ReInventing Yourself After SCI: an Intervention to Improve Outcomes After Spinal Cord Injury

ReInventing Yourself After SCI: A Multi-site Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Improve Outcomes After Spinal Cord Injury

The primary goal of this study is to conduct a multi-site RCT to evaluate the replicability and efficacy of the ReInventing Yourself after SCI intervention in improving health and function outcomes for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). A total of 252 participants will be randomized to one of three research arms: 1) Group treatment plus workbook (Group), 2) individual self-study through YouTube video plus workbook (Indiv), and 3) no treatment, no workbook (Control). Participants randomized to the Group arm will attend 6 virtual weekly group sessions led by a pair of group facilitators and will utilize the study workbook. Indiv arm participants will receive the workbook and will be instructed to independently access YouTube videos of the group session content. Control arm participants will not receive any intervention during the 6 week period. Participants in all three arms will be assessed at identical time points throughout the study: baseline, 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, and 46 weeks.

It is hypothesized that individuals in the Group intervention arm will show greater improvements after the six week intervention in SCI-specific and general self-efficacy, emotional well-being, increased societal participation, less depressive and anxiety symptomatology, and improved resilience than participants in the Indiv and Control arms.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Spinal Cord Injuries
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI structured group CBT; Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI study-specific workbook; Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI YouTube videos

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to conduct a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the replicability and efficacy of a structured six-week, manualized, group therapy intervention, ReInventing Yourself after SCI that delivers positive psychology concepts within a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based model. The goals of this RCT are to increase SCI-specific and general self-efficacy, enhance emotional well-being, and improve participation in society for people with SCI living in the community. Craig Hospital is the lead site for this study, collaborating with the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation in New Jersey.

The intervention is delivered through six sessions, each lasting approximately 2 hours. Eight skills are presented over the course of the intervention to address reframing a person's method of looking at events, building confidence by focusing on personal strengths, developing methods of recognizing and appreciating the good in one's life and expressing gratitude for positive attributes. These skills are presented in a specific sequence through a workbook so that participants can gain mastery of introductory concepts before undertaking those that are both more difficult and complex.

The RCT will have three research arms: 1) Group treatment plus workbook (Group), 2) individual self-study through YouTube video plus workbook (Indiv), and 3) no group or individual sessions, no workbook (Control). It is hypothesized that presenting the positive psychotherapy topics in an interactive structured CBT group format while restructuring maladaptive thought processes and providing experiential opportunities to reinforce behavioral change will result in increased self-efficacy, enhanced well-being and improved societal participation. Three specific hypotheses will be tested:

Hypothesis 1 (Primary): Individuals in the Group arm will show greater improvements after the six week intervention in SCI-specific and general self-efficacy, emotional well-being, increased societal participation, less depressive and anxiety symptomatology, and improved resilience than participants in the Indiv and Control arms.

Hypothesis 2 (Secondary): Individuals in the Group arm will maintain greater improvements through 46 weeks post-intervention in SCI-specific self-efficacy than participants in the Indiv and Control arms.

Hypothesis 3 (Secondary): Individuals in the Group arm will show greater improvements after six weeks of treatment and through 46 weeks post-intervention in general self-efficacy, life satisfaction, community participation, resilience, and less depressive and anxiety symptomatology than participants in the Indiv and Control groups.

The Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES) will serve as the primary outcome measure for this study. Secondary outcome measures include the General Self-Efficacy Scale, Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale, and measures of participation, resilience, anxiety and depression.

Each collaborating site will enroll 84 individuals to be randomized into one of the three study arms in waves of 21 people per wave (up to 6 waves per site). Training of site facilitators will take place at Craig Hospital.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 281
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Colorado
    • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
      • Craig Hospital
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
      • University of Michigan
  • New Jersey
    • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
      • Kessler Foundation

