actual IV insertion was achieved will be evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS). The degree of pain experienced will be assessed on a 100 mm horizontal, non-graded paper-based VAS, with the endpoints representing "no pain" (0 mm), to "the worst possible pain" (100 mm). The VAS scores will be listed by subject, treatment sequence (TP/TR and TR/TP, where T=test, R=reference and P=Placebo), treatment (T, R and P) and hand (left, right).
At test procedure 1 and at test procedure 2 (which is after 4 days of washout period following test procedure 1).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with Adverse events (AEs), skin sensation and reactions as variables of safety and tolerability.
Time Frame: From randomization until test procedure 2 or last study visit, whichever is later.
AEs will be collected from the start of randomization throughout the treatment period up to and including the Follow-up Visit. Any AE that is ongoing at the last visit will be followed up as appropriate. Serious AEs will be recorded from the time of informed consent. Local skin sensations will be assessed by asking about injection site sensations (sensation experienced before removal of the patch), this will be rated on a four-point scale: none, mild, moderate or severe. Skin reactions will be performed after removal of the patch to inspect the area which has been in contact with the cream and the patch. Two separate assessments will be made - one for the skin in contact with the cream and one for the skin which had been in contact with the adhesive border.
From randomization until test procedure 2 or last study visit, whichever is later.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr. med.Rainard Fuhr, Parexel Early Phase Clinical Unit Berlin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on EMLA test patch

3
Subscribe