Wound Dressing With Moisture Sensor

May 19, 2020 updated by: Fredrik Iredahl, Vårdcentralen Åby

Clinical Functional Assessment of Moisture Sensor on Wound Dressing

Explorative study of function of a moisture sensor on top of a superabsorbent wound dressing on exuding leg ulcers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The function of a novel moisture sensor placed on a superabsorbent wound dressing has been evaluated in a small clinical investigation. Five patients with leg ulcers were included. The investigational device, Absorbest Fuktsensor, was placed on the dressing DryMax Extra Soft. Two variants of the study product were used, Variant A and Variant B. The difference between the variants were that Variant B had an extra layer of a nonwoven between the moisture sensor and the dressing in an attempt to delay the activation of the moisture sensor a little compared to Variant A which was not equipped with this nonwoven layer.

The overall aim was to observe the function of the sensor in clinical use and practical operation. Further the aim was to evaluate the two combinations of Absorbest Fuktsensor and DryMax Extra Soft and decide which combination would activate the sensor display in a satisfactory way related to the utilization of the dressings absorbing capacity while avoiding leakage and maceration.

The study was performed accordingly to ISO 14155 and the declaration of Helsinki.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden
        • S2Clinic
    • Region Östergötland
      • Linköping, Region Östergötland, Sweden
        • Hudkliniken, University hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of moderate to highly exuding leg ulcer by clinician assessment
  • Wound deemed suitable for treatment with study product
  • Informed consent from the participants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoner
  • Bleeding from the wound
  • Known allergy to components
  • Wound infection
  • Mental illness
  • Illness or treatment of an indication other than the wound and which, according to the study personnel, can affect the wound treatment, the study and/or the dressing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A-B-A
Investigational device is Absorbest moisture sensor in variant A and variant B, placed on the backside of the wound dressing DryMax Extra Soft. Participants performed three dressing changes. They first received variant A, at next dressing change they received variant B, and on the third dressing change they received variant A again. No washout periods.
Study profile of sensor activation
Experimental: B-A-B
Investigational device is Absorbest moisture sensor in variant A and variant B, placed on the backside of the wound dressing DryMax Extra Soft. Participants performed three dressing changes. They first received variant B, at next dressing change they received variant A, and on the third dressing change they received variant B again. No washout periods.
Study profile of sensor activation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Dressing Changes With Sensor Activation at Correct Timing
Time Frame: Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Sensor activation - measured as indication on the sensor display; indication at correct time, indication but not att correct time, no indication.
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Timing of Dressing Change Related to Dressing Size and Weight After Use
Time Frame: Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks

Dressing weight after use were measured on a scale and recorded. The weight were compared to a predefined table.

Dressing size 10x10 cm:

Changed too early <11 g Correct change 11-26 g Changed too late >26 g

Dressing size 10x20 cm:

Changed too early <17 g Correct change 17-62 g Changed too late >62 g

Dressing size 20x20 cm:

Changed too early <26 g Correct change 26-109 g Changed too late >109 g

Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications if the Dressing Was Switched Too Late.
Time Frame: Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Report of leakage, strike-through and maceration at the time for dressing changes
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Level of Usability
Time Frame: Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Study the rate of handling errors
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Wound Size After Three Dressing Changes
Time Frame: At final dressing change no.3 (after 1-2 weeks)
Wound size after three dressing changes with the study device, measured as cm2. Can be compared with the baseline measurement of wound size.
At final dressing change no.3 (after 1-2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be analyzed and published on a group level.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcer, Leg

Subscribe