Diode Laser for Treatment of Peri-implantitis (LAS)

May 2, 2021 updated by: Dena Hashim, University of Geneva, Switzerland

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Non-surgical Debridement With Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peri-implantitis is a major complication for dental implant patients, with its prevalence estimated in the order of 10% of implants and 20% of patients after 5 to 10 years of implant placement. When left untreated, peri-implantitis may cause progressive tissue destruction, esthetic complications and, eventually, implant loss. Despite numerous clinical trials and systematic reviews, studies have failed to identify a standardized protocol for the treatment of such conditions. Still, current literature and expert opinions recommend mechanical debridement of the implant followed by early evaluation and surgical intervention, implant decontamination using a wide variety of mechanical and chemical methods, then adjunctive systematic antibiotics. However, given the aggressive nature of surgical interventions, the inherent difficulty of decontaminating the implants' rough surfaces with conventional methods, in addition to the growing concerns over antibiotic resistance, the search for alternative approaches has become imperative. Since implant decontamination is the key aspect to resolution of peri-implantitis, different mechanical and chemical methods have been tested in that respect. In recent years, lasers have been attracting significant attention in this particular field. Diode lasers, in particular, have been shown to have potent bactericidal and photobiomodulatory effects promoting wound healing and tissue regeneration. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application in comparison with conventional surgical treatment with adjunctive systemic antibiotics for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions following an observation period of one year.

The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of non-surgical mechanical debridement with adjunctive repeated diode laser application (test) in comparison with conventional surgical treatment and adjunctive systemic antibiotics (control), for treatment of peri-implantitis lesions, following an observation period of one year.

40 subjects will be randomly distributed into two parallel groups:

  1. Test group (n= 20); receiving non-surgical mechanical debridement and adjunctive diode laser application at days 0, 7 and 14.
  2. Control group (n= 20); receiving initial mechanical debridement at day 0, followed by open flap debridement and prescription of post-operative systemic antimicrobials at day 14.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Genève 4
      • Geneva, Genève 4, Switzerland, 1211
        • University of Geneva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • At least one solid screw-type titanium implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis; which is defined as at least one site with probing depth ≥5mm, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration, and radiographic evidence of crater-form bone loss ≥2 threads after insertion of the final prosthetic supra-structure.
  • Sound prosthetic supra-structure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to Amoxicillin and/or Metronidazole,
  • Systemic diseases that could compromise wound healing (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV or bone metabolic disorders), radiation or immunosuppressive therapy,
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
  • Heavy smokers consuming >10 cigarettes/day,
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Participants not willing to attend regular dental maintenance visits and follow-up evaluations,
  • Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
  • Previous enrolment into the current study,
  • Active periodontal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser
Mechanical debridement of the implant surface using an ultra-sonic device with saline irrigation and plastic curettes, followed by soft tissue curettage using a metallic curette. Adjunctive sub-mucosal diode laser application according to the instructions of the manufacturer (settings: 810 nm, 2.5 W, 50 Hz, 10 ms), 3x for 30 seconds, using a 400-µm thick fiber (Doctor Smile Wiser diode laser, Orcos Medical AG, Küsnacht, Switzerland), will be performed three times at one week intervals (days 0, 7, and 14).
Laser treatment of the peri-implantitis lesion includes mechanical debridement of the implant using an ultrasonic device and plastic curettes followed by diode laser sub-mucosal application for 90 seconds. This is repeated two more times at one-week intervals.
Other Names:
  • Test
Active Comparator: Surgery
Active control includes mechanical debridement of the implant surface using an ultra-sonic device with saline irrigation and plastic curettes, followed by soft tissue curettage using a metallic curette at day 1. An open flap debridement procedure is performed at day 14 using normal saline for implant decontamination. Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials will be prescribed; Amoxi-mepha 500mg 3x/day and Metronidazole 500mg 3x/day, for 1 week. A chlorhexidine 0.2% mouth rinse will also be prescribed 2x/day for one week. Suture removal and prophylaxis are performed 7-10 days post-operatively.
Mechanical debridement of the implant will be done in a similar manner to the test group (without laser application) followed by open flap debridement 2 weeks after, and post-operative prescription of Amoxicillin and Metronidazole systemic antibiotics 3 times per day for a period of 1 week
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of the peri-implantitis
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as A absence of probing depths > 4 mm, bleeding on probing or suppuration at the end of the observation period
12 months
Types and frequencies of adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Any adverse events related or unrelated to the treatment administered is recorded at the time and appropriate treatment is performed. The frequency, duration and intensity is also recorded.
12 months
Patient reported outcomes at 1 week
Time Frame: 1 week post-operatively
A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate post-operative discomfort and patient's perception of the administered treatment 1 week post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating absence of pain and 100 being the worst pain imaginable.
1 week post-operatively
Patient reported outcomes at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
A visual analogue scale is used to evaluate general patient's perception of the administered treatment 12 months post-operatively.The scale measures a total of 100 mm ranging between 0-100; 0 indicating lack of discomfort or pain and complete satisfaction and 100 being completely unsatisfied and/or with persisting pain or other symptoms.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in marginal bone levels
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in peri-implant marginal bone levels are measured on intra-oral radiographs taken at baseline and 12 months post-operatively. Two independent examiners perform measurements and mean values are taken. This outcome is only calculated 12 months postoperatively.
12 months
Differences between groups regarding changes in mean marginal bone level changes
Time Frame: 12 months
Comparison in mean marginal bone level changes (outcome 4) are performed between the test and control groups
12 months
Number of residual pockets > 4 mm
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of residual peri-implant pockets exceeding 4 mm are measured around all included implants at the end of the observation period to asses the presence of any residual peri-implant soft-tissue inflammation
12 months
Changes in probing depth
Time Frame: 12 months
The change in mean probing depth between baseline and 12 months is calculated to assess treatment outcomes and disease resolution around all included implants. This outcome is calculated only once 12 months post-operatively.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on Laser treatment

Subscribe