Motor Imagery Exercise and Tongue Strength

April 15, 2019 updated by: University of South Florida

The Effects of a Motor Imagery Exercise Program on Tongue Strength

This research study is a six-week treatment pilot study to compare the effects of different exercise types on measures of tongue strength and swallowing pressure in typically aging older adults. Typically-aging older adults represent a group "at risk" for dysphagia secondary to sarcopenia of striated musculature important to swallowing. Participants at all study sites will be randomly selected into one of four study exercise groups. At some study sites, the investigators will also determine cortical activation patterns differences during motor execution and motor imagery of tongue exercises between the groups using near-infrared spectroscopy. The results of this study will inform refinement/further development of the mental practice protocol to use with patients with dysphagia in future studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Although motor imagery (MI) has not yet been researched in the field of swallowing rehabilitation, the potential benefit is far reaching. Difficulty swallowing, or dysphagia, can occur in people who have a history of stroke, head injury, neurological disease (such as Parkinson's disease, ALS, etc.), and head/neck cancer. A person with dysphagia may have difficulty eating everyday foods and may require an altered diet, such as tube feedings or pureed foods. Because of this, having dysphagia is often associated with increased feelings of isolation and depression. Speech-language pathologists work with people with dysphagia to rehabilitate their swallow, with the goal of reducing their risk of choking and improving their ability to eat normal foods. The use of MI as a way to augment dysphagia rehabilitation has implications for patients who aren't safe to have any food by mouth as well as those who fatigue easily.

This research study is a six-week treatment pilot study to determine the effect of motor imagery for tongue strengthening exercises on measures of tongue strength and swallowing pressure in typically aging older adults. Typically-aging older adults represent a group "at risk" for dysphagia secondary to sarcopenia of striated musculature important to swallowing. Participants at all study sites will be randomly selected into one of four groups: 1) placebo (active jaw open against resistance/close against resistance/lateralize/protrusion exercises with relaxation exercises), 2) active tongue exercises against resistance only, 3) active tongue exercises against resistance + motor imagery of tongue exercises against resistance, and 4) motor imagery of tongue exercises against resistance only. In some participants the investigators will also determine cortical activation patterns differences during motor execution and motor imagery of tongue exercises between the groups using near-infrared spectroscopy. The results of this study will inform refinement/further development of the mental practice protocol to use with patients with dysphagia in future studies.

The research questions are as follows:

  1. Does a 6 week treatment of motor imagery tongue exercises with or without active tongue exercise improve tongue strength in healthy older adults compared to a 6 week treatment of placebo exercises and 6 week treatment of active tongue strengthening exercises?
  2. Does a 6 week treatment of motor imagery tongue exercises with or without active tongue exercise improve swallowing pressures in healthy older adults compared to a 6 week treatment of placebo exercises and 6 week treatment of active tongue strengthening exercises?
  3. Does a 6 week treatment of motor imagery tongue exercises with or without active tongue exercise alter cortical hemodynamic response patterns in healthy older adults compared to a 6 week treatment of placebo exercises and 6 week treatment of active tongue strengthening exercises? (JMU participants only).

The investigators hypothesize, based on previous research, that the group receiving both active and MI treatment will make the most gains in all three measures, followed by the active only group, then the MI only group, then the placebo group (control).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34243
        • Recruiting
        • Sarah Hegyi Szynkiewicz, PhD, CCC-SLP
        • Contact:
          • Sarah Hegyi Szynkiewicz, PhD
          • Phone Number: 941-359-4383
          • Email: sehegyi@usf.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 60-89
  • < 3 on EAT-10 (Eating Assessment Tool-10) (part of health questionnaire)
  • Mean of ≥2.5 on the KVIQ-10 questions (Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, short version), a screening questionnaire that assesses a person's motor imagery abilities
  • > 24 on MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination), a screening questionnaire that assesses cognitive abilities
  • Availability to complete a consecutive 6-week exercise regimen
  • Access to reliable transportation to and from study site for in-person experimental sessions
  • There are certain conditions that are common to the aging study population we are recruiting which will be acceptable: controlled hypertension and controlled diabetes mellitus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of diagnosed dysphagia (swallowing disorder)
  • History of a seizure(s)
  • Current or past problem with pain disorders involving the jaw muscles or joint of the mandible (e.g., TMJ (temporomandibular) disorder or myofacial pain disorder) - these are contraindicated for tongue strengthening exercises
  • Presence of oral piercings/oral apparatus that may interfere with tongue exercises
  • Medical conditions that would affect oral motor performance (e.g., history of acute or degenerative neurological condition, head/neck cancer), as determined by investigator
  • History of a diagnosed dementia or other cognitive impairment
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Active Jaw Exercise with Relaxation
Participants randomized to this arm will complete active jaw exercises and visualization relaxation exercise (control group).
This is the control group that will complete exercises unrelated to the primary outcome measures.
Active Comparator: Active Tongue Exercise
Participants randomized to this arm will complete active tongue exercises only.
This is the active comparator group that will complete exercises already shown to increase tongue strength measures.
Experimental: Active Tongue Exercise + Mental Practice
Participants randomized to this arm will complete active tongue exercises and mental practice of tongue exercise via motor imagery.
This is an experimental group that will complete active tongue and mental tongue exercises to assess effect on tongue strength measures.
Experimental: Mental Practice Tongue Exercise
Participants randomized to this arm will complete mental practice of tongue exercise via motor imagery only.
This is an experimental group that will complete mental tongue exercises only to assess effect on tongue strength measures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tongue strength change
Time Frame: Change from baseline tongue strength at 6 weeks
Maximum tongue strength as measured using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument.
Change from baseline tongue strength at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Swallowing pressure change
Time Frame: Change from baseline swallowing pressure strength at 6 weeks
Regular lingual swallowing pressure as measured using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument.
Change from baseline swallowing pressure strength at 6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cortical activation pattern change
Time Frame: Change from baseline tongue relative percent change in oxygenation at 6 weeks
Patterns relative changes of oxygenation during motor execution and motor imagery of tongue movements will be measured in some participants at the James Madison University study site using near-infrared spectroscopy.
Change from baseline tongue relative percent change in oxygenation at 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Hegyi Szynkiewicz, PhD, USF Sarasota-Manatee

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The privacy and confidentiality of the participants will be maintained. Each participant's identity will be disassociated from the participant's personal data - a subject number will be assigned to each participant upon signing of the informed consent. De-identified data will be shared between universities using a secure and password protected account.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data will be shared from the beginning of enrollment between universities using a password secure Box account and only de-identified data will be kept after the project ends.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data will be shared from the beginning of enrollment between universities using a password secure Box account to which all investigators have access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Clinical Trials on Active Jaw Exercise with Relaxation

Subscribe