- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03348605
Descriptive Study of Receptive Fields in Lower Limb Amputees
Descriptive Study of Receptive Fields in Lower Limb Amputees and the Effect of a Related Stimulation System on Selected Gait Parameters
It has been observed that patients subjected to amputations develop so called receptive fields, which time of occurrence and localization over time are yet not examined systematically.
This clinical trial aims to investigate the reliability in detecting these receptive fields as well as their incidence and changes over time.
Further it aims to evaluate the acute effect of a stimulating system ("Phantom Stimulator" (Cort X Sensorics, Spaichingen, Germany)) on selected gait parameters measured tough a gait analysis system ("OprtoGait" (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy)) as well as on phantom sensations measured through a questionnaire.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
It has been observed that patients subjected to amputations develop so called receptive fields, which time of occurrence and localization over time are yet not examined systematically.
A receptive field is defined as skin area anywhere on the same side of the body as the amputation, which when stimulated by others, causes phantom sensations in the amputated extremity.
This clinical trial aims to investigate the reliability in detecting these receptive fields as well as their incidence and changes over time.
Further it aims to evaluate the acute effect of the stimulating system ("Phantom Stimulator" (Cort X Sensorics, Spaichingen, Germany)) on selected gait parameters measured tough a gait analysis system ("OprtoGait" (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy)) as well as on phantom sensations measured through a questionnaire.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Aargau
-
Bellikon, Aargau, Switzerland, 5454
- Rehaklinik Bellikon
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria for descriptive study:
a. Lower limb amputation (independently of side or height of amputation)
Inclusion criteria for Phantom stimulator:
- Receptive fields present at testing day 31 (last regular assessment of the receptive fields)
- Lower limb amputation below the knee (if both sides the system is applied to the dominant side).
Exclusion criteria:
- Implanted devices (defibrillator or pacemaker)
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: First setting ON
This arm performs the Gait analysis the first time after the familiarization phase with the stimulator in the modality ON.
The second time the gait analysis is performed in the OFF modality.
|
This system consists of a pressure sensing insole connected to regular TENS-Electrode patches which are applied to the receptive fields of the patients (evoking the sensation of heel and forefoot). The individually adjusted stimulation intensity on the systems regulatory box through a socked screw is set at the beginning of the testing phase, and not changed anymore. The current is applied to mimic the roll-off-sensation while walking. This is done by locating two sets of electrodes on the receptive fields representing the heel and the ball of the foot respectively. Now the current is applied in an alternating manner coordinated with the walking of the participant. The coordination is made able through the pressure sensing insole. |
|
Other: First setting OFF
This arm performs the Gait analysis the first time after the familiarization phase with the stimulator in the modality OFF.
The second time the gait analysis is performed in the ON modality.
|
This system consists of a pressure sensing insole connected to regular TENS-Electrode patches which are applied to the receptive fields of the patients (evoking the sensation of heel and forefoot). The individually adjusted stimulation intensity on the systems regulatory box through a socked screw is set at the beginning of the testing phase, and not changed anymore. The current is applied to mimic the roll-off-sensation while walking. This is done by locating two sets of electrodes on the receptive fields representing the heel and the ball of the foot respectively. Now the current is applied in an alternating manner coordinated with the walking of the participant. The coordination is made able through the pressure sensing insole. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Description of receptive Fields Size in cm2
Time Frame: 4-5 Weeks (7 hours)
|
The primary outcomes are the changes in size over time. Here the size is described in cm2. The Fields size will be recorded by drawing them on the skin with eyeliner and subsequently taking photos. Later, these photos are analysed with the computer program Photoshop. |
4-5 Weeks (7 hours)
|
|
Description of receptive Fields Position in % overlapping from first measurement
Time Frame: 4-5 Weeks (7 hours)
|
The primary outcomes are the changes in Position over time. Here the position is described in % overlapping with respect to the first measurement. The Fields position will be recorded by drawing them on the skin with eyeliner and subsequently taking photos. Later, these photos are put together and compared with the computer program Photoshop. |
4-5 Weeks (7 hours)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in gait parameters through Phantom Stimulator
Time Frame: 1/2 Day (3 hours)
|
The secondary outcomes are the change in selected gait parameters through the application of the stimulating system ("Phantom Stimulator" (Cort X Sensorics, Spaichingen, Germany)). These parameters are measured with the gait analysis system Optogait. The selected parameters are step length (cm), width (cm), cadence (steps/min) and speed (m/s). |
1/2 Day (3 hours)
|
|
Change in phantom sensations through Phantom Stimulator
Time Frame: 1/2 Day (3 hours)
|
The secondary outcomes are the change in phantom sensations through the application of the stimulating system ("Phantom Stimulator" (Cort X Sensorics, Spaichingen, Germany)). These changes are measured through a questionnaire witch uses the Visual Analogue Scale (values from 1 - 10). |
1/2 Day (3 hours)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marion Grögli, Dr. med., Reahklinik Bellikon
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 01_2017
- 2017-01621 (Other Identifier: SNCTP (Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal))
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD is used only internally the study concerning the Phantom Stimulator (Cort X Sensorics, Spaichingen Germany). The IPD is shared with the responsible investigative parties of the Rehaklinik Bellikon only.
It will be available to the participant after completion of the study. The data obtained from the Study results in a publication after completion of the study.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
-
Tezel Yıldırım ŞahanCompletedValidity and Reliability of The 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Individuals With Lower Limb AmputationLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeTurkey
-
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbHCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation KneeUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Behavior | Lower Limb Amputation KneeCanada
-
University of Nevada, Las VegasUnited States Department of Defense; National Institutes of Health (NIH); University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation at Hip (Injury)United States
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)Belgium
-
Sint MaartenskliniekCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
-
University of WashingtonCompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)United States
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)United States
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)Belgium
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting