Spleen Stiffness Combined With Liver Stiffness Measured by 2D-SWE for the Screening of High-risk Varices in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2004)

April 23, 2023 updated by: Xiaolong Qi, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Spleen Stiffness Combined With Liver Stiffness Measured by Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for the Screening of High-risk Varices in Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2004)

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.

Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.

Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Meanwhile, numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on 2D-SWE is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.

Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.

Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study in seven centers including LanZhou University, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region, The Central Hospital of Lishui City and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Sumei Ma, MD
  • Phone Number: +8615009311518 +8615009311518
  • Email: lzmsm6711@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
      • Guangxi, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
        • Contact:
          • Guo Zhang
      • Lanzhou, China
        • Recruiting
        • LanZhou University
        • Contact:
          • Sumei Ma, MD
      • Lishui, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Central Hospital of Lishui City
        • Contact:
          • Chuxiao Shao
      • Shenyang, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
      • Tianjin, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tianjin Second People's Hospital
      • Xi'zang, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with compensated advanced chronic liver disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years;
  • confirmed cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
  • without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
  • scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement;
  • estimated survival time>24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease score<19, and without liver transplant;
  • with written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
  • accepted primary prevention (non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation);
  • time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodenoscopy>14 days;
  • diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma;
  • absence of spleen or splenectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Overall eligible participants
Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography, gallbladder wall thickness, spleen thickness, spleen long diameter and serological examination (platelet count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, creatinine, albumin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio).
Procedure: Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.
Time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodendoscopy is within 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness to avoid unnecessary esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of LSPS model base on two-dimensional shear wave elastography
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of LSPS (liver stiffness-spleen size- to platelet ration risk score) base on two-dimensional shear wave elastography for high-risk varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day
Rate of hemodynamic responder of patients receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy
Time Frame: 1 month
Rate of hemodynamic responder of patients receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy assessed by spleen stiffness
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Collaborators

LanZhou University
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
Tianjin Second People's Hospital
The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Linxue Qian, MD, Beijing Friendship Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Chao Liu, MD, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region
  • Principal Investigator: Sumei Ma, MD, LanZhou University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 7, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 7, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHESS2004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Variceal Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Congo, DR of

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe