Effects of Temperature Control Liner Materials on Long-Term Outcomes of Prothesis Use

This clinical trial will compare how many days per year people with lower limb prosthesis do not wear their prosthesis when fitted with a conventional liner and a liner made with phase change materials.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Skin Diseases; Artificial Limbs
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Prosthesis suspension liner

Detailed Description

Background: The proposed work will generate evidence-based practice guidance for temperature control liner technologies and allow providers to optimize care to Service members and Veterans with limb loss. Sizeable numbers of Service members and Veterans live with limb loss, mostly due to traumatic musculoskeletal injury. Addressing the resulting functional deficit with prostheses increases the risk for secondary conditions such as pressure sores, impaired blood perfusion, and injuries from accidental falls. Any of those occurrences can render the prosthesis temporarily useless, making it challenging for users to engage in many activities of daily life, including work, exercise, and social participation. Many of the described issues originate at the interface between residual limb and prosthetic socket, where the objectives of sufficient weight distribution and suspension are conflicting with the necessity to facilitate heat exchange and limit contact pressure and friction.

Recently, prosthesis liners that contain phase-change material have become commercially available, holding the promise that the micro climate at the interface between the residual limb skin and the prosthetic socket can be regulated to reduce the users' tendency to sweat. Preliminary studies on these liners indicate that the socket temperatures inside the socket stayed lower and rose slower than in conventional liners. However, the clinical relevance of those findings remains unclear. While (perceived) socket comfort is certainly an important criterion in prosthesis fitting, it may be claimed that only tangible functional benefits are of concern.

Objective/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether longer (6+ months) periods of use of phase-change material based temperature control liners have clinically meaningful effects.

It is hypothesized that use of phase-change material infused liners will improve prosthesis utilization (measured in days of prostheses use per time), physical performance (measured by 2-minute walk test), and self-reported prosthesis related quality of life (assessed by questionnaire). The research follows the rationale that lower and steadier skin temperatures should result in reduced sweat, friction, skin damage, and prosthesis abandonment. This would encourage users to wear their prosthesis for longer periods of time and for an expanded array of purposes, thus increasing their ability to ambulate and to engage in a greater variety of activities.

Specific Aims:

1. To compare phase-change material liners to conventional liners with regard to activity and participation
2. To quantify the effect of phase-change material liners on prosthesis related quality of life and physical performance over time
3. To investigate the relationship between perceived benefits of phase-change material liners and patient-centric outcomes

Study Design: The proposed study will utilize a double-blind longitudinal cross-over research design. A sample of trans-tibial prosthesis users will be wearing their regular gel or silicone liners for six months and phase-change material liners for another six months in a randomized sequence. Their prostheses will be equipped with activity monitors, and participants will be asked to maintain a record of days when they could not wear their prosthesis due to any perceived issues with their residual limb or socket fit. In 1.5-month intervals, subjects' activity, physical performance, and overall prosthesis assessment will be recorded using standardized methods.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 42
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15206
      • Bakery Square MSPO labs

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• use of a prosthesis with liner suspension,
• at least one year of prosthesis use,
• a well-fitting socket,
• a matured residual limb (stable limb volume) that has not required socket modifications in the previous year,
• the ability to walk with the prosthesis outdoors without notable limitations (K-Level 3),
• stable weight,
• absence of acute medical conditions that would temporarily affect the ability to use prostheses.

Exclusion Criteria:

• use of a non-standard liner size,
• current use of a PCM liner as the regular suspension system,
• known allergies against liner materials,
• any inability to understand the protocol and to comply with the associated tasks, such as maintaining a log of days when the prosthesis could not be used.
• anticipated provision of a new prosthesis or extended (longer than one month) absences from the region during the study period

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PCM liner; Willowwood Smart Temp Liner	Device: Prosthesis suspension liner; Liners out of phase change material will be fitted
Active Comparator: regular liner; User's regular prescribed liner	Device: Prosthesis suspension liner; Liners out of phase change material will be fitted

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Days Without Prosthesis	Days with less than 10% of prosthesis steps than the individual's daily average across the study period. Days without prosthesis are prorated to a full year (365 days) for comparison purposes.	6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Average Daily Step Count	A participant's daily step counts were averaged across days with prosthesis use across each intervention period	6 months per intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Goeran Fiedler
• Collaborators: United States Department of Defense; Widener University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Fiedler G, Singh A, Zhang X. Effect of temperature-control liner materials on long-term outcomes of lower limb prosthesis use: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3920-4.

Helpful Links

• Details on the PLUS-M mobility scale used for baseline assessment

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 4, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 30, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): September 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 5, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 5, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): February 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 5, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 15, 2021
• Last Verified: February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases
• Other Study ID Numbers: PRO17090574; W81XWH-16-OPORP-PORA (Other Grant/Funding Number: US Dept of Defense)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED
• IPD Plan Description: De-identified data may be shared in the future

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: Yes