A Multi-site Comparison of Social Visual Engagement to Clinical Diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorder

November 7, 2023 updated by: EarliTec Diagnostics, Inc

Prospective, Pivotal, Double-Blinded Within-subject Comparison of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and Current Best Practice Clinical Diagnosis For Autism Spectrum Disorder in Pediatric Subjects 16-30 Months of Age

This is an outpatient, multicenter, prospective, pivotal, double-blind, within-subject comparison trial of the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device (MAC-ID) diagnostic procedure relative to the gold-standard (reference standard), current best practice expert clinician diagnosis (ECD) of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children 16-30 months of age.

Consecutive pediatric patients from the intended population (i.e. children 16-30 months of age) recruited from pediatric referrals and general advertisements will be the subjects of this trial. All subjects will undergo the MAC-ID diagnostic procedure (test). All subjects will also undergo the current best practice clinical diagnostic procedure, using standardized ASD diagnostic instruments and standardized developmental assessments, to produce the ECD of each child's ASD status (reference/gold standard).

The study consists of a screening phase and diagnostic evaluation phase to assess the validity (sensitivity and specificity), safety, and effectiveness of the MAC-ID when used to diagnose ASD.

Subjects will be enrolled in the trial for a period of 1 day. The trial will be completed in approximately 12 months.

The overall study objective is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MAC-ID to accurately diagnose ASD (primary analysis), as well as to accurately assess severity of ASD (secondary analysis) in very young pediatric subjects.

The primary endpoints of this study are the diagnostic result from the MAC-ID and the diagnostic results from the ECD evaluation, both of which are either positive or negative for ASD. Each subject will undergo the Social Developmental Testing Device procedure and an examination by a clinical expert in the field of ASD diagnosis; all study center site personnel (including the expert clinicians responsible for the ECD evaluation) will be blinded to MAC-ID results.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

505

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California San Francisco
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Emory University
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects will be recruited on the basis of concern for ASD, including children who a parent, caregiver, or clinician suspects may have ASD as well as children who are not suspected to have an ASD.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study:

  1. Boys and girls between 16 and 30 months of age
  2. Generally healthy with no acute illnesses by physical examination
  3. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision, in terms of visual acuity and oculomotor function, sufficient to watch short videos. Adequate hearing to hear material presented in videos
  4. Subject and parent can communicate meaningfully in English with the principal investigator and the clinical study site staff
  5. Subject's parent or guardian is able to read and understand the informed consent form
  6. Parent voluntarily provides written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Any subject who meets any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  1. Known genetic disorders (e.g., Fragile X, Williams Syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Neurofibromatosis, Down Syndrome)
  2. Severe hearing or visual impairment as determined on physical examination (e.g., congenital nystagmus, congenital cataracts, previous diagnosis of severe hearing deficits by otoacoustic emissions or auditory brainstem response)
  3. Acute illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection, i.e., conjunctivitis, fever, uncontrolled allergy symptoms, etc.
  4. Uncontrolled epilepsy or seizure disorder
  5. History or presence of a clinically significant medical disease, or a mental state that might confound the study or be detrimental to the subject as determined by the investigator
  6. Acute exacerbations of chronic illnesses likely to prevent successful or valid data collection
  7. Receiving therapies that may affect vision, i.e., currently receiving or have received the following therapies within 2 weeks of screening: topiramate, chlorpromazine, thioridazine, prednisone, prednisolone (including ophthalmic solutions and ointments), diphenhydramine, or hydroxyzine; or have received ophthalmic antibiotics within 3 days of screening: tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin solutions and/or bacitracin ointment
  8. Receiving therapies that may affect the ability to focus attention on the videos, i.e., if on central nervous system (CNS) stimulants, CNS depressants, or anticonvulsants, dose must be stable (same dose for at least 2 weeks).
  9. Known allergies or sensitivity to the plastic, leather, or metal components used in the materials of the Social Developmental Testing Device seat
  10. Unable or unwilling to sit in a car seat, e.g., child has tantrums on nearly all occasions when placed in a car seat and tantrums do not subside within 5 minutes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Children who meet criteria based on expert clinical diagnosis for autism spectrum disorder will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment.
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.
Non-autism Spectrum Disorder
Children who do not meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder based on expert clinical diagnosis will be tested with the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device and expert clinical assessment.
This trial will ascertain whether the binary results of autism or not-autism as determined by the Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device match expert clinical diagnostic opinion. The investigational device is designed to measure visual attention to social information in the environment relative to normative, age-specific benchmarks; these measurements assess presence (primary efficacy outcome) and severity (secondary outcomes) of autism spectrum disorder in 16- to 30-month-old children.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Time Frame: 1 day
In a sample of 400, 200 ASD and 200 non-ASD, the investigational device binary determination of ASD versus non-ASD will match the clinician best estimate diagnosis with 70/70 sensitivity and specificity
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social disability index
Time Frame: 1 day
Using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition, does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the severity of autism symptomatology
1 day
Verbal Ability Index
Time Frame: 1 day
Using the verbal domains of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, does the degree of does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the level of verbal abilities
1 day
Nonverbal Ability Index
Time Frame: 1 day
Using the nonverbal domain of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, does the degree of does the degree of deviation of visual engagement indicate the level of nonverbal abilities
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cheryl Klaiman, PhD, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Marcus Autism Center Investigational Device

3
Subscribe