Effects of a PF Ophthalmic Solution Containing HA0.4% and TAU 0.5%

March 27, 2018 updated by: Fondazione G.B. Bietti, IRCCS

Exploring the Effects of a Preservative-free Ophthalmic Solution Containing Hyaluronic Acid 0.4% and Taurine 0.5% on the Ocular Surface of Glaucoma Patients Under Multiple Long-term Topical Hypotensive Therapy

Eligible patients underwent evaluation of ocular surface parameters by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) questionnaires, Break Up Time test (BUT), Schirmer I test, corneal and conjunctival staining (Oxford scale) and conjunctival in vivo confocal microscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, Heidelberg Engineering Gmbh, Heidelberg, Germany). After the baseline visit, patients were randomized to use a PF ophthalmic solution containing HA 0.4% and TAU 0.5%, QID, in both eyes (Group 1) or to use a PF ophthalmic solution containing HA 0.2%, QID, (Group 2) in addition to the ongoing preserved hypotensive treatment. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30 and 90 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At the screening visit all patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examination including best corrected visual acuity assessment, slit lamp evaluation, IOP measurement using Goldmann applanation tonometry, and indirect dilated ophthalmoscopy with a 90 diopters lens. Visual field testing using Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard program (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA 24-2 program) was performed only for those patients with the last exam older than 3 months.

Baseline visit was splitted in two visits scheduled 1 week apart 2 days, to evaluate ocular surface alterations by means of several tests.

To minimize the influence of each test on the subsequent test, we performed first the least invasive and then the most invasive test. During the first baseline visit patients were asked to fill two questionnaires, the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) and then underwent the Break Up Time test (BUT), corneal and conjunctival staining evaluation using Oxford Staining Scheme, and Schirmer I test after 15 minutes of rest. During the second baseline visit, patients underwent conjunctival Confocal Laser Microscopy with the Rostock Module of Cornea of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT3, Heidelberg Engineering Gmbh, Heidelberg, Germany).

At the end of the second baseline visit patients were randomized in two groups with a 1:1 ratio according to a computer-generated randomization list.

Group 1 (HA0.4%+TAU0.5%) was asked to self-administer 1 drop four times/day of a preservative-free ophthalmic solution containing 750KDa HA 0.4% and TAU 0.5% in both eyes, while Group 2 (HA0.2%) was asked to self-administer 1 drop four times/day of a preservative-free ophthalmic solution containing only 750KDa HA 0.2%, in addition to the ongoing hypotensive therapy.

Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30 and 90 days and all the exams were repeated in the same order, as they were performed at the baseline visits.

Both eyes were tested but only one randomly selected eye per patient was included in the analysis.

The primary endpoint was the comparison of the changes over time of the CGC density between the two groups. Secondary endpoints were the between groups comparisons of the changes over time of BUT, Schirmer test, conjunctival staining, OSDI score and GSS score.

All clinical measurements as well the statistical analysis were performed by investigators masked for the patients' treatment group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of glaucoma with an ongoing topical therapy with two or more preserved ocular hypotensive eye-drops per day for at least two years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Best corrected visual acuity ≤ 20/40
  • History of active or past ophthalmological diseases different than glaucoma
  • Contraindications to use of topical solution components used in this study
  • Current use of contact lenses
  • Current use or use in the past 6 months of ocular medications other than hypotensive eye-drops
  • Systemic treatments known to affect tear secretion
  • Any history or slit lamp evidence of eye surface diseases different from dry eye
  • History of ocular trauma
  • Surgery or laser treatments
  • Rheumatologic and autoimmune diseases
  • Diabetes
  • Peripheral neuropathies
  • Use of systemic steroids or immunosuppressants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HA0.4%+TAU0.5%
Patients had to administer 4 drops/day of an ophthalmic solution containing hyaluronic acid 0.4% and taurine 0.5% in addition to the ongoing glaucoma treatment
4 drops /day in addition to the ongoing glaucoma treatment
Active Comparator: HA0.2%
Patients took 4 drops/day of an ophthalmic solution containing hyaluronic acid 0.2%
4 drops /day in addition to the ongoing glaucoma treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of conjunctival goblet cells (CGC) density after 30 and 90 days
Time Frame: Baseline, 30 and 60 days
Density of CGC was measured by means of conjunctival confocal microscopy
Baseline, 30 and 60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Hyaluronic acid 0.4% and Taurine 0.5%

Subscribe