- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05358457
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Online Familiar Metacognitive Training (MCTf) (MCTf)
May 2, 2022 updated by: Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Online Familiar Metacognitive Training (MCTf) in Mothers With Psychosis and Their Adolescent Children
The objective of this study is to adapt and evaluate the efficacy of Familiar Metacognitive Training (MCTf) in mothers and adolescent children in a group context with the main purpose of improving family relationships, cognitive awareness and symptoms of women with psychosis and the knowledge of the disease by the children.
Secondary objectives: to evaluate the improvement in metacognition and social cognition, symptoms, protective factors and self-perception of stigma.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a randomized clinical trial will be carried out in which a group of mothers with psychosis and their adolescent children (between 12 and 18 years old) will receive the MCTf online and the other group will receive the treatment as usual.
In total, 48 mothers and their children will be recruited from a total of 11 adult mental health care centers.
Mothers will be evaluated with cognitive insight scales, other metacognitive and social cognition scales, symptoms, family and social functioning, protective factors (self-steem, resilience, and coping strategies) and self-perceived stigma.
The adolescent children will be evaluated with symptoms, metacognition and social cognition, family and social functioning, knowledge of the mother´s illness and protective factors scales.
The will be assessed at 2 times: baseline and post-therapy.
The Metacognitive training is a group psychological intervention that has demonstrated its efficacy in improve symptoms, insight, metacognition and cognition in people with psychosis.
Our hypothesis is that MCTf will be help the adolescents to better understand their mother´s thoughts and their understanding of metacognition and, consequently, to decrease anxiety and depressive symptoms.Furthermore, the investigators expect an increase in familiar and social functioning, as well as in protective factors such as: self-steem, resilience and coping strategies.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
48
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Susana Ochoa, Phd
- Phone Number: 12538 936406350
- Email: susana.ochoa@sjd.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Raquel Lopez, Msc
- Email: raquel.lopezc@sjd.es
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of one of the following diagnoses according to DSM-V criteria: schizophrenia, unspecific psychotic disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder.
- Mother of one o more adolescent (12-18 years old).
- Psychopatological stability in the previous 3 months.(without medication changes).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Head injury or intellectual disabillity (premorbid IQ <=70)
- Present scores on the PANSS >= hostility, lack of cooperation or suspiciousness, to guarantee a good relationship in the group.
- Patients with substance dependence disorder.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria of adolescents are: 1.age between 12 and 18 yerars old, 2. interested in the group. Exclusion criteria: Head injury or intellectual disabillity (premorbid IQ <=70).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Online Familiar Metacognitive Training
Metacognitive training for psychosis.
The MCTf consists of 11 therapeutic units developed during weekly sessions lasting 45 and 60 minutes.
Each unit contains abundant therapeutic material that includes psychoeducational information, exercises and case examples.The group will be composed of 3-4 mothers with psychosis and her adolescent children and two therapists.
The application of the intervention will be by a secure videoconfering method.
|
The original metacognitive training program consist of 8 therapeutic units and 2 complementary.
Seven of the therapeutic units address cognitive deviations and errors that are frequently seen in problem solving in schizophrenia, involved in the formation and maintenance of delusions.
The other three units work with metacognition and the aims of the progra, as a psychoeducation session, so in total the MCTf will include 11 sessions.
|
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will be receive treatment as usual (TAU).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
BCIS Beck Cognitive and Insight Scale (Beck et al., 2004; Gutierrez-Zotes et al., 2012)
Time Frame: baseline
|
This scales is a self-registering measure of 15 items.
It has 2 dimensions:self-reflection and self-certaintly.
A compound index of cognitive insight is obtained as the substraction of self-certaintly from self-reflection.Range 0-45.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline
|
BCIS Beck Cognitive and Insight Scale (Beck et al., 2004; Gutierrez-Zotes et al., 2012)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
This scales is a self-registering measure of 15 items.
It has 2 dimensions:self-reflection and self-certaintly.
A compound index of cognitive insight is obtained as the substraction of self-certaintly from self-reflection.Range 0-45.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
CBQ Cognitive Biais Questionnaire (Peters et al., 2013; Guiterrez-Zotes et al.,2021
Time Frame: baseline
|
Scale for the assessment of the most cognitive biases in psychosis.Higher values represent more biases.
|
baseline
|
CBQ Cognitive Biais Questionnaire (Peters et al., 2013; Guiterrez-Zotes et al.,2021
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Scale for the assessment of the most cognitive biases in psychosis.
