- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06182488
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy (ERAS)
Safety and Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: A Single Center Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the safety and effectiveness of the ERAS protocols compared to a conventional care protocols in patients who received emergency laparotomy. The main question it aims to answer are:
• Can the ERAS protocols be used safely and effectively in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy? Participants will be randomised into the ERAS group and the conventional group and will be given the ERAS protocols and the conventional protocols in the perioperative period.
Researchers will compare the ERAS group with the conventional group to see if the ERAS programme is effective.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Since Kehlet first proposed enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in the 1990s, researchers have been widely adopted. Preoperative counseling, standardized anesthesia management protocols, more optimal postoperative analgesic regimens, restriction of intubation and catheterization, early postoperative mobilization, and early oral intake of food are all part of ERAS programs. These programs began in colorectal surgery and have now been expanded to other surgical specialties. Several studies have shown that patients benefit from ERAS programs, including reduced pain, faster return to bowel function, shorter hospital stays, and lower health care costs. However, investigators found that ERAS programs are rarely used for emergency surgery.
Emergency surgery is the treatment of choice for acute abdominal conditions such as traumatic liver rupture, traumatic splenic rupture, and complete bowel obstruction. Nevertheless, investigators found that most clinical studies of ERAS excluded patients who underwent emergency surgery. This is because most researchers probably believe that emergency surgery does not allow enough time for ERAS-related preoperative preparation. In fact, some ERAS programs can be used for emergency surgery, such as the anesthetic modality of combined anesthesia, postoperative multimodal analgesia, earlier postoperative oral feeding and ambulation, and earlier removal of invasive catheters. However, few studies have focused on the use of ERAS in emergency surgery.
The present study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of an ERAS program in emergency abdominal surgery. Investigators hypothesized that an ERAS program could be implemented into emergency surgery and reduce postoperative recovery time without increasing the complication rate and readmission rate (<30 days).
The standard operating procedures for the study are as follows:
- Participants will be randomised into the ERAS group and the conventional group.
- Preoperative care: A number of preoperative protocols were similar in both groups, including (1) surgical risk assessment; (2) preoperative placement of a nasogastric tube (NG); (3) preoperative administration of crystalloid fluids to replenish blood volume; (4) empiric antibiotics and acid-reducing therapy administered intravenously; and (5) intravenous analgesia.
In the ERAS group, an epidural catheter was placed in the lumbar 3-4 space before surgery to facilitate intraoperative epidural anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. At the same time, ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation was performed to monitor central venous pressure (CVP). CVP-guided infusion, i.e., goal-directed fluid therapy, was maintained at a CVP of 8-10 cm of saline. Depending on the urinary output, blood pressure, heart rate, and clinical signs of dehydration, fluids were administered according to an institutional care plan in the routine care group. Dexamethasone 4 mg IV was given shortly before induction of anaesthesia.
- Intraoperative care: All patients underwent emergency open surgery. Appropriate surgical incisions were selected based on adequate provision of good surgical vision and surgical space. If intra-abdominal fluid was found, it was aspirated and sent for bacterial culture. The final decision on the surgical approach is based on the surgeon's opinion and intraoperative findings. If anastomosis was deemed unsafe, an ileostomy without anastomosis was performed. Table 1 shows the changes in the anaesthesia regimen in the ERAS group. The anesthesiologist decided on the anaesthesia for the conventional group. In the ERAS group, an experienced surgeon set up an abdominal drain as needed during the procedure. In the conventional care group, an abdominal drain was routinely placed.
- Postoperative care: Patients in the ERAS group were asked to start simple bed activities, such as moving both lower limbs, on the day of surgery (POD-0), provided that the epidural catheter was secure. At POD-1, patients were asked to sit for at least 2 hours and then get out of bed after the epidural catheter was removed at POD-2. In the conventional group, patients were encouraged to be active at POD-2, starting with simple bed activities and gradually transitioning to normal walking without any specific requirements.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jianing Lu, MD
- Phone Number: 86-022-60910136
- Email: lujianing2006@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hong Zheng, MD
- Email: zhenghongyx@139.com
Study Locations
-
-
Tianjin
-
Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300000
- Recruiting
- Tianjin Hospital
-
Contact:
- Bin Dai
- Phone Number: +86 138 2166 0137
- Email: 490621209@qq.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Yan Zhuang, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients between the ages 18-70,
- Patients who completed the preoperative examination and preoperative diagnosis within 4 hours after admission for acute abdomen diseases,
- Required emergency surgery within 6 hours from surgeon encounter.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who refused to be enrolled in this study;
- Patients with any psychiatric or neurological disorders;
- Pseptic shock at admission;
- Duration of symptoms more than five days;
- Patients with contraindications to the placement of lumbar epidural catheters, such as coagulation disorders, severe sepsis, etc.;
- Presence of preoperative factors affecting wound healing (e.g. long-term steroid use);
- Patients with extra-abdominal injuries or terminal malignancy, or patients requiring damage control surgery;
- Patients found intraoperatively to require any procedure other than splenectomy, partial hepatectomy or liver repair, bowel resection and anastomosis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy, and gastrointestinal perforation repair.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: ERAS Group
According to the ERAS guidelines, the ERAS group received ERAS protocol.
|
ERAS protocols for emergency abdominal surgery
|
Other: Conventional group
Conventional perioperative interventions
|
Conventional protocols for emergency abdominal surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
postoperative recovery time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
Postoperative recovery time that meets the relevant definitions in this study
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
the rate of postoperative complications
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
Percentage of participants who met the recovery condition after surgery as a percentage of total participants
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time of first postoperative flatus
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time of first postoperative flatus
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time to tolerate semi-fluid diet after surgery
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time to tolerate semi-fluid diet after surgery
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time to tolerate soft food after surgery
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The time to tolerate soft food after surgery
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
The rate of readmission (in 30 days)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
Percentage of participants who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days after surgery for an adverse event related to this procedure as a percentage of total participants
|
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Hong Zheng, MD, Tianjin First Central Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-YLS-010 (Other Identifier: Tianjin Hospital)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Abdomen
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedNon Enhanced MSCT Abdomen in Diagnosis of Acute AbdomenEgypt
-
Amal Fathy Abo ElgaradUnknown
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownUltra Sound in Diagnosis of Acute Abdomen in Pediatric Group
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownPatient Presented With Acute Abdomen | Patient Undergoing Urgent GIT Surgery
-
Pitié-Salpêtrière HospitalAssociation pour la Recherche et la Formation en Anesthésie Analgésie RéanimationCompleted
-
Zealand University HospitalWithdrawnAcute AbdomenDenmark
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ModenaCompleted
-
Michigan State UniversityCompleted
-
Kuopio University HospitalCompleted
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmCompleted
Clinical Trials on ERAS protocols
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | ERASChina
-
Ataturk UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownPatient Presented With Acute Abdomen | Patient Undergoing Urgent GIT Surgery
-
Erasca, Inc.Active, not recruitingAdvanced or Metastatic Solid TumorsUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...Enrolling by invitation
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedHealthy VolunteerFrance
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Not yet recruiting
-
RTI InternationalPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of California Integrated...CompletedSubstance Use DisordersUnited States
-
University of BirminghamCompletedApical PeriodontitisUnited Kingdom