Functional Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Tandem Lesions and Virtual Stenting (FORTRESS)

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis. Virtual stent implantation technique combined with QFR was recently developed to predict the functional significance of coronary stenosis as if the stenosis was revascularized.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of QFR in in tandem lesions with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. The secondary purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of QFR-based virtual stent technique in predicting the FFR values after revascularizing the culprit lesion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

QFR is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis by calculation of the pressure drop in the vessel. 3D coronary models can be reconstructed based on two angiographic projections to obtain the geometric parameters, including vascular diameter or cross-sectional area. According to the lesion stenosis, vessel curvature, conical geometry and reference lumen characteristics, pressure drop can be calculated in real time based on its relationship with blood flow. There is no need for pressure wire and adenosine / ATP induced maximum hyperemia compared with FFR.

The FAVOR Pilot Study and FAVOR II China Study showed promising results for diagnostic accuracy in consecutive patients. However, the diagnostic accuracy of QFR in specific tandem lesions needs further investigation. Furthermore, using the virtual stent technology to accurately assess the culprit lesion and choose the optimal treatment is significant in precisely guiding PCI surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

308

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with coronary tandem lesions admitted for coronary angiography due to high risk of significant coronary stenosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General inclusion Criteria:

    1. Stable and unstable angina pectoris or secondary evaluation of stenosis after acute MI;
    2. Age > 18 years;
    3. Able to provide signed informed consent.
  • Angiographic inclusion criteria:

    1. At least two localized lesions on the same coronary artery;
    2. More than 50% diameter stenosis (DS) estimated by QCA on each lesion;
    3. At least 10 mm relatively normal lumen (at most 20% DS) between two lesions;
    4. Reference vessel size > 2 mm in stenotic segment by visual estimate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General exclusion criteria:

    1. Ineligible for diagnostic intervention or FFR examination;
    2. Myocardial infarction within 72 hours;
    3. Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III);
    4. S-creatinine>150µmol/L or GFR<45 ml/kg/1.73m2;
    5. Allergy to contrast agent or adenosine;
    6. Factors that might substantially impact the angiographic image quality, e.g, frequent atrial premature beat or atrial fibrillation;
    7. Serious complications:

      1. Evidence of cardiac rupture;
      2. History of bleeding (intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.);
      3. Acute or chronic blood system diseases, including hemoglobin < 10 g / L, or platelet count < 50 × 109 / L;
      4. Accompanied by other diseases might inducing life expectancy shorter than several months;
      5. History of severe renal insufficiency and hypohepatia (liver failure, cirrhosis, portal hypertension and active hepatitis)
      6. Aneurysm, arterial / venous malformation, aortic dissection;
    8. Cardiogenic shock or circulation capacity failure;
    9. Two-degree and more severe atrioventricular block, with no permanent pacemaker implanted;
    10. Pregnancy or lactation;
    11. The investigators believe that the treatment regimen may be detrimental to the patient or the enrollment of this subject may affect the specific assessment of the trial;
  • Angiographic exclusion criteria:

    1. The interrogated stenosis is caused by myocardial bridge;
    2. Ostial lesions less than 3 mm to the aorta;
    3. Side branches of the bifurcation lesions with Median Classification of 111 or 101;
    4. Severe overlap or shorten of stenosis segment;
    5. Severe tortuosity of target vessel;
    6. Poor angiographic image quality precluding contour detection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of QFR in tandem lesions as compared with FFR prior to intervention
Time Frame: 1 hour
Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the concordance ratio of QFR evaluated outcomes (≤ 0.8 or > 0.8) with the reference standard FFR evaluated outcomes (≤ 0.8 or > 0.8)
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of QFR-based virtual stenting in predicting FFR values after revascularizing the culprit lesion
Time Frame: 1 hour
Diagnostic accuracy was defined as the concordance ratio of QFR evaluated outcomes (≤ 0.8 or > 0.8) with the reference standard FFR evaluated outcomes (≤ 0.8 or > 0.8)
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)

Subscribe