Prevention of sPTB With Early Cervical Pessary Treatment in Women at High Risk for PTB (Prometheus)

May 4, 2020 updated by: Ioannis Kyvernitakis, Bürgerhospital Frankfurt

Effect of History-indicated Early Treatment With Cervical Pessary Versus Expectant Management Treatment With Rescue Cerclage in Cases With Cervical Shortening in Singleton Pregnancies at High-risk for sPTB on Children's Long-term Outcome

Prevention of preterm birth (PTB) is a key factor for a positive short-term and long-term outcome of the newborn children as mortality and morbidity are inversely related to gestational age at delivery. Consequently every week of prolonged pregnancy will have a tremendous effect concerning the outcome of the new-borns, subsequently for their parents and society as well.

The proposed RCT aims to evaluate the impact of a preventive pessary treatment on the prevention of preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy who are at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to a history of at least one previous preterm delivery and/or a history of previous cervical surgery. In accordance with the results by "van´t Hooft et al. 2016" an approximately 20% higher percentage of children's long-term survival without neurodevelopmental disability is expected for the pessary group in comparison with usual management (=control group) on basis of a reduction of prematurity < 34 week of gestation (WoG).

The primary outcome measure for the effect of the pessary treatment in comparison to expectant management will be the children's long-term survival (3yrs) without neurodevelopmental disability. Secondary endpoints assess the impact of a preventive pessary placement on the prevention of preterm birth and its resulting risk on mortality and morbidity for the neonates.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The "Prometheus Trial" is a prospective, multicentre, multinational, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial in parallel groups.

Up to now the risk factor previous PTB has only been investigated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) which is not available in most european countries or in RCTs where the risk factor previous PTB was combined with the risk factor cervical shortening.

Looking at the evidence of therapeutic effectiveness of vaginal progesterone these risk factors should be addressed separately. Vaginal progesterone proved to be ineffective in the prevention of recurrent PTB but effectively reduced PTB in women with a short cervix.

For cervical pessary therapy there is up to now only one cohort analysis for the combined risk factors available proving the placement of a cervical pessary to be as effective as cerclage or treatment with 200 mg vaginal progesterone in reducing preterm birth rate.

The risk factor 'history of at least one cold knife conisation' for PTB was up to now only addressed in a pilot study investigating the effect of pessary treatment in asymptomatic women with a singleton pregnancy along with a short sonographic cervix and it suggested a beneficial effect on the prolongation of the pregnancy.

In approximately 1/3 of pregnancies leading to PTB cervical shortening develops. Here the placement of a cervical pessary is a good therapeutic option. For this risk factor good evidence is available for cervical pessary treatment in singleton and twin pregnancies. This is the first RCT aiming to investigate the impact of a preventive cervical pessary therapy for the prevention of recurrent PTB in women with a history of PTB and/or history of at least one conisation.

Furthermore this RCT is a part of the first worldwide prospective metaanalysis in the medicine Global Obstetrics Network "http://www.globalobstetricsnetwork.org/projects/". The primary outcome "Children´s survival without neurodevelopmental disability at the age of 3 years" measures the long-time outcome of the intervention according to the CROWN criteria.

Cervical pessary treatment is a non-invasive, well-tolerated and cost-effective treatment option which could be easily implemented in daily practice if it proves to have a preventive effect of PTB. This especially applies for developing countries, where for example serial cervix length measurements to detect cervical shortening are not feasible.

Statistics:

The primary statistical aim is to compare the primary combined outcome "long-term survival without neuro-developmental disability at 3 years follow up" between the two treatment groups with a two-sided chi-square test. In general, statistical comparisons will be two-sided and use appropriate tests according to the scale of the outcome. A multivariate logistic regression will be fitted to control for possible confounders. Relative risks and 95% confidence interval as well as adjusted odds ratios will be calculated for the binary outcomes. Statistical significance will be accepted in all cases with a p≤0.05.

The main statistical evaluation will be performed at two time points.

