Traumastem® Versus Surgicel® for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection (TSFHR)

October 22, 2018 updated by: Jialin Zhang, China Medical University, China

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Traumastem® Versus Surgicel® for the Secondary Treatment of Local Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection

Topical hemostats are agents that stop bleeding by contributing blood to clot. Oxidized cellulose, a sort of mechanical hemostatic material, predominantly forms a block to stop the blood flow and provides a surface to clot more rapidly.It was marketed for the first time in 1945 and widely used for its convenience, biocompatibility, and bactericide from that time. It is currently available in many commercial products, while manufactured using either a regenerated or nonregenerated process. The physicochemical property and hemostatic efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORCG) and oxidized nonregenerated cellulose (ONRCG) has been well documented using in vitro test and animal models, and ONRCG was seemingly superior to ORCG in terms of hemostasis. However, no clinical study has been performed to verify. Therefore, the objective of this prospective randomized study is to assess the hemostatic efficacy of ORCG (Surgicel®, Ethicon) vs ONRCG (Traumastem®, Bioster) for hemostasis of local bleeding in patients undergoing hepatic resection.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Representative liver resected surface (prominent bleeding site) was applied the ply of gauze with several seconds of even finger gentle press under aseptic conditions, then it was untouched and observed for 10 min. Vascular occlusion of the liver was allowed if necessary, but was open for evaluation of hemostatic efficacy. Hemostatic time began to calculate when gauze was applied. Time to hemostasis was recorded in seconds and the maximum time to hemostasis was 600 seconds. Hemostasis success was achieved based on there was no visible bleeding or minimal ooze from the resection wound.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110001
        • Hepatobiliary Surgery Department of the First Hosptial of China Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatient with informed consent
  • Adults aged between 18 to 75 and do not plan to have child within 1 year after the surgery
  • Resection of at least the equivalent tissue volume of 1 anatomical segment of the liver
  • Minor to moderate (oozing/diffuse) bleeding from the incisal area after conventional resection procedure and primary control of arterial pulsating bleeding or major venous hemorrhage by sutures, ligations, vascular clips, or point electrocautery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for emergency surgery
  • Participate in other clinical trials in the past 3 months
  • Obvious hematologic disorder (as judged by the investigator from anemia and coagulation dysfunction)
  • Patients with brain disease, abnormal judgment or mental disorder that does not cooperate with the researcher
  • Patients with asthma or allergies
  • Patients with severe cardiac disease, metabolic disease or endocrine disorders
  • Immunodeficient patients (AIDS)
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding females
  • Skin infection in the field of the targeted incisional area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traumastem®
Oxidized nonregenerated cellulose hemostatic agents.Traumastem® absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding.The patches are used on the wound surface of the liver.
Intraoperative application as secondary hemostatic treatment
Active Comparator: Surgicel®
Oxidized regenerated cellulose hemostatic agents.Surgicle® absorbable patches, applied topically, once, intraoperatively to stop bleeding.The patches are used on the wound surface of the liver.
Intraoperative application as secondary hemostatic treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemostatic time
Time Frame: 10 minutes
Hemostatic time began to calculate when gauze was applied.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative drainage volume
Time Frame: In the first day after surgery
Drainage volume through the site
In the first day after surgery
Postoperative drainage time
Time Frame: Up time to removal of wound drain, an expected average of 1 week
The duration of drainage
Up time to removal of wound drain, an expected average of 1 week
Hospital stay
Time Frame: Up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 3 weeks
Total hospital stay
Up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 3 weeks
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks
Total postoperative hospital stay
Up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jialin Zhang, Ph.D/MD, First Hospital of China Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 21, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Absorbable hemostatic gauze

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Surgicel®

Subscribe