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• History of spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) at any neurological level
• At least 4 weeks post-discharge from initial inpatient rehabilitation
• English speaking in order to complete study measures and participate in group interactions
• Access to the internet and a laptop/desktop computer/smartphone with webcam and the ability and willingness to download Zoom software to join a video conference
• Able to provide informed consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with MS, Lupus, ALS, or Spina Bifida
• History of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
• Current participation in another RCT
• Unable to verbally communicate
• Unable to attend group sessions
• Active participation in another formal clinical group or psychological therapy
• Currently experiencing moderately severe or greater levels of depressive symptoms which would require more intense treatment than is provided in this intervention, as evidenced by a score of 15 or higher on the PHQ-9
• Has any medical or psychological condition that, in the judgment of the investigators, precludes successful participation in the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group; ReInventing Yourself after SCI structured group CBT and ReInventing Yourself after SCI study-specific workbook	Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI structured group CBT; ReInventing Yourself after SCI intervention integrates positive psychotherapy concepts into structured group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to develop optimistic self-efficacy beliefs, thereby strengthening resilience to emotional distress, enhancing a sense of well-being and promoting a more active lifestyle. The intervention consists of six weekly two-hour facilitator-led sessions that include didactic presentations of eight core skills and related experiential exercises with extensive group discussion.; Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI study-specific workbook; A study-specific workbook that incorporates positive psychotherapy concepts to develop optimistic self-efficacy beliefs, thereby strengthening resilience to emotional distress, enhancing a sense of well-being and promoting a more active lifestyle.
Active Comparator: Indiv; ReInventing Yourself after SCI study-specific workbook and ReInventing Yourself after SCI YouTube videos	Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI study-specific workbook; A study-specific workbook that incorporates positive psychotherapy concepts to develop optimistic self-efficacy beliefs, thereby strengthening resilience to emotional distress, enhancing a sense of well-being and promoting a more active lifestyle.; Behavioral: ReInventing Yourself after SCI YouTube videos; YouTube videos containing the content of the ReInventing Yourself after SCI structured group CBT sessions
No Intervention: Control; No group sessions, no YouTube videos, no workbook

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES) - assessing change over time	The MSES is a 16 item self-report measure of self-efficacy related to everyday life activities, designed specifically for persons with SCI. Individuals use a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very uncertain) to 7 (very certain) to rate their ability to perform 16 everyday tasks, with higher scores representing greater perceived self-efficacy. A Total Score, ranging from 16 to 112 is calculated by summing all item responses	The MSES will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)- assessing change over time	The GSES is a questionnaire designed to assess a person's ability to cope with a variety of difficult demands in life, with ten items scored using a Likert rating scale, ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true).	The GSES will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)
Diener Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)- assessing change over time	The SWLS will be used to measure global life satisfaction. This is a five item measure on which respondents rate their life satisfaction using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). A Total Score is calculated by summing each of the items, and has a range of 5 to 35, with higher scores representing greater perceived QoL.	The SWLS will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)
Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective (PART-O)- assessing change over time	The PART-O is a 24-item assessment of participation and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in measuring participation for people living with disabilities. An Averaged Total Score is computed by taking the mean of 17 items, with scores ranging from 0 (never participate in these types of activities) to 5 (almost always participate in these types of activities), with higher scores representing greater participation. This assessment will be utilized to measure overall participation.	The PART-O will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)- assessing change over time	The PHQ-9 is a 9 item scale that will be used to assess depression. Respondents rate the frequency at which specific problems have been bothersome during the past two weeks, using a four point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). A Total Score is calculated by summing all items, with higher scores indicating an increasing severity of depression.	The PHQ-9 will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)
General Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7)- assessing change over time	The GAD-7 is a brief 7 item measure that will be used to assess the severity of general anxiety. Using a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all sure) to 3 (nearly every day), respondents rate how often they have been bothered by specific symptoms during the past two weeks. A Total Severity Score, ranging from 0 to 21, is calculated by summing all items.	The GAD-7 will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) short form- assessing change over time	The CD-RISC 10 will be used to measure resilience. The measure consists of 10 items using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all of the time). The scale measures how the participant felt over the past month. The questionnaire produces an overall resilience score that ranges from 0-40, with higher scores representing greater resilience.	The CD-RISC 10 will be administered at baseline and subsequent follow-up assessments (i.e., 6 weeks, 14 weeks, 22 weeks, 30 weeks, 46 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Craig Hospital
• Collaborators: University of Michigan; Kessler Foundation
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Susan Charlifue, PhD, Craig Hospital

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 22, 2018
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): March 1, 2023
• Study Completion (Anticipated): March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 27, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 2, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): January 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 3, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 2, 2022
• Last Verified: June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Self Efficacy; Spinal Cord Injuries; Group Intervention
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Trauma, Nervous System; Spinal Cord Diseases; Wounds and Injuries; Spinal Cord Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: 90DPHF0002-01-00

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No