Effectiveness of the Supportive and Palliative Care Review Kit (SPARK) for Cancer Patients in the Acute Hospital

April 7, 2022 updated by: National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Introduction

There is a rising need for palliative care services in Singapore due to a rapidly ageing population and an increasing incidence of cancer. Current existing resources are inadequate - novel models of care are needed to expand access to palliative care without requiring significantly more specialist palliative care manpower.

Oncologist-driven referrals to a palliative care consultation service is the norm worldwide, including Singapore. This results in variable access to palliative care due to differences in referral practices. Palliative care involvement is also often delayed. In this study, the investigators propose to test Supportive and Palliative care Review Kit (SPARK) - a novel integrated model of care in which the palliative care team co-rounds with the medical oncology team.

Specific Aims and Hypothesis

This study aims to evaluate the impact of SPARK compared to usual care. The study investigators hypothesize that SPARK will result in more advanced cancer patients having access to palliative care, and at the same time operate at lower net cost. The study investigators also hypothesize that the improved efficiency of SPARK will result in shorter hospital length of stay for stage 4 cancer patients.

Methods

A cluster randomized trial with step wedged design will be used to compare SPARK to usual care. Data will be collected on health services utilization and access to palliative care services. Net costs will also be compared between SPARK and usual care. Semi-structured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals will be used to explore differences in experiences of healthcare provision between both models of care.

Importance

Singapore has a rising prevalence of cancer patients who require palliative care input, but only a minority are able to access it at present. If the SPARK model of care proves to be a scalable and cost-effective way of expanding access to palliative care, more cancer patients can benefit from palliative care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7514

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169610
        • National Cancer Centre Singapore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 110 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted under the care of the medical oncology team in Singapore General Hospital will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients below 21 years old.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cluster 1
Control: 1-4 months; SPARK intervention: 5-20 months
An integrated model of care (SPARK care) in which the palliative care team co-rounds with the medical oncology team, supporting them in their delivery of basic palliative care, seamlessly stepping in and out to deliver specialist palliative care directly to patients when needed.
Experimental: Cluster 2
Control: 1-8 months; SPARK intervention: 9-20 months
An integrated model of care (SPARK care) in which the palliative care team co-rounds with the medical oncology team, supporting them in their delivery of basic palliative care, seamlessly stepping in and out to deliver specialist palliative care directly to patients when needed.
Experimental: Cluster 3
Control: 1-12 months; SPARK intervention: 13-20 months
An integrated model of care (SPARK care) in which the palliative care team co-rounds with the medical oncology team, supporting them in their delivery of basic palliative care, seamlessly stepping in and out to deliver specialist palliative care directly to patients when needed.
Experimental: Cluster 4
Control: 1-16 months; SPARK intervention: 17-20 months
An integrated model of care (SPARK care) in which the palliative care team co-rounds with the medical oncology team, supporting them in their delivery of basic palliative care, seamlessly stepping in and out to deliver specialist palliative care directly to patients when needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 6 months
Dates of hospital admission and discharge will be collected to measure hospital length of stay
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days from hospital discharge to hospital readmission
Time Frame: 30 days
Date of hospital discharge and date of subsequent hospital admission, if any, will be collected to measure this outcome
30 days
Referral to palliative care services
Time Frame: 6 months
Presence of referral to hospital palliative care consult service, home hospice or other palliative care services will be recorded
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NRSMFSP17101

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Services Research

Clinical Trials on SPARK intervention

Subscribe