Participant Satisfaction With Two Different Summative Assessment Methods - a Mixed Method Questionnaire Study

February 3, 2020 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Participants of Immediate Life Support and Advanced Life Support Courses, where two different summative assessment methods were used are asked about their satisfaction with the assessment method using a questionnaire. Both quantitative questions using an 11-point-Likert scale as well as open-ended qualitative questions will be asked. The primary aim of this study is to find out which variant of summative assessment is perceived by course participants as testing their leadership competency best, immediately after the comparison as well as 1 year later to identify any long-term effects on the students.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

428

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All 5th and 6th year medical students at the University of Bern, Switzerland, study year 2017/2018 and 2018/2019

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ERC
all students assessed by the methods used by the European Resuscitation Council
Other: different assessments
coded survey about NTS and assessment
AHA
all students assessed by the methods used by the American Heart Association
Other: different assessments
coded survey about NTS and assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant satisfaction with summative assessment methods during Life Support Courses
Time Frame: directly after assessment and 1 year later
evaluation of NTS assessed by assessment
directly after assessment and 1 year later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Greif, Prof., University of Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ILS_assessment_2017/2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Assessment Evaluation

Clinical Trials on different assessments

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Luxembourg

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe