Effect of 4-session Metacognitive Training in Chinese Adult Outpatients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Major Depressive Disorder

January 22, 2020 updated by: Suzanne Ho-wai So, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Psychological studies have shown that individuals tend to attribute causes of positive and negative events differently. Specifically, individuals hold an internalising or externalising bias of attribution which, in the case of particular patient groups, was found to polarize to the extreme. Such extreme attributional styles have found to have a direct impact on emotions, leading to a waning course of psychiatric disorders. This project aims to further examine the theoretical links between attributions and emotions using a transdiagnostic approach, and the effect of a 4-session process-based intervention on attributional biases.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

113

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of non-organic psychosis or major depressive disorder
  • Presentation of delusions/a moderate level of depression

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of psychotic depression or depression with psychotic features
  • Primary diagnosis of substance misuse or learning disability
  • Participation of any cognitive/reasoning training program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Delusions (Tx)
4 sessions of Metacognitive Training using 4 treatment modules each targeting different cognitive biases
No Intervention: Delusions (TAU)
Active Comparator: Depression (Tx)
4 sessions of Metacognitive Training using 4 treatment modules each targeting different cognitive biases
No Intervention: Depression (TAU)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attributional style as measured by the Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire (IPSAQ)
Time Frame: 6 months
IPSAQ consists of hypothetical scenarios. Participants are required to think of a single, most likely causal explanation to each of the hypothesized situations, and then to categorize this cause as being internal, external-personal or external-situational.
6 months
Psychotic symptomatology as measured by Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is an interview-based assessment of the severity of symptoms associated with schizophrenia, including positive, negative, and general psychopathology.
6 months
Depressive symptomatology as measured by Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI-II) and Calgary Depression Scale (CDS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report inventory that assesses symptoms of depression. Scores can range from 0 to 63, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity. Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) is a nine-item structured interview scale that assesses depressive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.
6 months
Conviction of beliefs as measured by the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS) is a 17-item semi-structured interview measuring the severity of multiple dimensions of auditory hallucinations and delusions, including conviction and duration.
6 months
Belief flexibility as measured by Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Schedule (MADS) and the BADE task
Time Frame: 6 months
Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Schedule (MADS) is a standardised interview assessment that records whether participants could consider possibility of being mistaken (PM) about their delusional experience, any possible alternative explanations for the experience (EoE), and their reaction to hypothetical contradiction (RTHC). BADE task is an experimental design for measuring participants' bias against disconfirmatory evidence.
6 months
State-trait personality as measured by the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI)
Time Frame: 6 months
State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI) consists of 8 self-report scales, each containing 10 items covering state and trait anger, anxiety, curiosity and depression.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive capacity as measured by the Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III (WAIS-III)
Time Frame: Baseline
Three subtest short form - vocabulary, matrix reasoning and information - will be administered at baseline to assess the participants' cognitive capacity.
Baseline
Severity of generalized anxiety disorder as measured by Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 6 months
Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a self-reported questionnaire for screening and assessing severity of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). This scale consists of seven items that measure severity of various signs of GAD according to reported response categories.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Metacognitive Training

3
Subscribe