HIV Treatment Retention Interventions for Women Living With HIV (Siyaphambili Study)

An Adaptive Randomized Evaluation of Nurse-Led HIV Treatment Retention Interventions for Women Living With HIV in Durban, South Africa

The Siyaphambili Study is a sequential multistage adaptive randomized trial (SMART) to compare the effectiveness and durability of two behavioral interventions on the HIV-1 virologic response among female sex workers (FSW) living with HIV in Durban, South Africa. The interventions are: 1) nurse-led decentralized treatment program (DTP) and 2) individualized case management (ICM). Viral suppression is defined as a viral load assessment <50 RNA copies/mL. The design will also estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of study interventions and combinations of interventions compared with maintaining the South African standard of HIV care and treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

RATIONALE: Approximately 60% of the estimated 121,000 - 167,000 female sex workers (FSW) in South Africa are living with HIV. Research suggests only 39% of these women are currently on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and face individual, network and structural level barriers to ART initiation, retention and adherence. To prevent clinical treatment outcome disparities and reduce onward HIV transmission, understanding how best to adapt and implement, scalable and effective interventions to promote viral suppression among marginalized women is paramount. The overall goal of the Siyaphambili study is to inform South African HIV service delivery and scale up determining the most cost-effective package needed to achieve viral suppression among FSW and by characterizing the FSW most in need of these intensive HIV treatment interventions.

HYPOTHESIS: DTP and ICM will be equally effective at achieving viral suppression and will have a synergistic effect when combined and targeted at those who remain non-responsive to either isolated intervention. Additionally, an adaptive, graduated multicomponent intervention to achieve viral suppression would be preferred under standard thresholds for cost-effectiveness over single-intensity interventions or intensive multicomponent interventions for all FSW.

INTERVENTION: The Siyaphambili Study is a sequential multistage adaptive randomized trial (SMART) to compare the effectiveness and durability of two behavioral interventions on the HIV-1 virologic response among FSW living with HIV in Durban, South Africa. The interventions are: 1) nurse-led decentralized treatment program (DTP) and 2) individualized case management (ICM). The design will also estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of study interventions and combinations of interventions compared with maintaining the South African standard of HIV care and treatment.

STUDY DESIGN: A sequential multistage adaptive randomized study, embedded within the TB/HIV Care program in Durban, South Africa, will enroll 800 viremic FSW into the 18-month trial. Women will be randomized to either DTP or ICM at enrolment and rerandomized 6 months after enrolment based on their response to the initial intervention.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and durability of nurse-led DTP and ICM in isolation or in combination to achieve viral suppression.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incremental impact and cost-effectiveness associated with study interventions and combination of interventions.

OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the study is retention and viral suppression among those initially randomized to the DTP verse ICM intervention. The secondary outcomes are retention and viral suppression of non-responders, retention and viral suppression among month 6 non-responders, retention and viral suppression at 18 months among month 6 non-responders randomized to continuation of either intervention verse combined DTP+ICM, risk stratification tool, durability of retention and viral suppression of responders, to assess adherence, to assess viral suppression of retained, loss-to-follow-up, intervention acceptability, switching to 2nd/3rd line ART, and ART resistance.

ANALYTIC PLAN:

Primary analysis for primary outcome:

Retention in ART care and viral suppression will be a combined outcome in an intention to treat (ITT) analysis at 18 months to compare participants initially randomized to the DTP verse ICM intervention. Viral suppression is defined as a viral load assessment <50 RNA copies/mL and participants lost to follow up or who experience death during the trial duration will be grouped with non-virally suppressed participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1391

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sells sex for goods or money as their main source of income
  2. Assigned female sex at birth
  3. ≥ 18 years of age
  4. Living with HIV; diagnosed ≥ 6 months prior
  5. Currently living in Durban
  6. If on ART, initiated ≥2 months prior

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Engagement in an ongoing HIV treatment research study
  2. Planning on leaving Durban for more than 3 months in the following 12 months
  3. Pregnant at time of enrollment
  4. On a second line or third ART regimen
  5. Participating in an adherence club

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DTP, Continue DTP if Responsive

DTP:

  • Standard of care (SoC), minus clinic referrals for antiretroviral therapy (ART) treatment initiation and management.
  • Nurse initiated and managed ART within the community on mobile van at sites served by the mobile van which already provides SoC services

Continues with DTP intervention if virally suppressed at 6 months.

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.
Active Comparator: DTP, Standard of Care (SoC) if Responsive

DTP:

  • Standard of care, minus clinic referrals for ART treatment initiation and management.
  • Nurse initiated and managed ART within the community on mobile van at sites served by the mobile van which already provides SoC services

SoC:

  • HIV counseling and testing (HTC)
  • Sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and treatment
  • Tuberculosis (TB) screening and referral
  • Health education through peer educators and peer supported follow-up related to linkages to care
  • Referrals to Department of Health (DoH) primary healthcare clinics or TB HIV Care (THC) drop-in center for ART treatment initiation and management

Returns to SoC if virally suppressed at 6 months.

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.
Active Comparator: DTP, Continue DTP if Non-Responsive

DTP:

  • Standard of care, minus clinic referrals for ART treatment initiation and management.
  • Nurse initiated and managed ART within the community on mobile van at sites served by the mobile van which already provides SoC services

Continues with DTP intervention if not virally suppressed at 6 months.

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.
Active Comparator: DTP, DTP+ICM if Non-Responsive

DTP:

  • Standard of care, minus clinic referrals for ART treatment initiation and management.
  • Nurse initiated and managed ART within the community on mobile van at sites served by the mobile van which already provides SoC services

ICM:

  • Standard of Care
  • Assignment of peer case manager
  • Face-to-face meeting to tailor ICM approach to FSW preference
  • Self-efficacy building in face-to-face sessions and bi-weekly text messages
  • Relational support through monthly calls, face-to-face meetings every three months, and additional support through female sex worker (FSW) initiated interaction

Receives both interventions at 6 months if non-virally suppressed.

