Alpha Lipoic Acid and Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain

February 8, 2018 updated by: Abdelrady S Ibrahim, MD, Assiut University

Role of Alpha Lipoic Acid Combined With Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: Prospective, Randomized Study

In this study, we try to evaluate the effect of using ALA as an adjuvant treatment in patients scheduled for pulsed radiofrequency treatment (PRFT) of the affected dorsal root ganglion (DRG) for treatment of Lumbo-Sacral radicular pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design: The study is prospective, randomized, and open label started in August 2013 and was completed in March 2017 at Assiut University Hospital, Pain Unit after local ethical committee approval. All patients were informed verbally and in writing about the study, and they signed a detailed written informed consent about the procedure and the nature of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 7111
        • Assiut University Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years with severe chronic lumbo-sacral radicular pain of more than 6 months duration, not responding to medical treatment, and their Pain scores were > 7 were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • coagulopathy, surgical interference, advanced malignancy, known concurrent neurological or neurodegenerative disease, including those with impaired neurotransmission e.g. myasthenia gravis, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, breastfeeding or pregnancy, allergy/sensitivity to lidocaine anesthetic or/ and non-ionic contrast media or/and steroid therapy, active psychiatric or mental conditions and uncontrolled medical condition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group I
Each patient in this group was treated with pulsed radiofrequency on the affected dorsal root ganglion at 42°C for 120 seconds
Each patient in this group was treated with PRFT on the affected DRG at 42°C for 120 seconds.
Other Names:
  • PRF
Active Comparator: Group II
Each patient in this group was treated with pulsed radiofrequency as in group I plus oral alpha lipoic acid (ALA) 600 mg.
Each patient in this group was treated with PRFT as in group I plus oral alpha lipoic acid (ALA) 600 mg (Thiotacid 600 mg, EVA PHARMA, Egypt) three times per day (1800mg/day) for 3 weeks then 600mg once daily for 2 weeks.
Other Names:
  • PRF + ALA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Before treatment
The pain was evaluated using standard 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) with 0 being no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable.
Before treatment
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment
The pain was evaluated using standard 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) with 0 being no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable.
3 months after treatment
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
The pain was evaluated using standard 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) with 0 being no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable.
6 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radicular; Neuropathic, Lumbar, Lumbosacral

Clinical Trials on pulsed radiofrequency

Subscribe