CEUS for Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children

December 16, 2025 updated by: Aaron E. Chen, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma Imaging in Children

Children with blunt abdominal trauma often get a CT as the first line imaging to evaluate for intra-abdominal organ injury. CT scans have some downsides with regard to radiation exposure, costs, and need for transport. Contrast enhanced ultrasonography has recently shown some promise as a way to detect intra-abdominal organ injury and may be able to replace the need for conventional CT scanning, without the need for ionizing radiation and the ability to be performed at the bedside.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In children with abdominal trauma, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen is considered the gold standard for the initial evaluation of solid organ injuries. The major drawbacks to CT include risks due to radiation exposure and necessity of transport of the patient. Ultrasound without contrast uses safer non-ionizing radiation and can be performed at the bedside, however it has been shown to have variable sensitivity and specificity for identifying intra-abdominal organ injury. Newer studies using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) have shown promise for improving the sensitivity and specificity of this imaging modality.

Hypothesis(es) and Aims:

Hypothesis: Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has good sensitivity and specificity as compared to a gold standard conventional CT scan for the identification of intra-abdominal solid organ injury in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma. Specific Aims:

Primary Aim: To determine the test characteristics CEUS / conventional ultrasound for the detection of intra-abdominal solid organ injury, as compared to a gold standard CT scan, in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal trauma

Design:

This will be a prospective cohort study to evaluate the test characteristics of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the detection of intra-abdominal solid organ injury in children with blunt abdominal trauma, as compared to a gold standard CT scan. Study subjects will be age 0-18 years, presenting with hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma and for whom an abdominal CT scan is planned. The exclusion criteria will be a known allergy to the ultrasound contrast agent, co-existing penetrating abdominal trauma, or known congenital or acquired heart disease. Sample size calculations assume a baseline prevalence of disease in approximately 20% of patients receiving a CT scan, and target a sensitivity of at least 95% with a two-sided confidence interval precision of 8%, yielding an estimated sample size of 146 patients. The primary outcome will be calculation of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS as compared to a gold standard CT scan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

146

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55902
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • Recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tobias Kummer, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemodynamically stable (defined as not needing massive transfusion protocol and not undergoing an emergent surgical procedure within the next hour)
  2. History of or suspicion for blunt abdominal trauma
  3. Abdominal CT ordered or obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of allergic reaction to Lumason, sulfur hexaflouride, sulfur hexafluoride lipid microsphere components, or other ingredients in Lumason (polyethylene glycol, distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC), dipalmitoylphosphatidylglycerol sodium (DPPG-Na), palmitic acid)
  2. Co-existing penetrating abdominal trauma
  3. Known congenital or acquired heart disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound arm
contrast-enhanced ultrasound
injection of Lumason (ultrasound contrast agent)
Other Names:
  • Lumason
ultrasound of the abdomen after injection of ultrasound contrast agent (Lumason)
Other Names:
  • ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of CEUS
Time Frame: through study completion, which is expected to take around 3 years
calculation of sensitivity of CEUS for organ injury, as compared to gold standard CT
through study completion, which is expected to take around 3 years
Specificity of CEUS
Time Frame: through study completion, which is expected to take around 3 years
calculation of specificity of CEUS for organ injury, as compared to gold standard CT exam
through study completion, which is expected to take around 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron E Chen, MD, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma Abdomen

Clinical Trials on Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid Type A Microspheres 25 MG Intravenous Powder for Suspension [LUMASON]

Subscribe