Staple vs. Suture in Robotic Prostatectomy

July 26, 2022 updated by: Swedish Medical Center

Endoscopic Stapling Versus Suture Ligation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of three standard of care surgical methods [stapling versus selective suture ligation (cut, then sew) versus single suture ligation (sew, then cut) of the dorsal venous complex (DVC)] during robotic prostate surgery to see which is better for the patient's recovery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The dorsal venous complex (DVC) lies on top of the prostate gland, and carries blood away from the penis. It has to be tied off, or ligated, to remove the prostate gland. The DVC lies very close to nerves that help men get and maintain erections. In addition, the DVC is close to muscles that control passing urine. How the DVC is handled during prostate surgery may result in cancer being left behind to grow and spread in the body. The purpose of this study is to compare the results of stapling versus selective suture ligation (cut, then sew) versus single suture ligation (sew, then cut) of the DVC during robotic prostate surgery to see which is better for the patient's recovery.

This research is being done because doctors do not know which of these three commonly-used methods is better to reduce blood loss and reduce the chance of cancer left behind during surgery, and regain urine control and improve erectile function after surgery. Doctors also do not know if these methods affect the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in the blood after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males over 18 years of age
  • Must be scheduled to undergo standard of care robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP)
  • Must sign informed consent to be randomized between the three surgical arms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is unwilling or unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Staple Ligation
Arm 1: Staple Ligation
Using a stapler that staples the DVC and then cuts it.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Selective Suture Ligation
Arm 2: Selective Suture Ligation
Suture the DVC, suspend it to the pubic bone, and then cut.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Single Suture Ligation
Arm 3: Single Suture Ligation
Cut the DVC, then pinpoint a specific blood vessel needed to sew/suture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Continence Rates
Time Frame: 2 years
The amount of time after surgery for a patient to regain continence (is no longer using pads).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Erectile Function
Time Frame: 2 years
The amount of time after surgery for a patient to regain erectile function.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PID 211077

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Staple Ligation

Subscribe