  1. The complete data set for the secondary endpoints will be available after the last women enrolled in this study has delivered her neonate, so the analysis of these outcome parameter will be done right after this event.
  2. The primary outcome will be evaluated 3 years after the last woman enrolled in this study has delivered her neonate.

A descriptive analysis by preterm birth will be carried out calculating means and medians for quantitative variables and proportions with 95% confidence intervals for categorical variables.

Additionally an explorative subgroup analysis of the study collective will be performed comparing the efficacy of the cervical pessary treatment in women with a normal cervical length at 12 -16 weeks of gestation and in women who have developed a cervical shortening (< 25 mm) as an additional risk factor.

A drop out rate of up to 25% for the primary endpoint is expected due to the long follow-up time (3 years) of the study; but it is not expected to have lost data for the secondary endpoints because for these parameters the study has a short follow-up time till time to birth only.

An interim analysis shall be conducted on key safety parameters after birth of 150 neonates: the following safety endpoints will be assessed by a one-sided test with alpha=1%

  • on level of the neonates: rate of preterm birth, time to birth, birth weight, death, neonatal morbidity, harm of intervention
  • and on the maternal level: rate of hospitalisation for threatened preterm labour < 32 weeks, rate of PRoM <32 weeks, rate of infection / inflammation, rate of physical or psychological intolerance to pessary, rate of severe adverse reaction (SAR) / severe adverse event (SAE), death.

The trial will be terminated as negative if a disadvantage for the pessary-treatment can be found in one of these tests. To guarantee a high safety level the significance level is chosen more conservatively than in a Bonferroni correction. All analysis will be carried out with SPSS® version 19.0 or later ("IBM Company SPSS Inc." Headquarters, Chicago, Illinois. USA) and R version 3.2.3 or later (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Methods against bias:

  • all women will be randomly allocated to the cervical pessary group or the control-group in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization sequence is computer generated with variable block sizes using a web-based electronic case report form (e-CRF) (Online-Software Castor is a fully Good Clinical Practice compliant system) stratified for centers. The allocation code will be disclosed after the patient´s initials will be confirmed. The investigators or the trial coordinator will not have access to the randomization sequence.
  • Exclusion criteria were chosen to ensure an equal risk distribution for pregnancy complications and fetal morbidity / mortality rate for both study groups.
  • The study is open label since masking the intervention is not possible. Investigator training: All investigators should be trained in pessary application and cerclage placement. Quality protocols should be submitted according to the "Clara-Angela Foundation" -requirements for pessary placement.

Outcome assessors will be blinded to the interventions. Group allocations will base on an intention to treat basis with a per protocol allocation as sensitivity analysis.

The study will be registered and the study protocol is available. Outcome measures meet the core-outcome set for the evaluation of interventions to prevent PTB published by the CROWN-initiative.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

