- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03442296
Baltimore HEARS: Hearing Health Equity Through Accessible Research & Solutions (HEARS)
Baltimore HEARS Study: Addressing Hearing Impairment and Social Engagement Through Community-delivered Hearing Care
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
- Catholic Charities
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21215
- Weinberg Senior Living Communities
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 60 years or older
- English-speaking
- Aural-oral verbal communication as primary communication modality
- Post-lingual hearing loss (Audiometric pure tone averages [0.5-4kHz] in both ears >25 dB)
- Does not currently use a hearing amplification device or hearing aid
- Signed informed consent to participate in all study related activities
- Willing to regularly use listening device once provided for the remainder of their time in the study
- Hearing handicap as measured by HHIE-S score >8
- Able to follow study instructions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who do not fulfill inclusion criteria
- Evidence of ear disease or pathology requiring further medical evaluation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Immediate Treatment Group
Immediate treatment with Baltimore HEARS intervention
|
Tailored aural rehabilitation for participant and communication partner (if applicable)
Tailored fitting and programming of a personal sound amplifier.
This will be accompanied by a component of aural rehabilitation.
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Delayed Treatment Group
3-month delayed treatment with Baltimore HEARS intervention
|
Tailored aural rehabilitation for participant and communication partner (if applicable)
Tailored fitting and programming of a personal sound amplifier.
This will be accompanied by a component of aural rehabilitation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE-S)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. Higher scores indicate increased hearing handicap. Scoring: 0-8 suggests no hearing handicap 10-24 suggests mild-moderate hearing handicap 26-40 suggests significant hearing handicap Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in hearing handicap. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Measure was collected via a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. Score is the sum of 20-item self-reported measure. Scores range from 20 to 80. Score ranges: 20-34 - Low degree of loneliness 35-49 - Moderate degree of loneliness 50-64 - Moderately high degree of loneliness 65-80 - High degree of loneliness. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in degree of loneliness. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Depression in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Total of 9 questions, scored from 0 to 3. The score from each question are summed to a total score, which can range from 0 to 27. Interpretation of Total Score Total Score Depression Severity 0 No depression 1-4 Minimal depression 5-9 Mild depression 10-14 Moderate depression 15-19 Moderately severe depression 20-27 Severe depression. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in depression severity. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-12 (SF-12) Mental Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measures the construct of self-reported health-related quality of life. Here we report the mental component which relates to mental health functioning. Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better mental health functioning. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a better health state. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form -12 (SF-12) Physical Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measures the construct of self-reported health-related quality of life. Here we report the physical component which relates to physical health functioning. Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical health functioning. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a better health state. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Cohen Social Network Index (SNI): Network Diversity
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change from baseline in total number of high contact roles the participant interacts with at least every 2 weeks (such as family, friends, work).
Maximum of 12 roles included on the measure.
An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a more diverse network.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Cohen Social Network Index (SNI): Social Network Size
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change from baseline in total number of individuals in high contact roles the participant interacts with at least every 2 weeks (such as family, friends, work).
.An increase in the number of individuals from baseline (a positive number) indicates an increase in their social network size.
|
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Valuation of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
This self-reported 13 question measure asks the participant how much they agree or disagree on a 5 point Likert scale when asked a statement about the meaning of life and personal goals. Score ranges from 0 to 65. Higher score means higher value of life. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher value of life. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Computer Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported self-efficacy of computer use on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Device Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported device self-efficacy on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Listening Device Interest
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported self-efficacy of listening device interest on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 months post-intervention (Immediate Group) or 3 months post-baseline (Delayed Group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
This 5 question survey measures listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in different situations such as being able to understand a conversation in a quiet room to a crowded restaurant. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Maximum possible score is 50. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Complex Listening
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
This measure is the combined score of two questions where a participant self-reported their listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in complex listening situations. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Directed Listening
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
This measure is the combined score of two questions where a participant self-reported their listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in complex listening situations. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Dialog in Quiet
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
This measure is a participant's self-reported listening self efficacy on a 0-10 score scale in a dialog in quiet listening situation. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Maximum possible score is 10. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
Change From Baseline in Hearing Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
This 5 question measure asks participants about their hearing knowledge based on the information presented in the intervention. The score ranges from 0 to 5. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates more hearing knowledge. |
Baseline and 3 month post-intervention (immediate group) or 3 month post-baseline (delayed group)
|
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE-S)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. Higher scores indicate increased hearing handicap. Scoring: 0-8 suggests no hearing handicap 10-24 suggests mild-moderate hearing handicap 26-40 suggests significant hearing handicap. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in hearing handicap. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Measure was collected via a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. Score is the sum of 20-item self-reported measure. Scores range from 20 to 80. Score ranges: 20-34 - Low degree of loneliness 35-49 - Moderate degree of loneliness 50-64 - Moderately high degree of loneliness 65-80 - High degree of loneliness. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in degree of loneliness. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Self-reported Depression in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Total of 9 questions, scored from 0 to 3. The score from each question are summed to a total score, which can range from 0 to 27. Interpretation of Total Score Total Score Depression Severity 0 No depression 1-4 Minimal depression 5-9 Mild depression 10-14 Moderate depression 15-19 Moderately severe depression 20-27 Severe depression. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a worsening in depression severity. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form -12 (SF-12) Mental Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measures the construct of self-reported health-related quality of life. Here we report the mental component which relates to mental health functioning. Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better mental health functioning. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a better health state. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form -12 (SF-12) Physical Component Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) measures the construct of self-reported health-related quality of life. Here we report the physical component which relates to physical health functioning. Score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better physical health functioning. Change from baseline is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a better health state. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Cohen (Social Network Index) SNI: Network Diversity
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change from baseline in total number of high contact roles the participant interacts with at least every 2 weeks (such as family, friends, work).
