Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Way of Organizing Primary Health Care to Improve the Management of Alzheimer's Disease (EvaMMADom)

August 17, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Way of Organizing Primary Health Care to Improve the Management of Alzheimer's Disease EvaMMADom

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a general practitioner (MG) management strategy guided by a multidimensional evaluation on the multidimensional score of fragility of patients with mild to moderately severe dementia, compared to those currently implemented (without the provision of such an assessment). The measurement of the respective effectiveness of the two types of care in primary care will itself be based on a multidimensional evaluation performed independently in the memory center having established the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of the impact of the strategy on the functional abilities of patients, the incidence of geriatric syndromes, cognitive functions, quality of life of the patient and the burden of the primary caregiver. The efficiency of the strategy will be assessed through a cost-effectiveness analysis. A survey of opinions will also be conducted among primary health care providers, carers and CMs on the implemented system.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Jean-Olivier ARNAUD, Director
  • Phone Number: +33 491381475
  • Email: drci@ap-hm.fr

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mathieu CECCALDI, PU-PH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with probable Alzheimer's disease, according to the criteria usually used in memory centers
  • Aged over 64 years with mild to moderately severe dementia syndrome
  • Volunteers for medical follow-up for a period of 20 months; Which the general practitioner attending agrees to participate in the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 65 years old
  • presenting with early cognitive decline or severe dementia
  • Not meeting the clinical diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease
  • Refusing or unable to sign informed consent to participate
  • Not voluntary for medical follow-up for a period of 20 months
  • Whose general practitioner refuses to participate in the research

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the multidimensional score of fragility (RAI CA)
A general practitioner (MG) management strategy guided by a multidimensional evaluation (RAI-CA) on the multidimensional score of fragility (RAI-HC) of patients with mild to moderately severe dementia.
Questionnaire for assessing deficits in Alzheimer's disease
Placebo Comparator: Usual care
support for patients without multidimensional evaluation (RAI-CA)
Usual clinical evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of multidimensional fragility scores
Time Frame: 20 months
The multidimensional evaluation score produced by Nurses in the home of AM patients and passed on to patients' doctors increases decision-making and patient care
20 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-54
  • 2017-A01582-51 (Registry Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Multidimensional fragility index questionnaire RAI-Home Care

3
Subscribe