310

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Adelaide, Australia
        • University of Adelaide
        • Contact:
      • Berlin, Germany, 10249
        • Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain
        • Contact:
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charité - Universitätsmedizin
        • Contact:
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22087
        • Asklepios Kliniken Krankenhaus Barmbeck
        • Contact:
      • Homburg, Germany, 66424
        • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
        • Contact:
      • Athen, Greece
        • University Hospital of Athens
        • Contact:
      • Thessaloníki, Greece
        • Medical School of Aristotle-University of Thessaloniki
        • Contact:
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Vall D'Hebron University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of at least one previous preterm delivery before 34+0 weeks and/or a history of at least one previous cervical surgery
  • 12+0 - 16+0 weeks of gestation at time of randomization
  • only women with minimum age of 18 and capable of giving consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major fetal abnormalities
  • uterine malformation, placenta previa totalis
  • Cerclage prior to randomization
  • At randomisation: active vaginal bleeding and/or spontaneous rupture of membranes and/or painful regular uterine contractions
  • silicone allergy
  • current participation in other RCT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervical Pessary-Group
Cervical Pessary Group: placement of the cervical pessary (non-invasive) at enrolment including a transvaginal ultrasound to verify its correct fit. Removal of the cervical pessary (non-invasive) in a regular preventive examination at WoG 37
Intervention: Device: Cervical pessary: After Having excluded a vaginal infection insertion of the cervical pessary (silicone ring) directly after enrollment. After insertion verification of correct fit of the cervical pessary by transvaginal ultrasound. Removal of the pessary at 37+0 weeks of gestation, or before if any unexpected event occurs. Except for the insertion of the pessary the obstetrical management during the remainder of the pregnancy will be usual management.
Other Names:
  • Arabin Cervical Pessary
OTHER: Control-Group
Control-Group women receive management as usual; i.e. expectant management with interventions only in terms of a tertiary prevention of PTB according to guidelines for premature rupture of membranes, premature labour or other pregnancy complications
Intervention: Other: expectant management: expectant management is usual care; interventions only in terms of a tertiary prevention of PTB according to guidelines for premature rupture of membranes, premature labour or other pregnancy complications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Children's survival without neurodevelopmental disability at the age of 3 years
Time Frame: assessment of the newborn at age of 3 years (corrected age for prematurity)
  • mortality rate will be recorded
  • neurodevelopmental disability will be assessed by the Ages & Stages questionnaire and by medical examination at 3 years of age (corrected age for prematurity)
assessment of the newborn at age of 3 years (corrected age for prematurity)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of preterm birth
Time Frame: randomisation till birth, maximum 25 weeks
rate of delivery before weeks of gestation: 36+6 / 33+6 / 31+6 / 29+6 / 27+6
randomisation till birth, maximum 25 weeks
time till birth
Time Frame: days from randomisation till birth, maximum 30 weeks
time span from enrollment till birth
days from randomisation till birth, maximum 30 weeks
birth weight of the neonate
Time Frame: at birth
birth weight of the neonate in grams recorded at hospital
at birth
Fetal or neonatal death
Time Frame: at birth, first 24 hours after birth
death of the neonate before birth /within first 24 hours
at birth, first 24 hours after birth
Need (days) for neonatal special care unit
Time Frame: birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
Number of days the neonate is transferred to ICU for medical interventions other than supervision
birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
neonatal morbidity
Time Frame: birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
rate of major adverse neonatal outcomes: Intraventricular Haemorrhage III-IV, Retinopathy of prematurity, Respiratory Distress Syndrome II-IV, Need for ventilation > 72 h, Necrotising enterocolitis, Proven or suspected sepsis (antibiotics >5 days)
birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
harm from intervention
Time Frame: birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
recording any harm of the neonate deriving from the cervical pessary
birth till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
maternal death
Time Frame: enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
rate of maternal death due to pregnancy/birth
enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
rate of significant maternal adverse events
Time Frame: enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
rate of : heavy bleeding, cervical tear due to pessary placement, uterine rupture
enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
infection/inflammation
Time Frame: enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
rate of maternal infection and/or inflammation during pregnancy / birth
enrollment till discharge from hospital, recorded for at least first 48 hrs after birth
physical or psychological intolerance to pessary
Time Frame: time from placement of cervical pessary at enrollment till removal of cervical pessary at WoG 37, maximum 25 weeks
rate of maternal physical or psychological intolerance to pessary during pregnancy
time from placement of cervical pessary at enrollment till removal of cervical pessary at WoG 37, maximum 25 weeks
Hospitalisation for threatened preterm labour before 31+6 weeks
Time Frame: randomization till birth, maximum 20 weeks
Hospitalisation for threatened preterm labour before 31+6 weeks: recording of days of hospitalisation and tocolytic treatment: type / days / dose
randomization till birth, maximum 20 weeks
premature rupture of membranes (PRoM) before 31+6 weeks
Time Frame: randomization till birth, maximum 20 weeks
rate of women with premature rupture of membranes (PRoM) before 31+6 weeks
randomization till birth, maximum 20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ioannis Kyvernitakis, MD, PhD, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth

Clinical Trials on cervical pessary

3
Subscribe