The Effectiveness of Cancer Pain Management in Siriraj Outpatient Pain Clinic

February 22, 2021 updated by: Mahidol University

The Effectiveness of Cancer Pain Management Including Early Pain Intervention, Early Multi Modality Treatment and Closed Follow up in Siriraj Outpatient Pain Clinic

-Background: Cancer is one of the most common cause of death. Cancer pain is often cited as one of the most feared in cancer patients. Although, WHO guidelines have been provided to improve pain outcome, the results are still unsatisfied. In order to improve cancer pain management we consider to contribute a new guideline which includes interdisciplinary approach, early doing the pain interventions, breakthrough pain, education, high quality of pain assessment and contribute the effectiveness follow-up system

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  • Objectives:Primary outcome is study the effectiveness of new approach and closed follow up system by relief pain intensity 30% at 3 month up to 80% of all new cancer pain patients in OPD setting Secondary outcomes are quality of life (BPI,ESAS), side effect of treatments and the contributing factors that impact on the outcomes
  • Study design:A prospective observational study
  • Sample size : 150
  • Data collection: General information: age, gender, body weight, height, religion, residence, care giver, occupation, income, education, medical problem Clinical pain information: primary diagnosis, staging, cancer site, current medications Clinical assessment: at three study time points: baseline (initial assessment) and the three subsequent follow-ups (FU1, FU2 and FU3)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Faculty of medicine Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The new patients with cancer pain in Siriraj outpatients pain clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer pain patients
  • more than 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical instability
  • Cannot read and write
  • Do not know the diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of Pain.
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale Total score 0-10 (0 is best outcome, 10 is worst outcome) 0-3 is mild pain, 4-7 is moderate pain, 7-10 is severe pain.
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline

To assess the severity of pain and impact on functioning that included worst pain in last 24 hrs, least pain in last 24 hrs, pain average, pain right now, general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationship with other, sleep and enjoyment of life.

Each symptoms scales 0-10 (0 mean no symptom, not interfere, 10 mean most symptom, most interfere) total 70 scores

Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
Edmonton Symptom Assessment System(ESAS)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
To assess multi-directional of patients quality of life, included 9 symptoms ( pain,tired, neausea, depress, anxious, drowsiness, appetite, feeling of well being, shortness of breath) Each symptoms scales 0-9 (0 mean no Symptom, 9 mean most severe symptom) total ESAS 90 scores
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
Percentage of Moderate to Severe Sedation
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline.

Pasero Opioid-induced Sedation Scale (POSS)

  • S=sleep, easy to arouse
  • 1=awake/alert
  • 2= slight drowsy/easy aroused
  • 3=Frequently drowsy, arousable, drifts off to sleep during conversation
  • 4=Somnolent, minimal or no response to verbal and physical stimulation Score of 2-4 indicated moderate to severe sedation
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline.
Percentage of Moderate to Severe Neausea and Vomitting
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline

Four points scale to evaluate opioid induce nausea and vomiting Total scales 0-3 (0 is best outcome, 3 is worst outcome)

  • 0= no nausea and vomiting
  • 1= mild symptom but not need any treatments. (only neausea)
  • 2= moderate symptom, need treatment, can control symptom. (have vomiting can control with medication)
  • 3= severe symptom, need treatment, cannot control symptom. (vomiting can not control with medication)
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
Percentage of Moderate to Severe Constipation
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline

Stool free interval 72 (sfi72) to evaluate opioid induce costipation (OIC): 0-4.

Total scale 0-4 (0 is best outcome, 4 is worst outcome)

  • 0 represented one defecation within the previous 72 hr
  • 1 denoted mild constipation (no defecation within the last 72 h)
  • 2 referred to the use of a maximum of 3 laxatives
  • 3 referred to the use of more than 3 laxatives
  • 4 referred to the use of all laxatives have failed Score of 2-4 indicated moderate to severe constipation
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline
Percentage of Satisfied With the Service (Score=3)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 wks from the baseline.

Satisfied score

  • 1=Dissatisfied
  • 2=Neutral
  • 3=Satisfied
Approximately 12 wks from the baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pain Clinic Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Si 622/2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on follow up system and multimodality approach

Subscribe