Lumason® Infusion vs. Bolus Administrations

March 4, 2026 updated by: Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

A Phase III Crossover Study to Evaluate Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion of Lumason® in Patients With Suboptimal Unenhanced Echocardiography

A phase III study designed as a randomized, within-patient comparison of continuous infusion of diluted Lumason® versus the bolus administration of undiluted Lumason® for degree of LVO and assessment of LV EBD (co-primary endpoints).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a phase III study designed as a randomized, within-patient comparison of continuous infusion of diluted Lumason® versus the bolus administration of undiluted Lumason® for degree of LVO and assessment of LV EBD (co-primary endpoints). The study will enroll patients with suboptimal LV EBD defined as ≥2 adjacent segments in any apical view that cannot be visualized at pre-contrast echocardiogram.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • West Hills, California, United States, 91307
        • Recruiting
        • Interventional Cardiology Medical Group
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Farhad Rafii, MD
        • Contact:
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Recruiting
        • Piedmont Heart Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Venkateshwar Polsani, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Oregon Health and Sciences University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David German, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Brian Davidson, MD
    • Texas
      • Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555
        • Withdrawn
        • University of Texas Medical Branch
      • Humble, Texas, United States, 77338
        • Recruiting
        • Vital Heart and Vein
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Kee, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Are at least 18-years old;
  • Have suboptimal LV EBD, defined as ≥2 adjacent segments in any apical view that cannot be visualized, at pre-contrast echocardiogram;
  • Provide their written informed consent and are willing to comply with protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has severe congestive heart failure (class IV according to the classification of the New York Heart Association);
  • Patient has uncontrolled angina (i.e., uncontrolled on medication);
  • Patient had a recent myocardial infarction (within the last 3 days and not stabilized);
  • Patient has severe arrhythmia, that in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the study conduct;
  • Patient has severe pulmonary hypertension, that in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the study conduct;
  • Patient had been treated with any other contrast medium, either intravascular or orally, within 48 hours prior to the first administration;
  • Has any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients of the investigational product;
  • Is pregnant or lactating. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy by: testing on site (serum or urine βHCG) prior to the start of investigational product administration; surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy); post-menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
  • Has previously entered the study or have received any other investigational drug within 30 days prior to admission in this study;
  • Is determined by the Investigator that the patient is clinically unsuitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bolus administration
Bolus administration of 2 mL undiluted Lumason®
Bolus administration of 2 mL undiluted Lumason®, to be administered in 20 seconds
Other Names:
  • Bolus Administration
Experimental: Continuous infusion
Continuous infusion of 8 mL of diluted Lumason®
Continuous infusion of 8 mL of diluted Lumason® (4 mL of Lumason® diluted in 4 mL of saline) at a rate of 1.0 mL/min
Other Names:
  • Infusion Administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequate LV EBD Score
Time Frame: 2-3 Hours
Compare the proportion of patients with adequate LV EBD score for infusion vs. bolus administrations in patients with suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation at unenhanced echocardiography.
2-3 Hours
Adequate LV Opacification
Time Frame: 2-3 Hours
Compare the proportion of patients with adequate LV opacification for infusion vs. bolus administrations in patients with suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation at unenhanced echocardiography.
2-3 Hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically useful LVO
Time Frame: 2-3 Hours
To compare the duration of clinically useful LVO in infusion vs. bolus administrations in terms of duration
2-3 Hours
Adverse events
Time Frame: 24 Hours
Compare adverse event rate after infusion vs. bolus administrations
24 Hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jose Banchs, MD, Sr. Medical Director

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases

Clinical Trials on Sulfur Hexafluoride Lipid Type A Microspheres 25 MG Injection Powder for Suspension [LUMASON]

Subscribe