Personalised HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial

November 11, 2020 updated by: Richie Gill, University of Bath

Personalised Subject Specific HTO Versus Generic HTO Virtual Clinical Trial

High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is an alternative to knee replacement in suitable patients with early knee osteoarthritis (OA), it is particularly suited to patients with single compart disease who otherwise would be suitable for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). OA of the knee is very common and increasing driven by the ageing of the population. The current limitations of HTO are related to the difficulty of achieving the desired correction due to a challenging surgical technique and soft tissue irritation due to the use of generic stabilisation plates. This study will examine the safety equivalence of a new patient specific HTO process which has patient specific 3D printed plates, i.e. personalised HTO plates, with the existing most commonly used HTO procedure using the Tomofix generic HTO plate. Importantly this study will be undertaken as a Virtual Trial, existing anonymised 3D imaging data will be used to create the virtual patient cohort. This cohort will receive both procedures, which for this type of procedure is only possible in a virtual scenario.

The main question to be addressed is: "Is the personalised HTO procedure as safe as the most commonly used existing generic HTO procedure?". In this context safety concerns the mechanical loads placed upon the tibia and the support plate.

The interventions will all be made on computer models, the 3D imaging data will be used to create the intact (un-operated) models of the subject tibias. Each model will then be virtually operated upon, with both the personalised and generic HTO procedures. The models will then be loaded with physiological loads experienced during function and the mechanical states compared.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ethical approval was obtained to use CT scans of 30 patients with moderate to severe knee arthritis (REC reference: 17/HRA/0033, Royal Devon & Exeter National Health Service [NHS], UK).

The CT data will be used to generate the 3D geometry of each patient's proximal tibia. The osteotomy correction angle required for each patient such that the altered mechanical axis will pass through a point 62.5% of the distance from medial to lateral tibial plateau. Virtual HTO surgery will be performed on each patient to alter the mechanical axis of the knee by creating an opening wedge osteotomy.

After the virtual surgeries are performed, each virtual patient will be duplicated. One copy will have the osteotomy stabilised using a Generic plate and the other using a Personalised plate, thus forming the two arms of the trial.

For each participant in each arm finite element (FE) models will be created, and loads applied simulating walking, sit to stand and squatting. Four healings stages will be considered, stage 1 being immediately post-operation (this will not be modelled), stage 2 representing 2 weeks post-operation, stage 3 representing 6 weeks and stage 4 representing 12 weeks. The mechanical loads in the plates, and around the screw locations in the bone, will be established by solving these finite element models.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bath, United Kingdom, BA2 7AY
        • University of Bath
    • Devon
      • Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom, EX2 5DW
        • Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population was recruited from waiting list of patients with knee OA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Appropriate existing CT data of lower limb.
  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with moderate to severe OA of the knee.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal anatomy of tibia or presence of pathology other than OA, e.g. bone tumour.
  • Previous knee or osteotomy surgery.
  • Presence of metal-work

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
All study participants
All virtual participants who received a virtual opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. The baseline information was the individual CT-based geometry of tibia.
Realignment of knee by creating an opening wedge osteotomy in the upper part of the tibia. Since this is a virtual trial, the virtual patients were duplicated and enrolled into both arms
Other Names:
  • HTO
Subject specific custom plate for stabilizing an open wedge HTO
Other Names:
  • Personalised plate
Generic plate for stabilizing an open wedge HTO
Other Names:
  • Generic plate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical Stress in Plate During Gait
Time Frame: 6 weeks simulated post-operation
Mechanical stress (Von Mises) calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis
6 weeks simulated post-operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mechanical Strain in Bone Around Screws During Gait
Time Frame: 6 weeks simulated post-operation
Mechanical strain calculated for functional loading using finite element analysis, note strain is dimensionless and hence has no units
6 weeks simulated post-operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richie Gill, DPhil, University of Bath
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Toms, MD, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Virtual cohort may be re-used for further studies, all virtual patients are anonymized

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

3
Subscribe