- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03324984
1% Chloroprocaine(PF) vs. Bupivacaine Spinals
Comparison of 1% Chloroprocaine vs. Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Spinals in Patients Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomies in an Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The use of 1% Chloroprocaine (PF) spinal anesthesia will reduce the recovery times and discharge time of patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomies as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal. The primary objective is to compare the recovery times (return of motor and sensory function) and discharge time (voiding time) between 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomies. This is a randomized, prospective study assigning patients to either 1% Chloroprocaine (PF) or 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia group. Consents for participation in the study will be obtained during the patients' preoperative anesthesia evaluation. There will be no change in the primary anesthetic technique (spinal anesthesia), since these patients routinely get spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomies, however there would be a change in type of local anesthetic administration. On the day of surgery, consented patients will be randomized to one of the two groups. Both the patients and the researcher who recruited the patients and collected the data will be blinded. (Research assistant will hand an enclosed envelop to the anesthesiologists performing the spinal anesthesia with the name of local anesthetic to use) Postoperatively, the PACU nurse will be ask to document return of motor and sensory function in addition to voiding time. At the time of voiding, the nurse will be asked to inform an anesthesiologist (not involved in the case) for a postoperative evaluation and a discharge note. However, if the patient cannot void once there are able to ambulate, then they stay in PACU until they are the last patient in the unit. If still unable to void, the surgeon will be informed and an ultrasound bladder scan will be used to determine the volume of urine and the patient will be straight cath. The patient will be sent home and informed if he or she cannot void by the next day, then they should call the surgeon's office to notify them and go to the emergency room.
For postoperative data collection, the routine 24hr postoperative phone calls in which nurses make to patients will be utilize, however two additional questions will be asked, 1. Presence of nerve pain in the buttocks and thighs shooting down their legs unilaterally or bilaterally, 2. Inability to void, pass flatus or defecate. If any of the symptoms are present, then the nurse will inform an anesthesiologist (not involved in the case) whom will give the patient a call and advise them on treatment protocol. The research assistant will then be informed by the anesthesiologist who made the phone call.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
- Montefiore Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient undergoing anorectal procedures
- Age 18 and above
- American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status (ASA), I-III
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal
- Inability to understand and sign informed consent
- Allergic reaction to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics
- Coagulopathy (INR >= 1.5)
- Use of anticoagulant drugs (Plavix, Coumadin)
- Thrombocytopenia (Platelets < 100,000)
- Infection at the site
- Increased intracranial pressure
- Unstable spine, Spine abnormalities
- History of atypical cholinesterase (CP is metabolized by cholinesterase)
- Diagnosis of any disorders (i.e., benign prostatic hyperplasia, cystitis, vulvovaginitis) that would delay voiding
- Anticipated procedure time longer than 60 minutes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1% Chloroprocaine (PF)
1% Chloroprocaine is an ester-linked local anesthetic with the shortest duration of action of all local anesthetics.
|
In 2018, 1% Chloroprocaine was approved by the FDA for spinal anesthesia use.
|
|
Active Comparator: 0.75% bupivacaine
0.75% bupivacaine is a amino-amide anesthetic local anesthetic.
It is hyperbaric in nature due to addition of dextrose.
|
Bupivacaine is used on label
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recovery Time
Time Frame: On post-operative day 1 (POD1), approximately every 15 minutes up to 24 hours
|
For this study Recovery time was defined as the time (in minutes) to return of both motor and sensory function, postoperatively.
The return of motor function was tested by demonstrating mobility in both lower extremities including hips, knees, and lower legs using the Bromage scale.
The return of sensory function was assessed using light touch and/or pinprick techniques on the dermatomes corresponding with the T8-S2 spinal cord segments.
The duration in minutes when both sensory and motor function were re-established was documented and results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
In this study it is hypothesized that use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will reduce recovery times of patients undergoing anorectal procedures as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.
|
On post-operative day 1 (POD1), approximately every 15 minutes up to 24 hours
|
|
Discharge Time
Time Frame: On post-operative day 1 (POD1), up to 24 hours
|
For this study discharge time is defined as the time (in minutes) when the patient is "fit to discharge" from the Postoperative Care Unit (PACU).
At the institution where this study took place "fit to discharge" was defined as the ability to void and the ability to ambulate unassisted for at least 10 feet.
The duration of time when a patient was able to do both was documented.
Results were summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.
It is hypothesized that the use of 1% Chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia will result in a clinically significant 30% reduction in discharge times of patients as compared to 0.75% bupivacaine spinal.
|
On post-operative day 1 (POD1), up to 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evidence of Hypotension
Time Frame: On day of procedure, 0-5 minutes following administration of spinal anesthesia
|
Evidence of hypotension will be documented if systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops more than 20mmHg from baseline following spinal anesthesia.
