The Effectiveness of Intervention on Insulin Injection

September 14, 2020 updated by: Ruey-Hsia Wang, PhD, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

The Effectiveness of Intervention on Insulin Injection in Insulin-naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Application of the Transtheoretical Model

The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of an intervention for insulin injection initiation based on the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) for insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) proposed by Prochaska and Diclemente, people will experience different stages of change before the actual behavioral change takes place. Ineffectiveness of intervention to instigate behavioral change is largely due to failure to take into account the stage of change in which individuals are. The TTM suggests that decisional balance, which reflects the relative difference between pros and cons, is important for influencing the stage of change. In order to achieve behavioral change, the perceived pros of changing must be strengthened to outweigh the cons. In addition, individual must be self-convinced that the behavioral change is important for themselves. Furthermore, the process for behavioral change can be provided to facilitate behavioral change in individuals. The theory of TTM has yet been used to improve the behavior of insulin initiation in insulin-naïve patients with T2DM. Thus, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of an intervention for insulin injection initiation based on the TTM in insulin-naïve patients with T2DM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

151

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Lee's Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) diagnosed with T2DM for at least half a year; (2) aged 20-70 years old; (3) controlling diabetes only through oral medication, without previous experience in insulin injection; (4) HbA1c≧8.5% as measured more than twice in a year; (5) considered suitable and recommended by the doctor to initiate insulin injection.

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) unable to communicate with language; (2) incapable of self-administering insulin injection due to visual or muscular impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention arm
The arm that receives "TTM Intervention for Insulin Initiation." The intervention contains two parts: (1) individual intervention; (2) insulin injection follow-up management
The intervention contains two parts: (1) individual intervention; (2) insulin injection follow-up management. Different intervention strategies are applied to patients according to their stages of change.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control arm
The arm that receives usual care from the hospital that hosts the control arm. Participants in the control arm receives regular patient education.
Regular patient education on insulin injection at the control arm hospital.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Collected from blood test to assess the Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels
At baseline and 12 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diabetes Empowerment Process
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
A 13-item Chinese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale was used to assess the perceived level of empowerment by healthcare providers in participants. Each item was rated on a 5-point scale with scores ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The total score range from 13 to 65. A higher score indicated higher perceived patient empowerment.
At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Change in Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
An 8-item Chinese version of the short-form Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale was used to assess the levels of diabetes distress in participants. The response of each item was rated from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (serious problem). The total score ranged from 8 to 32. A higher score represented severer diabetes distress.
At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
A 15-item Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-Life Scale was used to assess the subjective appraisal of participants in their perceived degree to which their current health-related aspects in life were affected by emotional suffering, social functioning, adherence to treatment regimen, and diabetic-specific symptoms. Each item was rated from "very much" (0 point) to "not at all" (4 points). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. A higher score indicated better quality of life.
At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Change in Body Mass Index
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after the intervention
Physiological parameter which will be collected from body weight scale and height scale, and will be converted to body mass index (weight (kg)/ height(m) 2
At baseline and 12 months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruey-Hsia Wang, PhD, Kaohsiung Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on TTM Intervention for Insulin Initiation

3
Subscribe