Cooperative Pain Education and Self-management: Expanding Treatment for Real-world Access (COPES ExTRA) (COPES ExTRA)

June 11, 2026 updated by: Yale University
To conduct a superiority trial of COPES versus standard Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Chronic Pain (CBT-CP)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Our prior efficacy trial found that COPES was not inferior to in-person CBT-CP and that participants attended, on average, a little over two more treatment weeks in COPES than in-person treatment, presumably due to the ease of in-home treatment attendance relative to in-person treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

764

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141
        • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Leeds, Massachusetts, United States, 01053
        • VA Central Western Massachusetts
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • Oklahoma City VA Health Care System
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401
        • Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75216
        • VA North Texas Healthcare System
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76504
        • VA Central Texas Healthcare System
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain receiving care in VHA.
  • A pain-related musculoskeletal diagnosis indicated by an EHR identified ICD-9 or -10 code.
  • The presence of chronic pain of at least moderate severity with EHR NRS pain scores ≥ 4 in three separate months for a period of 12 months.
  • Absence of mental illness serious enough to have resulted in an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization in the prior 3 months excluding detoxification of alcohol or drugs.
  • Absence of malignant cancer diagnosis or receipt of hospice or end-of-life palliative care.
  • Ability to participate safely in the walking portion of the intervention as evidenced by patient-reported ability to walk at least one block and absence of diabetic foot ulcers at the time of the enrollment.
  • Absence of significant cognitive impairment as identified by a dementia-related diagnosis.
  • Availability of a touch-tone land-line or cellular telephone and no vision or hearing deficits that would impair participation verified by patient report at the time of the enrollment call.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not fitting criteria for inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: data from veterans using COPES
Data from veterans using COPES for chronic pain
Cooperative Pain Education and Self-Management for chronic pain therapy.
Active Comparator: data from veterans using CBT-CP
Data from veterans using CBT-CP for chronic pain
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Brief Pain Inventory, Interference Subscale (BPI-I) Score
Time Frame: 4 months
The BPI-I Score is patient-reported pain-related interference. BPI-I score range is 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse functioning.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Brief Pain Inventory, Interference Subscale (BPI-I) Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The BPI-I Score is patient-reported pain-related interference. BPI-I score range is 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse functioning.
6 months
Mean Brief Pain Inventory, Interference Subscale (BPI-I) Score
Time Frame: 12 months
The BPI-I Score is patient-reported pain-related interference. BPI-I score range is 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse functioning.
12 months
Mean Pain, Enjoyment, General Activity Scale (PEG-3) Score
Time Frame: 4 month
The PEG-3 is a three-Item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and Interference. Data was collected through automated IVR calls with a range from 0-10. Higher scores indicate more pain impact (intensity and interference).
4 month
Mean Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) Score
Time Frame: 4 months
PHQ-8 is a Depression symptom severity scale will be assessed using the 8-item a widely-used measure with excellent internal consistency and stability.PHQ-8 score range is 0-24; ≥10 indicates clinically significant depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptomatology.
4 months
Mean Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)- Short Form
Time Frame: 4 months
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)-Short Form is a validated, 3-item self-report scale that examines thoughts and feelings people may experience when they are in pain. Total score range 3-15 with higher scores indicating more catatrophizing.
4 months
Mean Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Score
Time Frame: 4 months
Sleep quality was measured using the ISI and will assess subjective sleep quality. ISI score range 0-28, higher scores indicate higher sleep difficulty, (15 or above clinical insomnia).
4 months
Mean Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) Score
Time Frame: 4 months
Self-Efficacy will be assessed using 1-Item of the PSEQ.PSEQ score range 0- 10. Higher scores indicate higher pain self-efficacy.
4 months
Patient Global Perception of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Patient Global Perception of Change scale is a single item measure that quantifies a participant's overall perception of improvement since beginning treatment and the clinical importance of that improvement. Participants indicate improvement on a 1-7s scale with 1 as "much worse" to "much better" scale. For PGIC (ordinal) data repored is number of participants with at least moderate improvement (score>=5).
4 months
Mean Pain Satisfaction Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: 4 month
Pain satisfaction will be measured using an adapted Pain Satisfaction Questionnaire. This 5-item measure about patient self report of experience of treatment . The questions are on a scale from (0=very dissatisfied to 4=very satisfied). Total score range 0-4 with higher scores indicating more satisfaction.
4 month
Difference in Treatment Dose
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post baseline
Number of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain sessions or COPES sessions attended for this treatment. Data presented is the number of sessions completed by expected number of sessions, among participants who initiated treatment.
Up to 12 months post baseline
Mean Numeric Rating Score (NRS), Pain Intensity Score
Time Frame: 4 months
Average pain intensity NRS rating (over past week) range is 0-10. Higher scores indicate more pain.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alicia Heapy, Phd, VA Office of Research and Development

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000024225
  • 1UG3AT009767-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 4UH3AT009767-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on COPES

Subscribe