Uroflow Measurement With Electromyography (EMG) to Identify Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS): Conducted on Healthy Children

November 9, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Micturition Reeductation in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Uroflow/EMG Measurement in Healthy Children

Nowadays there is a growing interest towards non-invasive assessment of urinary dysfunctions in clinical practice. The tendency to use uroflowmetry as a first-line screening tool is based on the inexpensiveness, time efficiency, comfort of the patient, etc. However, it is stated that uroflowmetry as a stand-alone study lacks the potential to make an accurate diagnosis. In regard to this, the International Continence Society indicated that the addition of pelvic floor electromyography might increase the accuracy of this assessment. Despite this recommendation, uroflowmetry in combination with electromyography has not been conducted in a healthy population.

The initial objective of this study was to examine whether adding electromyography to standard uroflowmetry in a healthy paediatric population would change the representation of parameters, especially of voiding patterns. In addition, the influence of several factors on uroflow parameters was analysed to complement current literature.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ghent, Belgium
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

continent children with normal development: community sample

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Normal development

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (Recurrent) urinary tract infections
  • LUTS which interfered with daily life
  • Fecal incontinence
  • History of genitourinary or renal surgery
  • Medication for incontinence during the last 3 months
  • Pelvic reeducation during the last 6 months
  • Neurologic problems influencing continence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Immediate uroflow/EMG testing
Participants performed two direct repetitions of uroflowmetry in combination with EMG.
Uroflow measurement with superficial EMG testing of the pelvic floor
Ultrasound of post void residual urine
uroflow measurement beforehand
Participants performed a preceding measurement of isolated uroflowmetry, followed by two randomized measurements of either isolated uroflowmetry or uroflowmetry with EMG.
Uroflow measurement with superficial EMG testing of the pelvic floor
Ultrasound of post void residual urine
Isolated uroflow measurement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uroflow curve pattern - Clinical assessment
Time Frame: 2017
Interpretation by pediatric urologist
2017
Uroflow curve pattern - Mathematical assessment
Time Frame: 2017
Interpretation using Flow index methodology
2017

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal flow
Time Frame: 2017
Qmax (millilitres/seconds)
2017
post-void residual urine
Time Frame: 2017
millilitres
2017
voiding time
Time Frame: 2017
seconds
2017
voided volume
Time Frame: 2017
millilitres
2017

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011/766

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urologic Diseases

Clinical Trials on Uroflow/EMG

3
Subscribe