- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03391596
Internet-based Intervention for Enhancing the Psychological Well-being of Elderly Caregivers (CareACT)
CareACT - Internet-based Intervention for Enhancing the Psychological Well-being of Elderly Caregivers
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
It is well-known that stress, low quality of life and depression are relatively common problems among family caregivers. The proportion of elderly family caregivers is rapidly increasing which emphasizes the need for new support systems. Internet-delivered psychological interventions are one possible approach, offering benefits as they are more easily to achieve for family caregivers who often are home-bound with their relatives.
This study will examine whether an Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention would be effective, firstly, on reducing depressive symptoms, and, secondly, on improving well-being of elderly family caregivers.The family caregivers' depressive symptoms, perceived burden, anxiety, quality of life, psychological flexibility, personality and physical performance will be studied by a quasi-experimental study design comparing three groups of family caregivers (Group 1, experimental: Internet-based ACT intervention; Group 2, active comparator: Standardized institutional rehabilitation in a rehabilitation center; Group 3, other: Support given by voluntary family caregiver associations). Data collection will be performed at three time points: pre, 4 months and post (10 months).
Secondly, we also aim to examine demographics and psychological variables that could predict change in depression and perceived burden over time (pre, 4 months and post (10 months). A further aim of the study is to examine potential mediators on the effect of the interventions including psychological flexibility and suppression of thoughts. Moreover, we aim to study user experiences and satisfaction of the Internet-based program, i.e., how the family caregivers experience and accept the web-based ACT intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jyväskylä, Finland, 40700
- Gerocenter Foundation for Research and Development
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria for all groups:
- family caregiver
- at least 60 years of age
Inclusion Criteria for the experimental and active comparator group - depressive symptoms and/or psychological distress
Exclusion Criteria for all groups:
- parallel psychological treatment
- severe mental disorder
Additional inclusion criteria for the experimental group:
- computer and Internet connection or willingness to use a tablet provided by the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Internet-based ACT intervention
Group "Internet-based ACT intervention" will receive a 12-week Internet-based, acceptance and commitment therapy intervention
|
The Internet-based ACT intervention is a 12-week program based on the processes of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.
|
Active Comparator: Standardized rehabilitation
Group "Standardized rehabilitation" will receive a standardized rehabilitation program in the rehabilitation center
|
Standardized institutional rehabilitation in a rehabilitation center
|
Other: Support by caregiver associations
Group "Support by voluntary caregiver associations" will receive support given by caregiver associations
|
Support given by voluntary caregiver associations
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The BDI-II contains 21 questions about depressive symptoms and their severity.
The scale ranges from 0 to 63 and the items are summed (0 to 13 indicates no or very few depressive symptoms, 14 to 19 indicates mild depression, 20 to 28 moderate depression, and 29 to 63 severe depression).
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Carers of Older People in Europe (COPE): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
COPE is an assessment of carers' perceptions of their role as caregiver: negative impact, positive value and quality of support of caregiving in informal carers of older people.
It was developed in collaboration with several European countries as a brief first-stage assessment tool to identify caregivers who may need supportive interventions of any kind.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The WHOQOL-BREF instrument comprises 26 items, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.
The WHOQOL-BREF is a shorter version of the original instrument that may be more convenient for use in large research studies or clinical trials.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale: change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a self-reported questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of the four most common anxiety disorders (Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Panic Disorder, Social Phobia and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder).
GAD-7 has seven items, which measure severity of various signs of GAD according to reported response categories with assigned points (Not at all: 0 points; Several days: 1 point; More than half the days: 2 points; and Nearly every day: 3 points).
Assessment is indicated by the total score (min 0, max 21).
Higher GAD-7 scores correlate with disability and functional impairment.
5-9 points indicate moderate anxiety, 10-14 moderate and >15 severe anxiety.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Sense of Coherence (SOC-13): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The SOC-13 is derived from the original 29-item scale measuring different aspects of sense coherence.
Responses are made on a 7-point scale.The SOC-13 scale has three components: Comprehensibility (items 2, 6, 8, 9, 11; min 5, max 35), Manageability (items 3, 5, 10, 13; min 4, max 28) and Meaningfulness (items 1, 4, 7, 12; min 4, max 28) with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
This scale is rated on a 7-point likert scale, a total score can also be used and the coding for items 1, 2, 3, 7 and 10 should be reversed.
The subscales are combined to compute a total score.