Maximum of 12 roles included on the measure.
An increase in the number of roles from baseline (a positive number) indicates a more diverse network.
|
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Cohen Social Network Index (SNI): Social Network Size
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change from baseline in total number of individuals in high contact roles the participant interacts with at least every 2 weeks (such as family, friends, work).
.An increase in the number of individuals from baseline (a positive number) indicates an increase in their social network size.
|
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Valuation of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This self-reported 13 question measure asks the participant how much they agree or disagree on a 5 point Likert scale when asked a statement about the meaning of life and personal goals. Score ranges from 0 to 65. Higher score means higher value of life. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher value of life. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Device Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported device self-efficacy on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Computer Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported self-efficacy of computer use on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Attitudes Towards Computers Questionnaire (ATCQ): Listening Device Interest
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
A 5 question measure surveying self-reported self-efficacy of listening device interest on a 5 point Likert scale. Score ranges from 0 to 25. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This 5 question survey measures listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in different situations such as being able to understand a conversation in a quiet room to a crowded restaurant. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Maximum possible score is 50. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Complex Listening
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This measure is the combined score of two questions where a participant self-reported their listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in complex listening situations. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Directed Listening
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This measure is the combined score of two questions where a participant self-reported their listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in directed listening situations. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Adapted From Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ): Dialog in Quiet
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This measure is a participant's self-reported listening self efficacy on a 0-10 scale in a directed listening situation. Participants answer with a higher number the more confident they are in the presented situation. Maximum possible score is 10. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates a higher self-efficacy. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Change From Baseline in Hearing Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
This 5 question measure asks participants about their hearing knowledge based on the information presented in the intervention. Score ranges from 0 to 5. Change from baseline score is reported. An increase in the score from baseline (a positive number) indicates more hearing knowledge. |
Baseline and 12 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Carrie L Nieman, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.3.472.
- Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1983 Jul;25(7):37-42. No abstract available.
- Weinstein BE. Validity of a screening protocol for identifying elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA. 1986 May;28(5):41-5. No abstract available.
- Tuley MR, Mulrow CD, Aguilar C, Velez R. A critical reevaluation of the Quantified Denver Scale of Communication Function. Ear Hear. 1990 Feb;11(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199002000-00011.
- Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. No abstract available.
- Marrone NL, Nieman CL, Coco L. Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity. Ear Hear. 2022 Jul-Aug 01;43(Suppl 1):33S-44S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001183. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00144968
- R33DC015062-03 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Personal Communication
-
Naeem Ali, MDCompletedPersonal CommunicationUnited States
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Washington University School... and other collaboratorsCompletedCommunication | Personal Satisfaction | Decision Making | Anti-Bacterial AgentsUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCenters for Disease Control and Prevention; Population CouncilRecruitingCoping Skills | Violence in Adolescence | Adolescent Behavior | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Physical | Violence, Gender-Based | Communication, Social | Racism | Violence, Non-accidental | Communication, PersonalUnited States
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoNot yet recruitingBurnout, Professional | Communication Research | Communication, Personal
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); National...RecruitingViolence, Domestic | Coping Skills | Adolescent Behavior | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Non-accidental | Group, Peer | Emotional Abuse | Communication, PersonalUnited States
-
University of PittsburghCenters for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedViolence, Domestic | Coping Skills | Violence in Adolescence | Adolescent Behavior | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Physical | Violence, Non-accidental | Group, Peer | Emotional Abuse | Communication, PersonalUnited States
-
University of PittsburghThe Grable Foundation; Department Human Services, Pennsylvania; Fisa FoundationCompletedViolence, Domestic | Coping Skills | Violence in Adolescence | Adolescent Behavior | Violence, Sexual | Violence, Physical | Violence, Non-accidental | Group, Peer | Emotional Abuse | Communication, PersonalUnited States
-
Unilever IsraelUnknownPersonal Experience and Personal Initiation Program | Health Prevention Activities | Impact on PatientsIsrael
-
Fu Jen Catholic UniversityCompleted
-
Marmur MedicalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Baltimore HEARS
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery FoundationCompletedPersonal Communication | Age-related Hearing Impairment 1United States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingCognitive Impairment | Dementia | Hearing LossUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)RecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Personal Communication | Age-related Hearing ImpairmentUnited States
-
McMaster UniversitySt. Joseph's Healthcare HamiltonCompletedRespiratory Failure | Critical Care | Mechanical Ventilation | Intensive Care Unit Acquired WeaknessCanada
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityAbell FoundationCompleted
-
Children's Specialized HospitalUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyCompletedSpinal Cord Injury
-
Unilever R&DCovance; PhytopharmCompletedOverweight | Body Weight | Appetite DepressantUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalNot yet recruitingHematologic Malignancy | Graft Versus Host Disease