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.
Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.
Active Comparator: ICM, Continue ICM if Responsive

ICM:

  • Standard of Care
  • Assignment of peer case manager
  • Face-to-face meeting to tailor ICM approach to FSW preference
  • Self-efficacy building in face-to-face sessions and bi-weekly text messages
  • Relational support through monthly calls, face-to-face meetings every three months, and additional support through FSW initiated interaction

Continues with ICM intervention at 6 months if virally suppressed.

Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.
Active Comparator: ICM, SoC if Responsive

ICM:

  • Standard of Care
  • Assignment of peer case manager
  • Face-to-face meeting to tailor ICM approach to FSW preference
  • Self-efficacy building in face-to-face sessions and bi-weekly text messages
  • Relational support through monthly calls, face-to-face meetings every three months, and additional support through FSW initiated interaction

SoC:

  • HIV counseling and testing (HTC)
  • STI screening and treatment
  • TB screening and referral
  • Health education through peer educators and peer supported follow-up related to linkages to care
  • Referrals to DOH primary healthcare clinics or THC drop-in center for ART treatment initiation and management

Returns to SoC if virally suppressed at 6 months.

Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.
Active Comparator: ICM, Continue ICM if Non-Responsive

ICM:

  • Standard of Care
  • Assignment of peer case manager
  • Face-to-face meeting to tailor ICM approach to FSW preference
  • Self-efficacy building in face-to-face sessions and bi-weekly text messages
  • Relational support through monthly calls, face-to-face meetings every three months, and additional support through FSW initiated interaction

Continues with ICM intervention at 6 months if non-virally suppressed.

Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.
Active Comparator: ICM, ICM+DTP if Non-Responsive

ICM:

  • Standard of Care
  • Assignment of peer case manager
  • Face-to-face meeting to tailor ICM approach to FSW preference
  • Self-efficacy building in face-to-face sessions and bi-weekly text messages
  • Relational support through monthly calls, face-to-face meetings every three months, and additional support through FSW initiated interaction

DTP:

  • Standard of care, minus clinic referrals for ART treatment initiation and management.
  • Nurse initiated and managed ART within the community on mobile van at sites served by the mobile van which already provides SoC services

Receives both interventions at 6 months if non-virally suppressed.

Provision of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the community through a mobile-van DTP managed by a nurse capable of initiating and managing ART.
Peer-led ICM through quarterly face-to-face meetings, monthly phone calls and biweekly text messages.
No Intervention: Standard of Care (SoC)

Standard of Care (SoC):

  • HIV counseling and testing (HTC)
  • Sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and treatment
  • Tuberculosis (TB) screening and referral
  • Health education through peer educators and peer supported follow-up related to linkages to care
  • Referrals to Department of Health (DoH) primary healthcare clinics or TB HIV Care (THC) drop-in center for ART treatment initiation and management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Retained and Virally Suppressed Among Those Receiving the DTP Versus ICM Arms
Time Frame: 18 months after enrollment
Retention and viral suppression at 18 months in those initially randomized to DTP vs. ICM. Participants are considered to be retained in care if they attended their 18-month final study visit and were engaged in care at 18-months. Viral suppression is defined as having less than 50 viral copies per milliliter.
18 months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention and Viral Suppression of Non-Responders
Time Frame: 18 months after enrollment
Retention and viral suppression at 18 months among month 6 non-responders randomized to continuation of either intervention vs. combined DTP+ICM
18 months after enrollment
Durability of Retention and Viral Suppression of Responders
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Durability of retention and viral suppression among 6 month responders continuing on DTP or ICM vs. those randomized to revert to standard of care (SoC)
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Viral Suppression of Retained
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Among those retained, comparison of viral suppression across arms
Up to 18 months after enrollment
ART Resistance
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Report and compare resistance across arms
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Risk Factors of Loss to Follow-up
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Risk stratification to identify FSW at highest risk for loss to follow-up.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Adherence Assessment
Time Frame: 18 months
Self-reported adherence to assess adherence across arms
18 months
Loss-to-Follow-Up
Time Frame: 18 months after study enrollment
Loss-to-follow-up across arms (DTP vs. ICM). This outcome is presented as an intention to treat analysis based on baseline randomization (DTP vs. ICM). All 777 participants randomized at baseline are included here. Loss to follow-up is defined as having missed the 18-month final study visit.
18 months after study enrollment
Intervention Acceptability
Time Frame: Acceptability of each intervention at 6 month timepoint
Participant reported intervention acceptability
Acceptability of each intervention at 6 month timepoint
2nd/3rd Line ART
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Number of participants who were tested and identified as resistant to first line therapy and were referred to a Department of Health facility for second line therapy across arms
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Intervention
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
This outcome will be estimated using a modeling approach leveraging both the trial data and external evidence synthesis as model inputs. Passive data collection is ongoing and cost-effectiveness results will be reported once available (by March 2024).
Up to 18 months after enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decentralized Treatment Provision (DTP) Pick-Ups
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Number and percentage of DTP pick-ups attended among participants randomized to received DTP.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
ICM Phone-Based Contacts
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Number of ICM phone-based contacts
Up to 18 months after enrollment
ICM In-Person Meetings
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Percentage of face-to-face case manager sessions attended
Up to 18 months after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Baral, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Principal Investigator: Harry Hausler, MD, MPH, TB/HIV Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01NR016650 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1 Virologic Response

Clinical Trials on DTP

3
Subscribe