A Prospective Trial to Compare Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold (DIBH) With Prone Breast Irradiation

February 16, 2023 updated by: NYU Langone Health
This phase II trial studies how well deep inspiratory breath hold or prone breast radiation therapy works in reducing cardiac dose in patients with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ. Deep inspiratory breath hold is a technique that involves a patient holding their breath during radiation to move the heart away from the breast to minimize radiation to the heart. Prone breast radiation therapy is a technique in which a patient receives treatment "face-down" to minimize the radiation to the rest of the body, including the heart and lungs. Comparing deep inspiratory breath hold to prone breast radiation therapy may help doctors improve radiation to the target while reducing radiation to healthy tissues surrounding the target.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients attend a simulation visit and undergo two CT scans, one in the prone position and one in the supine position with DIBH. Within 1 week after the simulation visit, patients undergo radiation therapy either in the supine position with DIBH or in the prone position daily for 15-30 consecutive days as per physician's prescription

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any woman with biopsy proven left breast DCIS or invasive cancer who has undergone a lumpectomy and who requires whole breast irradiation to the breast alone (and not to any nodal regions) as per the treating radiation oncologist

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous radiation to the ipsilateral breast
  • All pre-menopausal women will require a urine qualitative pregnancy test to exclude pregnancy; pregnant women will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Radiation Therapy (RT)
Patients attend a simulation visit and undergo two CT scans, one in the prone position and one in the supine position with DIBH. Within 1 week after the simulation visit, patients undergo radiation therapy either in the supine position with DIBH or in the prone position daily for 15-30 consecutive days as per physician's prescription.
Undergo RT either in the supine position with DIBH or in the prone position.
Other Names:
  • Cancer Radiotherapy
  • Radiotherapy
  • RT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean cardiac dose
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Assess whether the mean cardiac dose in the supine DIBH plan differs from the mean cardiac dose in the prone plan within strata defined by total RT dose.
Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume of heart receiving > 20 gray (Gy)
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The volume of heart receiving >20Gy in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The mean LAD dose in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Maximum left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The maximum LAD dose in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Mean ipsilateral lung dose
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The mean ipsilateral lung dose in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Volume of ipsilateral lung receiving > 20Gy
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The volume of ipsilateral lung receiving >20Gy in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Volume of the contralateral breast receiving > 5 Gy
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The volume of the contralateral breast receiving >5Gy in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Maximum point dose to planning target volume (PTV) breast
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The maximum point dose to PTV breast in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Maximum separation
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The maximum separation in DIBH plan vs. prone plan
Up to 6 weeks
Distance from the mid-sternum to the nipple when the patient is in the prone position
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Distance from the mid-sternum to the nipple when the patient is in the prone position
Up to 6 weeks
PTV breast volume as calculated on the prone scan
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
PTV breast volume as calculated on the prone scan
Up to 6 weeks
Change in distance between the chest wall and heart (at the most lateral portion of the chest-wall-heart interface)
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
The change in distance between the chest wall and heart (at the most lateral portion of the chestwall-heart interface) between the free breathing scout films and the DIBH scout films
Up to 6 weeks
Patient treatment plan (supine with DIBH or prone)
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Will be described by proportions and frequency distributions. Logistic regression will be used to assess how each of the covariates (primary and secondary endpoints) affects the probability of being selected to undergo RT using the supine DIBH plan. ROC curves will be generated for various cut-points of the true proportion of patients requiring the supine DIBH plan.
Up to 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naamit Gerber, MD, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-01477
  • s16-01477 (Other Identifier: New York University School of Medicine)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Radiation Therapy (RT)

Subscribe