Higher values represent more biases.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Jumping to conclusions (Garety et al., 1991; Dudley et al., 1997)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Scale for the assessment to the Jumping to conclusions bias.
3 tasks will be included.
JTC is considered if the decision is taken before the third ball.
|
baseline
|
Jumping to conclusions (Garety et al., 1991; Dudley et al., 1997)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Scale for the assessment to the Jumping to conclusions bias.
3 tasks will be included.
JTC is considered if the decision is taken before the third ball.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
IPSAQ, Internal, personal and situational Attributions Questionnaire.(Bentall et al., 1991; Diez-Alegria, 2006)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale assess the attributional style in different situations.There are no ranges.
|
baseline
|
IPSAQ, Internal, personal and situational Attributions Questionnaire.(Bentall et al., 1991; Diez-Alegria, 2006)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale assess the attributional style in different situations.There are no ranges.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
The Hinting Task (Corcoran et al., 1995; Gil et al., 2012)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale asses Theory of Mind.
Possible Range 0-12.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline
|
The Hinting Task (Corcoran et al., 1995; Gil et al., 2012)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale asses Theory of Mind.
Possible Range 0-12.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Face Test (Baron Cohen, 1997; Huerta-Ramos et al., 2021)
Time Frame: baseline
|
20 photographs that express ten basic and ten complex emotions.
Possible range 0-20.
Higher values representa better outcome.
|
baseline
|
Face Test (Baron Cohen, 1997; Huerta-Ramos et al., 2021)
Time Frame: after the intervention
|
20 photographs that express ten basic and ten complex emotions.
Possible range 0-20.
Higher values representa better outcome.
|
after the intervention
|
SFRT-2 .Situational feature recognition test 2 (Gomez-Gastiasoro et al., 2018)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scales assess social perception.
There are no ranges
|
baseline
|
SFRT-2 .Situational feature recognition test 2 (Gomez-Gastiasoro et al., 2018)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scales assess social perception.
There are no ranges
|
up to 11 weeks
|
FES Family Enviromental Scale (Moos et al., 1987; Fernandez-Ballesteros., 1995)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale include 3 dimensions: relationships, development and stability.
|
baseline
|
FES Family Enviromental Scale (Moos et al., 1987; Fernandez-Ballesteros., 1995)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale include 3 dimensions: relationships, development and stability.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
SWLS Satisfaction with life style (Pons et al., 2002)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale asses the degree of satisfaction of the person with their life in 5 items.
Self-administered.
|
baseline
|
SWLS Satisfaction with life style (Pons et al., 2002)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale asses the degree of satisfaction of the person with their life in 5 items.
Self-administered.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
PANSS.Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Kay et al., 1987; Peralta and Cuesta., 1994)
Time Frame: baseline
|
This scale measure 30 symptoms on a scale 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater psychopathology
|
baseline
|
PANSS.Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (Kay et al., 1987; Peralta and Cuesta., 1994)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
This scale measure 30 symptoms on a scale 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater psychopathology
|
up to 11 weeks
|
CDSS. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (Addington et al., 1990)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale assess affective symptoms.
Higher values indicate more symptoms.
|
baseline
|
CDSS. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (Addington et al., 1990)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale assess affective symptoms.
Higher values indicate more symptoms.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
SUMD. Scale of Unaweressness of Mental Disorder (Amador., 1993; Ruiz et al., 2008)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale assess awareness of illness in people with schizophrenia, according to the evaluator´s vision
|
baseline
|
SUMD. Scale of Unaweressness of Mental Disorder (Amador., 1993; Ruiz et al., 2008)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale assess awareness of illness in people with schizophrenia, according to the evaluator´s vision
|
up to 11 weeks
|
EEAG-Scale of Functioning (Endicot et al., 1976)
Time Frame: baseline
|
This scale measures the general functioning of the patient on a scale that ranges from 0 to 100.
|
baseline
|
EEAG-Scale of Functioning (Endicot et al., 1976)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
This scale measures the general functioning of the patient on a scale that ranges from 0 to 100.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Martín Albó et al., 2007)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Questionnaire to explore personal self-esteem understood as feelings of personal worth and self-respect.
The scale consist of 10 items.
|
baseline
|
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Martín Albó et al., 2007)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Questionnaire to explore personal self-esteem understood as feelings of personal worth and self-respect.
