Use of an Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose After Hepatic Surgery

September 19, 2011 updated by: Jia Fan, Fudan University

The Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgicel® Absorbable Haemostat Covering the Raw Cut Surface During the Hepatectomy

Hepatectomy is one of the best treatments for malignant or benign lesions of the liver. The mortality and morbidity rates after hepatectomy have declined in recent years because of the precise measurement of liver functional reserve, a better understanding of liver anatomy, meticulous haemostasis during operation and improved postoperative management. Although surgical techniques have improved, life-threatening complications, such as intra-abdominal bleeding, bile leakage and subphrenic infection, now cannot be completed avoided. The local complications were most associated with the liver section treatment during the operation. Hence, the need for safer and more effective hemostatic treatment than the conventional approaches, such as intraoperative pressure by surgical gauze, ligatures, and electrocoagulation by mono- or bipolar instruments.

Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat is a sterile absorbable knitted fabric prepared by the controlled oxidation of regenerated cellulose. After Surgicel® has been saturated with blood, it swells into a brownish or black gelatinous mass which aids in the formation of a clot, thereby serving as a haemostatic adjunct in the control of local haemorrhage barriers on section.

The present randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat covering the raw cut surface during the hepatectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center investigation with a minimum of forty (40) controlled study subjects designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat as an absorbable hemostat in the hepatic surgical patient population.

Subjects who are undergoing hepatic surgical procedures should be considered for this investigation. The raw cut surface was covered with Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat or none but was dried by using fine sutures and an argon beam to achieve complete haemostasis. Subjects can be pre-screened utilizing standard of care data for the specified inclusion/exclusion criteria to ensure that they are eligible for treatment in the investigation. If the subject appears to qualify for the investigation, the subject will then be asked to give his/her written informed consent. All subjects will be followed through their hospitalization. Follow-up evaluations will include time to removal of wound drain, the amount of effusion, length of postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative morbidity.

From baseline to the final study exam, data pertaining to the investigational objectives will be recorded on the appropriate case report forms at the predetermined study intervals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is 18 years to 70 Years
  2. The subject is undergoing major hepatectomy (right hemihepatectomy, right posterior sectionectomy, and right anterior sectionectomy) without concomitant operation on another organ or anastomosis between bile ducts, or bile ducts and the digestive tract, and no abdominal infection
  3. The subject is willing and able to provide appropriate informed consent
  4. The subject is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol, including the predefined follow-up evaluations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is known or suspected to be pregnant (verified in a manner consistent with institution's standard of care), or is lactating
  2. The subject has an active infection at the surgical site
  3. The use of hemostatic agents are contraindicated for the subject
  4. The subject has a known bleeding disorder (including thrombocytopenia [< 100,000 platelet count], thromboasthenia, hemophilia, or von Willebrand disease)
  5. The subject has had surgery at the intended application site ≤ 6 months before the current surgical procedure
  6. The subject is unavailable for follow-up
  7. The subject is currently participating in another investigational device or drug trial
  8. Administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or anti-platelet agents within 1 week before surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat
The raw cut surface was covered with Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat or none but was dried by using fine sutures and an argon beam to achieve complete haemostasis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the size of any subphrenic collection or pleural effusion
Time Frame: up time to the drainage tube removed, an expected average of 1 week
If large amounts of ascites developed, diuretics were given and the volume of infusion was limited. Before removed grainage tube, all patients were examined by ultrasonography performed by a doctor without knowledge of the study. The size of any subphrenic collection or pleural effusion was recorded. The drainage tube was removed when the leakage per 24 h was less than 50 cm3, the appearance of the secretion had changed from hematic to serous, and no bilious or infectious discharge was present, as determined by observation.
up time to the drainage tube removed, an expected average of 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to removal of wound drain
Time Frame: up time to removal of wound drain, an expected average of 1 week
up time to removal of wound drain, an expected average of 1 week
length of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks
up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks
incidence of postoperative morbidity
Time Frame: up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks
After surgery, albumin, prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics, and enriched branched amino acid and fat emulsion (medium- and long-chain triglycerides), were given for 5-7 days until oral intake was possible.Ultrasonography-guided paracentesis or insertion of a second drainage tube was performed in patients with a subphrenic collection accompanied by fever (38.5◦C or higher) or a raised white blood cell count.
up time to discharge from hospital,an expected average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 20, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Surgicel® absorbable Haemostat

3
Subscribe