SOC scores range from 13 to 91 with higher scores indicating a better outcome: more sense of coherence.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The AAQ-II is a measure with seven questions to be answered on a scale of 1 (never true) to 7 (always true) participant's willingness to be in contact with negative private events, acceptance of these events, and whether they can live in accordance with their values.
Summation of the scores results in a total mark ranging from 7 to 49, whereby a higher score indicates means a higher level of psychological flexibility, e.g. higher acceptance.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Experiential Avoidance in Caregiving Questionnaire (EACQ): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The EACQ is a scale measuring experiential avoidance in the caregiving context: 1. Active Avoidant Behaviors, 2) Intolerance of Negative Thoughts and Emotions Towards the Relative and 3) Apprehension Concerning Negative Internal Experiences Related to Caregiving.
The questionnaire consists of 15 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale.
Each statement can be answered by 1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: somewhat, 4: often and 5: a lot.
Factor 1 is made up of 6 items that measure caregivers' behaviors for avoiding negative thoughts related to caregiving (min 5, max 25).
Factor 2 include 4 items with content related to rigid verbal thinking about negative emotions/thoughts with regard to the care-recipient (min 4, max 20), the factor 3 composes of 5 items referring to reluctant attitudes towards negative thoughts regarding the relative (min 5, max 25).
The subscales are summed to compute a total score.
Higher values represent more avoidance, e.g.
worse outcome.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The WBSI is a 15-item questionnaire that is designed to measure thought suppression.
Chronic thoughts suppression is related to obsessive thinking and negative affect associated with depression and anxiety.
The scoring of the WBSI is based on a 5 point scale from Strongly disagree (1) to Strongly agree (5).
The total score (range from 15 to 75) is obtained by summing up the responses that are provided by respondents.
Higher scores on the WBSI indicate greater tendencies to suppress thoughts.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The 'Short Five' (S5): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The Short Five personality questionnaire is a 60-item questionnaire constructed for measuring 30 facets of the Five-Factor Model
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): change from baseline to 4 months and 10 months
Time Frame: baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand and balance tests (Guralnik et al., 2000).
It has been used as a predictive tool for possible disability and can aid in the monitoring of function in older people.
The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).
The SPPB has been shown to have predictive validity showing a gradient of risk for mortality, nursing home admission, and disability.
|
baseline, 4 months, post (10 months)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
User experiences questionnaire (developed by the research group)
Time Frame: 4 months (only experimental group)
|
The questionnaire developed by the research group includes 9 questions investigating experiences of the intervention as a whole and assessed its most beneficial aspects.
The first five questions are using a scale from 1 to 10 with answer options such as 1 = very unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied (question 1); 1 = not at all important, 10 = very important (question 2 and 4); 1 = very satisfied, 10 = not at all satisfied (question 3); 1 = has deteriorated,10 = has improved remarkably (question 5).
Question 6 assesses the current well-being situation including 7 options.
Question 7 assesses weekly time spent in the web program with 4 different options (less than 1 hour, between 1-2 hours, 2-3 hours and more than 3 hours).
The 2 last questions are open-ended questions.
|
4 months (only experimental group)
|
Closing interview (developed by the research group) questions
Time Frame: 4 months (only experimental group)
|
The questionnaire includes 9 questions investigating caregiver experiences with the web-based program.
5 of the questions are open-ended questions, 3 questions are close-ended questions which can be answered with Yes or No. Examples for questions: Question 1: What kind of experience was it to participate in this program?
Question 3:What have you learned from this program?. Question 4: Was the program easy to use?
One question (Would you recommend the web-program to other family caregivers?) includes a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (very likely).
|
4 months (only experimental group)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Riku Nikander, Professor, Gerocenter Foundation for Research and Development
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3E/2016
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaActive, not recruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Internet-based ACT intervention
-
University of AarhusKarolinska Institutet; Aarhus University HospitalCompleted
-
University of JyvaskylaSocial Insurance Institution, Finland; The Gerocenter Foundation for Research...CompletedQuality of Life | Depressive Symptoms | Psychological Distress | Burnout SyndromeFinland
-
University of JyvaskylaUniversity of Helsinki; University of Eastern Finland; VTT Technical Research... and other collaboratorsCompletedOverweight | Psychological Stress | Metabolic Syndrome Risk FactorsFinland
-
Anadolu UniversityNot yet recruitingMental Health Issue
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of Alabama at Birmingham; Oregon...RecruitingProstate CarcinomaUnited States
-
Istituto Auxologico ItalianoCompleted
-
Anadolu UniversityEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of CyprusUniversity of CreteUnknown
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingMalignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Terminated