A Skills-Based Program Delivered Via Secure Live Video to Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma

August 16, 2018 updated by: Ana-Maria Vranceanu, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital

A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing a Skills-Based Program Called "A Toolkit for Optimal Recovery" Delivered Via Secure Live Video Compared to Standard Medical Care in Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Injuries

The aims of this study are to test a manualized mind body skills-building program aimed at preventing the development of chronic pain and disability following acute musculoskeletal injury in at-risk patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a pilot randomized feasibility trial of the mind body program Toolkit for Optimal Recovery versus usual medical care. The Toolkit is delivered via secure live video to patients at risk for chronic pain, at 1-2 months after injury. The primary aim of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the program, randomization, procedures and outcome measures. Secondarily, we report means and standard deviation and explore change in quantitative outcomes in the Toolkit compared to usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of musculoskeletal injury in the past 1-2 months
  • 18 years of age or older
  • English fluency and literacy
  • PCS OR, PASS score above median split

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major medical comorbidity expected to worsen in the next 6 months
  • Comorbid chronic pain condition
  • Antidepressant medication change in the past 6 months
  • Secondary gains such as litigations or workers compensation procedures
  • Diagnosis of psychosis, bipolar disorder or active substance dependence (by self report)
  • Unwilling or unable to use videoconferencing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury
The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (ToR) is a mind body skills based program delivered individually via secure live video. The format is a 4-week program with weekly meetings and a focus on teaching skills to optimize recovery and prevent chronic pain and disability.
The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (ToR) is a skills based mind body program that was designed to prevent the development of chronic pain and disability following an acute musculoskeletal injury (e.g., fracture). The program has 4 sessions and it is delivered via live video. Patients learn myth about recovery after injury, false and real pain alarms, the fear avoidance model and how to prevent the disability spiral, mindfulness based exercises and activity pacing.
Other Names:
  • ToR
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care
The Usual Care (UC) group will continue with their current medical care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of recruitment
Time Frame: 0 Weeks
We will report number of patients approached, number who agreed to participate/were screened, number of patients randomized
0 Weeks
Satisfaction with ToR
Time Frame: 4 weeks; 3 months
3 questions assessing satisfaction with the physical recovery, with the care delivered, and with the clinician.
4 weeks; 3 months
Acceptability
Time Frame: 4 weeks; 3 months
We will report number of patients who finished ToR and UC and completed post-test from those who started the study (were randomized); We will also report number of participants who provided 3 months follow up
4 weeks; 3 months
Feasibility of outcome measures
Time Frame: 0 weeks; 4 weeks; 3 months
We will report number of missing items and calculate reliability of outcome measures
0 weeks; 4 weeks; 3 months
Adherence to ToR
Time Frame: 4 weeks.
We will report number of participants who completed at least 3 out of 4 ToR sessions
4 weeks.
Adherence to homework
Time Frame: 4 weeks
determined by number of homework logs returned
4 weeks
Therapist adherence survey
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Items assessing whether the therapist taught each of the skills included in each of the 4 sessions
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0 to 52; higher scores indicate greater pain catastrophizing
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain Anxiety
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0-100; higher sores indicate greater pain anxiety
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Depression
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 0 to 60; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL); items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 17 to 85; higher scores indicate greater post traumatic stress
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Numerical rating scale assessing pain form 0 to 10
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Physical Function
Time Frame: 0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months
Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA); two scores are generated by summing items 1-34 for Function Index and 35-46 for Bothersome Index;
0 Weeks, 4 Weeks, 3 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014P001194

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture

Clinical Trials on The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury

3
Subscribe