Driving Pressure in Trauma

September 27, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Driving Pressure in Trauma. Morbi-mortality and Pulmonary Mechanics in Relation to Transpulmonary Driving Pressures in Patients With Chest Trauma. A Prospective Observational Study

Traumatic chest injuries are responsible for significant morbidity and the cause of trauma-related death in 20%-25% of cases. Thoracic trauma can include multiple injuries, mainly osseous (ribs, sternal fractures, flail chest), pulmonary contusions or lacerations, pneumothoraces and pleural effusions, and sometimes involve wounds to the heart and vessels (aortic dissection, cardiac contusion) or diaphragm. Following trauma, patients with thoracic injuries are at risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This worsening of respiratory function can lead to requirement for mechanical ventilation. In addition, changes to gas exchange may also be generated or aggravated by mechanical ventilation as a result of barotrauma, biotrauma, or ventilation-associated pneumonia. Many mechanical ventilation strategies have been tried in trauma patients in the last 30 years to determine the optimal method of maximizing gas exchange with minimal lung damage. The driving pressure of the respiratory system has been shown to strongly correlate with mortality in a recent large retrospective ARDSnet study. Respiratory system driving pressure [plateau pressure-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)] does not account for variable chest wall compliance especially in cases of chest trauma. Esophageal manometry can be utilized to determine transpulmonary driving pressure. A recent study suggests that utilizing PEEP titration to target positive transpulmonary pressure via esophageal manometry causes both improved elastance and driving pressures. Treatment strategies leading to decreased respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure at 24 h may be associated with improved 28 day mortality. However, currently no specific study with chest trauma patients exists. We propose to investigate the effect of hight transpulmonary driving pressure on duration on mechanical ventilation, length of stay and mortality in patients with sever chest trauma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Uhmontpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with sever chest trauma under mechanical ventilation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major patients (18-90 years old)
  • Affiliated to the social security
  • Hospitalized following severe trauma chest trauma
  • Mechanical ventilatory support for a minimum of 72 hours

Exclusion criteria:

  • Minor patients,
  • Patients under tutorship / curatorship,
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 1 day
Duration of mechanical Ventilation
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay in intensive care unit
Time Frame: 1 day
Length of stay in intensive care unit
1 day
Mortality
Time Frame: 1 day
Mortality
1 day
During of SDRA
Time Frame: 1 day
During of SDRA
1 day
Pulmonary compliance
Time Frame: 1 day
Pulmonary compliance
1 day
Pulmonary stress and strain
Time Frame: 1 day
Pulmonary stress and strain
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan CHARBIT, MD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on no intervention

3
Subscribe