Hypotension is a common side effect of spinal anesthesia (SA).
The number of participants with evidence of hypotension will be summarized by study arm.
|
On day of procedure, 0-5 minutes following administration of spinal anesthesia
|
|
Evidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS)
Time Frame: On post-op day 2, approximately 24 hours post operation
|
The number of participants demonstrating TNS approximately 24 hours following the procedure will be assessed.
TNS will be defined as back pain or dysesthesia that radiated to the buttocks, thighs, hips, or calves and began within the first 24 hours after surgery.
Localized pain or tenderness at the injection site or lower back without radiation will not be considered TNS.
TNS is clinically important as it causes patient pain and discomfort and, in severe cases, may delay discharge or cause readmission.
Symptoms will be summarized and reported by study arm.
|
On post-op day 2, approximately 24 hours post operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elilary Montilla Medrano, MD, Montefiore Medicial Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lacasse MA, Roy JD, Forget J, Vandenbroucke F, Seal RF, Beaulieu D, McCormack M, Massicotte L. Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):384-91. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9450-x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
- Kouri ME, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a comparison with lidocaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):75-80. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093228.61443.EE.
- Smith KN, Kopacz DJ, McDonald SB. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: a dose-ranging study and the effect of added epinephrine. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):81-88. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093361.48458.6E.
- Vath JS, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine: the effect of added fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):89-94. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000093360.02058.ED.
- Yoos JR, Kopacz DJ. Spinal 2-chloroprocaine for surgery: an initial 10-month experience. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):553-558. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130397.38849.4A.
- Hejtmanek MR, Pollock JE. Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Mar;55(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x.
- Apfelbaum JL, Walawander CA, Grasela TH, Wise P, McLeskey C, Roizen MF, Wetchler BV, Korttila K. Eliminating intensive postoperative care in same-day surgery patients using short-acting anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200207000-00010.
- Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1634-1642. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000180829.70036.4F.
- Forster JG. Short-acting spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory setting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Dec;27(6):597-604. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000126.
- Pollock JE. Transient neurologic symptoms: etiology, risk factors, and management. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):581-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.36457. No abstract available. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):257.
- Fanelli A, Ghisi D, Allegri M. Is spinal anaesthesia a suitable technique for ultra-short outpatient procedures? Acta Biomed. 2013 Jun 1;84(1):76-80.
- Pavlin DJ, Pavlin EG, Fitzgibbon DR, Koerschgen ME, Plitt TM. Management of bladder function after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):42-50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00010.
- Mulroy MF. Outpatients do not need to void after short neuraxial blocks. Anesthesiology. 2009 Dec;111(6):1388; author reply 1389. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bfa8d3. No abstract available.
- Teunkens A, Vermeulen K, Van Gerven E, Fieuws S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. Comparison of 2-Chloroprocaine, Bupivacaine, and Lidocaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy in an Outpatient Setting: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):576-83. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000420.
- Kim SW, Khandaker R, Muse IO, Pulverenti T, Goman M, Patel J, Yedlin A, Balikai CP, Levine R, Choice C, Montilla Medrano E. Comparison of 1% chloroprocaine hydrochloride versus hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal in patients undergoing anorectal surgery in an ambulatory surgery center: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec 31:rapm-2024-106130. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106130. Online ahead of print.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-8414
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia, Spinal
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedSpinal Anesthesia | Success or Failure of Spinal AnesthesiaKorea, Republic of
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompleted
-
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of TraumaRecruitingSpinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension | Geriatric Population | Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly PatientsPakistan
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedAnesthesia, Epidural | Anesthesia, Spinal | AntisepsisBrazil
-
San Salvatore Hospital of L'AquilaCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia; Functional | Spinal CordItaly
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedSpinal Anesthesia Evaluation | Analgesic | Intrathecal AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, General | Anesthesia, Spinal | Umbilical CordTurkey
-
University Tunis El ManarRecruitingSpinal AnesthesiaTunisia
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceNot yet recruiting
-
Tongji HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on 1% chloroprocaine
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityNot yet recruiting
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityActive, not recruitingCesarean SectionUnited States
-
Sintetica SACompletedHernia, Inguinal | Flat FootItaly, Spain
-
Sintetica SACross S.A.CompletedShort Duration Lower Limb Surgery Via Spinal AnaesthesiaItaly
-
Sintetica SASintesi Research SrlCompletedNeurological Complication, in Particular TNS or CESBelgium
-
Duke UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Sintetica SACompletedCataractItaly, Slovakia, Spain
-
Aretaieion University HospitalRecruitingCesarean Section | Local AnestheticGreece
-
Hôpital de la Croix-RousseHospices Civils de LyonCompletedLower Limb Arthroplasty Under Chloroprocaine Spinal AnesthesiaFrance