Improving Planned Surgical Case Duration Accuracy by Leveraging the EHR and Predictive Modeling

March 16, 2022 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Improving Planned Surgical Case Duration Accuracy by Leveraging the EHR and Predictive Modeling - A Randomized Control Trial

The investigators are studying the duration it takes surgeons to complete their respective surgical cases. The hospital hopes to improve the overall operating room scheduling accuracy from this project.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

683

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memoral Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Surgeons and OR staff from the GYN and CRS services

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A surgeon or OR staff member in the Department of Surgery Gynecology and Colorectal service

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any new surgeon that starts their practice during the study
  • Surgery will take place at a location other than the Main hospital or Josie Robertson Surgical Center
  • Cases where input data was not available prior to the prediction generation including late add-on cases such as urgent and emergent cases that are placed on the schedule less than 24 hours before the surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
standard scheduling process
Scheduling office assigns start time and room for case and places case on schedule. At this point a default case duration is evaluated by the scheduling office, to see if the value is considered excessively short or excessively long.
Scheduling office assigns start time and room for case and places case on schedule. At this point a default case duration is evaluated by the scheduling office, to see if the value is considered excessively short or excessively long. Depending on the assessment, the scheduling office will either keep the default value, use the value that the surgeon placed in the notes (if available), or the scheduling office provides their own estimation.
assigned a planned case duration value from predictive model
Predictive model calculates new duration for case at 3AM the day before surgery, and the predictions are made available on a SecureShare-site.

Predictive model calculates new duration for case at 3AM the day before surgery, and the predictions are made available on a SecureShare-site.

Model predictions are then read by scheduling manager sometime between 7am-10am from the SecureShare site, and the scheduling manager will in EPIC/OpTime, overwrite the current estimate with the new duration value that was generated by the predictive model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration it takes surgeons to complete their respective surgical cases
Time Frame: 1 year
All Gynecology (GYN) and Colorectal (CRS) Surgeons at MSKCC will be included. To test the hypothesis that the developed surgical case duration prediction model compared to the current process of estimating surgical case durations, will show improved prediction accuracy, measured by mean absolute error.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Stromblad, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-115

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Operative Time

Clinical Trials on standard scheduling process

Subscribe