Impact of Local Steroid Application in Extreme Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

November 18, 2020 updated by: Kern Singh, Rush University Medical Center

Neural injury is a well-known complication following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF). It has been found that up to 9.4% of patients will have either temporary or persistent neurologic deficit. This occurs with traversal of the psoas muscle or direct injury to lumbosacral plexus or sympathetic ganglion. While often temporary, it can cause hip flexor weakness, thigh numbness, or pain.

Several studies have demonstrated reduced patient reported pain scores following steroid administration, particularly in the early postoperative period. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of intraoperative local injection of corticosteroid in reducing the incidence and duration of postoperative pain or neurologic injury for XLIF patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine if the incidence and duration of postoperative pain is reduced in the subjects receiving a local injection of methylprednisolone when compared to placebo following XLIF.

The investigators hypothesize that subjects undergoing XLIF who receive local methylprednisolone will have:

  1. Reduced incidence and duration of postoperative pain and neurologic injury
  2. Shorter hospital stay
  3. Better short- and long-term outcomes

The study also aims to answer the following questions:

  1. Do subjects who receive local corticosteroids have a reduced incidence and duration of postoperative pain and neurologic deficit compared to those who receive placebo?
  2. Do subjects who receive local corticosteroids have a reduced hospital stay compared to those who received placebo?
  3. Is local corticosteroid therapy associated with improved short and long-term outcomes?

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing a 1- to 2-level XLIF
  • Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes, and foraminal stenosis
  • Patients able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergies or other contraindications to medicines in the protocol including:
  • Existing history of gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Lumbar spine trauma
  • Unable to speak, read, or understand English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Local injection of methylprednisolone
Drug: methylprednisolone Injection of 80mg methylprednisolone injectable suspension at surgical site prior to incision closure
Injection of 80mg Depomedrol injectable suspension at surgical site prior to incision closure
Other Names:
  • Depomedrol
Placebo Comparator: Local injection of saline
Administration of saline at surgical site prior to incision closure.
Administration of saline at surgical site prior to incision closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: 2 year postoperative
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Back and Leg pain score from preoperative value will be assessed. VAS back and leg pain scores assess pain in each region on a scale from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable.
2 year postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Functioning
Time Frame: 2 year postoperative
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function score as compared to preoperative value. This score assesses physical function and is scaled from 0-100 with 100 indicating greater functioning and 0 indicating worse functioning.
2 year postoperative
Disability
Time Frame: 2 year postoperative
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score as compared to preoperative score. ODI assesses disability out of a total of 50 points and is scaled to a percentage of total possible points with 0 indicating no disability and 100 indicating severe disability.
2 year postoperative
General health status
Time Frame: 2 year postoperative
Short Form (SF)-12 Survey scores as compared to preoperative values. SF-12 assesses general physical and mental health on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating superior health status
2 year postoperative
Narcotic Consumption
Time Frame: 2 year postoperative
The total amount of narcotic use for each subject will be recorded. Dosages of narcotics will be converted to morphine equivalents
2 year postoperative
Length of Stay
Time Frame: 1 week postoperative
The number of hours of hospitalization from entering the recovery room (time zero) until patient meets discharge criteria
1 week postoperative
Post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: 1 week postoperative
Post-operative nausea and vomiting, Gastro-esophageal reflux, Ileus, Venous thromboembolic events, Respiratory depression/airway compromise, Renal insufficiency, Wound Complications, Admission to the ICU
1 week postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on Methylprednisolone

Subscribe