The scale consist of 10 items.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
CD Risk 17 (Serrano et al., 2013)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale assess resilience with a total of 17 items.
|
baseline
|
Coping Strategies Inventory (Tolbin et al., 1989; Cano et al; 2007)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale includes 8 scales that assess the frequency of use of primary coping strategies and the perception of coping self-efficacy.
|
baseline
|
Coping Strategies Inventory (Tolbin et al., 1989; Cano et al; 2007)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scale includes 8 scales that assess the frequency of use of primary coping strategies and the perception of coping self-efficacy.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
SSQ Self Stigma Questionnaire (Ochoa et al.,2015)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scales assess self-stigma.
It consists of 14 items and is self-administered
|
baseline
|
SSQ Self Stigma Questionnaire (Ochoa et al.,2015)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
The scales assess self-stigma.
It consists of 14 items and is self-administered
|
up to 11 weeks
|
PAM Psychosis Attachment Measure (Berry et al., 2006; Sheinbaum et al., 2013)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The scale assess attachment styles
|
baseline
|
CTQ-SF Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Bernstein et al., 1994; Hernández et al., 2012)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The self-report includes a 28-item test that measures 5 types of maltreatment - emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and emotional and physical neglect.
|
baseline
|
YSR Youth Self-Report (Achembach., 1991; Lemos et al., 2002)
Time Frame: baseline
|
It is an instrument to assess symptoms in adolescents between 11 and 18 years old.
|
baseline
|
YSR Youth Self-Report (Achembach., 1991; Lemos et al., 2002)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
It is an instrument to assess symptoms in adolescents between 11 and 18 years old.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
KASI The Knowledge About Schizophrenia Interview
Time Frame: baseline
|
Scale to asses the beliefs of the disorder
|
baseline
|
KASI The Knowledge About Schizophrenia Interview
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Scale to asses the beliefs of the disorder
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
WAIS-IV (Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale, 1955)
Time Frame: baseline
|
vocabulary subscale to explore premorbid IQ
|
baseline
|
TMT-A Trail Making Test, Retain, 1993
Time Frame: baseline
|
Visual attention and task switching.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
baseline
|
TMT-A Trail Making Test, Retain, 1993
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Visual attention and task switching.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
TMT-B Trail Making Test, Retain, 1993
Time Frame: baseline
|
Visual attention and task switching.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
baseline
|
TMT-B Trail Making Test, Retain, 1993
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Visual attention and task switching.
Higher values represent a worse outcome.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
WAIS-IV (Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale, 1955)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Digits subscale.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
baseline
|
WAIS-IV (Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale, 1955)
Time Frame: up to 11 weeks
|
Digits subscale.
Higher values represent a better outcome.
|
up to 11 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susana Ochoa, PhD, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 2, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
May 3, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 3, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 2, 2022
Last Verified
April 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI21/00012
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychosis
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFirst Episode Psychosis (FEP) | Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR)United States
-
University of UdineNational Research Council (CNR), Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB)...RecruitingClinical High Risk for Psychosis | Ultra High Risk for Psychosis | Attenuated Psychotic SymptomsItaly
-
University of New MexicoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedPsychosis | Clinical High Risk for Psychosis | First Episode PsychosisUnited States
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityNational Research Council of Thailand; Thanyarak InstituteCompletedMethamphetamine-induced PsychosisThailand
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineGuangzhou Psychiatric Hospital; Suzhou Psychiatric Hospital; Tianjin Anding Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingSchizophrenia; Psychosis | Clinical High Risk | First Episode PsychosisChina
-
University of California, San DiegoCenter for Medicinal Cannabis ResearchRecruitingEarly PsychosisUnited States
-
Yale UniversityCompleted
-
University of TorontoUniversity of British Columbia; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Queen... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPsychotic Disorders | Schizophrenia | Psychosis | Schizophrenia; Psychosis
-
Northwell HealthNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFirst Episode PsychosisUnited States
-
State reference center for psychosocial careUniversity of ValenciaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Familiar Metacognitive Training
-
University of WarsawMedical University of Warsaw; Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, WarsawCompletedPsychotic Disorders | Schizophrenia
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Shirley Ryan AbilityLab; Northwestern Memorial HospitalCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Coma | Minimally Conscious State | Vegetative StateUnited States
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingClinical High Risk for Psychosis | Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis | At-risk Mental StateAustria
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompleted
-
CHU de ReimsRecruiting
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Not yet recruitingDepression in Old Age
-
Maastricht UniversityMaastricht University Medical Center; Rijnstate Hospital; Adelante, Centre of...RecruitingCognitive Impairment | Heart Arrest, Out-Of-HospitalNetherlands
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompleted
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRecruitingDepressive Symptoms | Well-Being, PsychologicalGermany