The Influence of a Cognitive Behavioral Approach on Changing Patient Expectations in Shoulder Pain

March 20, 2024 updated by: Duke University

Background: Despite similar treatment outcomes for surgery or conservative care, the number of surgeries for the care of rotator cuff (RTC) related shoulder pain has increased. With the increase in surgery, there is an increased risk of harms, increased costs, and high re-tear rates. Patient expectations are beliefs or attitudes that include pre-treatment thoughts and beliefs regarding the need for specific treatment methods and the timing and intensity of these methods. Brief interventions designed to alter and enhance treatment expectations for conservative care and have been shown to improve patient expectations, but to date, no studies have explored whether such interventions can influence patient decisions to pursue surgical care. The investigators propose a comprehensive intervention that involves Patient Engagement Education, and Restructuring of Cognitions (PEERC) that is designed to change expectations, will reduce the likelihood that patients will choose to have shoulder surgery and improve functional outcomes. The cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approaches that form the core of our PEERC protocol are patient-centered and are designed to empower the patient in their own recovery process.

Purpose/Aims: To examine the effect of the PEERC protocol on the decision to have surgery (primary), and improve global well-being, pain catastrophizing, pain, functional outcomes, and follow up expectations (secondary).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke Sports Science Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 70
  • A rotator cuff related shoulder pain diagnosis
  • A mobile or land-line telephone
  • Ability to read and write English for completion of the self-report forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The investigators will exclude patients who have received or are scheduled for a surgical intervention for their shoulder condition
  • Demonstrate any evidence of cervicogenic pain and/or radiculopathy from cervical origin
  • Who demonstrate symptoms consistent with thoracic outlet syndrome
  • The investigators will also exclude individuals who are undergoing treatment for a serious psychological disorder (e.g., severe depression, psychosis).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Impairment Based Treatment
an impairment-based conservative intervention that has been created by compiling the evidence associated with established, effective treatment interventions for rotator cuff related shoulder pain.
Experimental: Impairment Based Treatment PLUS PEERC
Participants assigned to the impairment-based care plus PEERC condition will also receive the PEERC protocol. This protocol, informed by principles of CBT, involves three components: 1) engagement, 2) education and 3) cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation. A health coach who is responsible for engaging patients, educating them about pain modulatory mechanisms, and reinforcing cognitive and behavioral coping skills, will deliver the PEERC protocol.
This protocol, informed by principles of CBT, involves three components: 1) engagement, 2) education and 3) cognitive restructuring and behavioral activation. A health coach who is responsible for engaging patients, educating them about pain modulatory mechanisms, and reinforcing cognitive and behavioral coping skills, will deliver the PEERC protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pursuance of Surgical Intervention
Time Frame: 6 Months
The subject will be questioned if, after physical therapy, he or she will pursue surgery to address continued shoulder pain.
6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
Numeric Pain Scale- The NRS for pain is scaled from 0 to 10 (11 point scale) and is based on pain intensity. Overall pain intensity will be queried where 0/10 represents no pain and 10/10 represents the worst pain possible.
Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
Change in GRoC - Global rate of change
Time Frame: 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
The Global Rating of Change (GRoC) asks patients to report their global rating of change (GROC) relative to physical function, using a 7-point ordinal scale (where -7 much worse and +7 much better).
6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
Change in SPADI - Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability
Baseline, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
Change in MODEMS
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
The MODEMS patient expectation scale has been used by a number of studies and has shown validity in predicting outcomes in conservative and surgical interventions. As we previously stated, the instrument is a Likert-based scoring tool with a mean score of 5 out of 5 (indicating high expectations of positive outcomes) and a mean score of 1 out of 5 (indicating very poor expectations of positive outcomes)30
Baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
Change in TEGNER
Time Frame: Baseline, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
The Tegner Activity Scale measures the patient's perspective of function and activity as a numerical value between 0 (complete disability) to 10 (elite athletics)
Baseline, Discharge (estimated 3 months)
OSPRO 10 - Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome
Time Frame: Baseline
Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-10. The OSPRO is a review-of-systems screening tool that includes constructs associated with comorbidities, negative mood, quality of life, pain, and function
Baseline
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) assesses the extent of catastrophic thinking according to 3 components: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. It is a 13-item scale
Baseline
SANE - Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months
The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient reported outcome measure utilized to rate the patient's perceived level of function
6 months
Overall Satisfaction with Care
Time Frame: 6 months
Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction of care as "excellent" "good" "fair" or "poor"
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chad E Cook, PhD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Patient Engagement Education and Restructuring of Cognitions

Subscribe