Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis

Tolerability and Efficacy of Daylight Aminolevulinic-acid-photodynamic Therapy (ALA-PDT) Compared With Conventional ALA-PDT for Treatment of Actinic Keratosis on the Face or Scalp

This is a randomized, single-blind controlled trial with parallel group design to determine whether daylight photodynamic therapy (PDT) affords a reduction in treatment symptoms of pain, burning, and pruritus as measured by 1) symptom level during the treatment period and 2) pain at the end of treatment exposure.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Actinic Keratoses
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid Topical 20% Topical Solution; Device: BLU-U blue light phototherapy illuminator

Detailed Description

Actinic keratoses (AK) are common precancerous skin lesions that arise on sun-damaged skin. Treatment is aimed at preventing progression to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). First-line therapy for clinically apparent lesions includes cryotherapy and curettage; and field therapy options are topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT involves the topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or one of its derivatives, as a photosensitizing agent. In response, rapidly proliferating, dysplastic cells preferentially accumulate protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). When PpIX is activated by blue or red light, singlet oxygen species are produced, resulting in cell death. PDT is beneficial due to its brief treatment course and efficacy in clearing AK. However, its main drawbacks are the adverse effects of pain, burning, pruritus, erythema, crusting, and inflammation associated with treatment. While conventional PDT uses red or blue artificial light to activate a high concentration of accumulated protoporphyrins, daylight PDT uses natural daylight to activate lower levels of protoporphyrins in a continuous manner. Daylight PDT, when compared with conventional PDT, has been associated with significantly less pain while achieving comparable efficacy for the treatment of AK. Daylight PDT is also more cost-effective and reduces the amount of time spent in clinic. Previous randomized studies comparing daylight PDT with conventional PDT have largely used methyl-aminolevulinate as the photosensitizer, have been intra-individual comparative studies, and have been performed in Nordic countries. Because the effective light dose from natural daylight depends on geographic location and seasonal and weather changes, randomized trials in different geographic and environmental conditions are of interest. The proposed randomized clinical trial investigates the tolerability and efficacy of daylight ALA-PDT for the treatment of AK in San Francisco for the first time; subjects will be randomized to various treatment arms, as opposed to previous split-face and intra-individual studies.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 24
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
      • UCSF Dermatology

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adults at least 18 years old.
• Subjects must be able to read, sign, and understand the informed consent
• Subjects have at least 4 and no more than 20 clinically typical, visible actinic keratoses in the target treatment area on the face or scalp.
• Subject must be willing to forego any other treatments for AK in the treatment area on the face or scalp, during the study period, and for 14 days prior to screening; including cryotherapy, topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate.
• Subjects who have previously received PDT must undergo at least an 8-week washout period prior to enrollment in study.
• Subject must be willing and able to participate in the study and to comply with all study requirements including concomitant medication and other treatment restrictions, and telephone interview.
• If subject is a female of childbearing potential she must have a negative urine pregnancy test result prior to study treatment initiation and must agree to use an approved method of birth control while enrolled in the study. Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study period are excluded from the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Subjects with any dermatologic disease in the treatment area that may be exacerbated by the treatment proposed or that might impair the evaluation of AKs.
• Subjects who are currently participating in another clinical study or have completed another clinical study with an investigational drug or device on the study area within 30 days prior to study treatment initiation.
• Subjects with any medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for the trial.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A. Conventional arm; This is considered the standard of care arm for photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic keratosis. This treatment arm includes: Acetone preparation, ALA topical application, 1 hour incubation, 16 minutes 40 seconds (16:40) BLU-U exposure, application of sunscreen. Drug intervention: Aminolevulinic acid HCl (ALA) topical solution 20% Device: BLU-U blue light phototherapy illuminator	Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid Topical 20% Topical Solution; PDT involves the topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or one of its derivatives, as a photosensitizing agent. Subjects will receive ALA in all treatment arms (A, B, and C).; Device: BLU-U blue light phototherapy illuminator; Depending on the treatment arm, subjects will either receive BLU-U exposure or not. Treatment arms A and B have BLU-U exposure and treatment arm C does not.
Experimental: B. Combination arm; This treatment arm combines standard of care BLU-U exposure and daylight exposure. This treatment arm includes: Acetone preparation, ALA topical application, 15 minute incubation, 16:40 BLU-U exposure, application of sunscreen, 45 minute daylight exposure. Drug intervention: Aminolevulinic acid HCl (ALA) topical solution 20% Device: BLU-U blue light phototherapy illuminator	Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid Topical 20% Topical Solution; PDT involves the topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or one of its derivatives, as a photosensitizing agent. Subjects will receive ALA in all treatment arms (A, B, and C).; Device: BLU-U blue light phototherapy illuminator; Depending on the treatment arm, subjects will either receive BLU-U exposure or not. Treatment arms A and B have BLU-U exposure and treatment arm C does not.
Experimental: C. Daylight arm; This is the experimental arm. This treatment arm includes: Acetone preparation, ALA topical application, 15 minute incubation, application of sunscreen, 1 hour daylight exposure. Drug intervention: Aminolevulinic acid HCl (ALA) topical solution 20% Device: none	Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid Topical 20% Topical Solution; PDT involves the topical application of aminolevulinic acid (ALA), or one of its derivatives, as a photosensitizing agent. Subjects will receive ALA in all treatment arms (A, B, and C).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Treatment Symptoms	Primary objective is to determine whether daylight PDT changes treatment symptoms of pain, stinging/burning, and itching/pruritus. This was measured using a visual analog scale from 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse treatment symptoms, or more pain/burning/itching. Lower scores indicate less pain, burning/stinging, and itching/pruritus. Positive numbers represent increases in symptoms and negative numbers represent decreases.	12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percent Change in AK Lesion Count	The number of actinic keratoses within the treatment area was counted both pre and post-treatment. Then, the mean percent change from baseline actinic keratosis lesion count was calculated for each treatment group.	12 weeks
Reduction of AK Counts	The number of AK lesions within the treatment area was assessed both pre and post-treatment. Then, the number of participants with various levels of AK lesion reduction (100% reduction or greater than 75% reduction) was calculated for each treatment group. This outcome measures the proportion of subjects with complete (100%) and partial (greater than or equal to 75%) reduction of baseline actinic keratosis lesion counts at 12 weeks (study end).	12 weeks
Change in Local Skin Reaction From Pre-treatment to 12 Weeks Post-treatment	To determine whether daylight PDT affords a reduction in local skin reaction to treatment. A Local Skin Response Assessment scale will be used to measure this outcome. The investigators will grade categories including Erythema, Flaking/Scaling, crusting, swelling, Pustulation (pustules), and Erosion, on a 0-4 scale (total maximum score of 24). A higher score indicates more erythema, flaking, crusting, etc. and therefore a more robust skin reaction. A score of 0 represents no erythema, flaking, crusting, etc.	12 weeks
Peak Pain Score at Day 8 Post-treatment	Pain was measured by patient report with a visual analog scale from 0-10. 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the maximum pain score.	8 days post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Sarah Arron, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 1, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 9, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 24, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): October 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 9, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 7, 2022
• Last Verified: March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Actinic Keratoses; photodynamic therapy; aminolevulinic acid; precancerous skin lesion
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases; Neoplasms; Precancerous Conditions; Keratosis, Actinic; Keratosis; Photosensitizing Agents; Dermatologic Agents; Aminolevulinic Acid
• Other Study ID Numbers: Daylight PDT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No