Selective Retina Therapy With Real-Time Feedback-Controlled Dosimetry for Treating Acute Idiopathic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in Korean Patients

December 29, 2018 updated by: Jae Hui Kim, Kim's Eye Hospital

Selective retina therapy (SRT) selectively disrupts the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with minimal damage to the photoreceptors. Previous studies have shown SRT to be effective for resolving SRF, while causing only minimal collateral damage to the retina and vision.However, most patients included in prior studies had chronic CSC (≥3 months symptom duration) and SRT efficacy on acute CSC is not fully known.

The current study evaluated short-term treatment outcomes following SRT with real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry in Korean patients with acute idiopathic CSC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a disorder that is characterized by a localized serous detachment of the neurosensory retina in the posterior pole. Additionally, CSC is often self-limiting and spontaneous resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) often occurs within several months. Although several treatment modalities (e.g., laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] therapy have been used in CSC patients, a consensus has not yet been reached on the optimal time for intervention.

Selective retina therapy (SRT) selectively disrupts the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with minimal damage to the photoreceptors. Previous studies have shown SRT to be effective for resolving SRF, while causing only minimal collateral damage to the retina and vision. However, most patients included in prior studies had chronic CSC (≥3 months symptom duration) and SRT efficacy on acute CSC is not fully known.

When treating CSC patients, it is generally recommended to follow-up several months without any intervention to identify spontaneous resolution of SRF. However, prompt treatment may be beneficial for some patients. For example, metamorphopsia or micropsia associated with CSC can greatly interfere with driving or with work when an occupation requires delicate procedures. Additionally, patients are often psychologically distressed by a CSC diagnosis and the accompanying decrease in vision-related quality of life. In these cases, prompt treatment to reduce SRF may relieve, at least in part, CSC symptoms and their related stress.

The current study evaluated short-term treatment outcomes following SRT with real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry in Korean patients with acute idiopathic CSC.

This study included patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naïve idiopathic CSC and were treated with SRT. The R:GEN device (Lutronic, Goyang-si, South Korea) was used to administer SRT. Inclusion criteria also included SRF involving the fovea (documented by optical coherence tomography [OCT] performed at initial presentation) and symptom duration shorter than 3 months. Patients were excluded from analyses if any of the following were true: (1) age > 55 years, (2) clinical or angiographic features suggestive of choroidal neovascularization, (3) OCT findings suggestive of type 1 neovascularization or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (e.g., double layer sign or fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment), (4) history of macular laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, or anti-VEGF therapy, or (5) history of exogenous corticosteroid treatment for a systemic disease (e.g., Cushing's syndrome or renal disease).

Examination, treatment, and follow-up All subjects underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy (90-diopter lens), fluorescein angiography (FAG), fundus photography, and spectral domain OCT (Spectralis HRA-OCT™, Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany or RS 3000™, Nidek Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Indocyanine green angiography using a confocal laser-scanning system (Spectralis HRA-OCT™) was performed at the discretion of each physician. A CSC diagnosis was based on FAG findings, in particular, evidence of a typical ink blot or smokestack leakage. A single examiner (J.H.K.) reviewed all FAG results.

All SRT was performed by a single physician (J.H.K.) using a Nd:YLF laser (wavelength of 257 nm, 15 micro pulses per spot, single micro pulse duration of 1.7 µs, pulse repetition rate of 100 Hz). Spot size was set at a diameter of 200 µm. Real-time feedback-controlled dosimetry (RFD) detects ultrasonic pressure waves generated by intracellular bubble formation and was used to determine optimal laser energy. Before applying laser energy to a leakage point, test shots were made immediately outside of the superior or inferior temporal arcade.

Optimal laser energy was determined based on real-time feedback system indications on the control panel. Laser energy began at 80 µJ and was increased in 5-10 µJ intervals until the optimal energy delivery was confirmed by the RFD system. Following confirmation, the optimal laser energy was applied to fluorescein leakages. If the energy was indeed optimal at leakage points, laser shots were administered around the leakages. If the energy was not optimal at the leakage points, laser energy was again increased in 5-10 µJ increments until optimal energy delivery, as confirmed by the RFD system. If the control panel indicated that excessive laser energy had been applied, the laser energy was decreased in 5-10 µJ increments until the optimal energy delivery was again achieved (confirmed by RFD system). The total number of laser shots delivered around fluorescein leakage points that were at or above the optimal laser energy were counted.

Patients had follow-up visits 1 and 3 months after SRT, at which BCVA was measured and OCT examination was performed. Central foveal thickness (CFT) was manually measured on OCT images and was defined as the distance between the RPE and the internal limiting membrane.

Outcome measures Both BCVA and CFT were measured at diagnosis, at 1 and 3 months following SRT, and at the final follow-up visit. The incidence of complete SRF resolution was estimated. Color fundus photographs taken at each follow-up visit also documented laser treatment and were used to check for the presence of visible laser spots. All BCVA measurements were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for data analyses.

Statistical analyses Statistical analyses were performed using a commercially available software package (SPSS v. 12.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Comparisons between BCVA and CFT measurements at different time points were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with a Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with treatment-naïve idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age > 55 years,
  • Clinical or angiographic features suggestive of choroidal neovascularization
  • Optical coherence tomography findings suggestive of type 1 neovascularization or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (e.g., double layer sign or fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment).
  • History of macular laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, or anti-vascular-endothelial growth factor therapy.
  • History of exogenous corticosteroid treatment for a systemic disease (e.g., Cushing's syndrome or renal disease).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment arm
Patients received selective retina therapy

The selective retina therapy (SRT) is a laser treatment to the retina using the R:GEN device (Lutronic, Goyang-si, South Korea).

Laser energy began at 80 µJ and was increased in 5-10 µJ intervals until the optimal energy delivery was confirmed by the RFD system. Following confirmation, the optimal laser energy was applied to fluorescein leakages. If the energy was indeed optimal at leakage points, laser shots were administered around the leakages. If the energy was not optimal at the leakage points, laser energy was again increased in 5-10 µJ increments until optimal energy delivery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subretinal fluid
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
Presence or absence of subretinal fluid which identified based on optical coherence tomography images.
3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity
Time Frame: At diagnosis, at 1 month, and 3 months after treatment
Changes in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity during the follow-up, which measured using visual acuity chart.
At diagnosis, at 1 month, and 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3-116571-AB-N-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Clinical Trials on Selective retina therapy

Subscribe