- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03518905
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Large Symptomatic Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa (RAGE)
February 18, 2020 updated by: Dr. Ivan Kristo, Medical University of Vienna
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Large Symptomatic Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa - a Prospective Randomized Sham-controlled Trial - the RAGE Study
The heterotopic gastric mucosa found in the cervical esophagus was first described in 1805 and affects 10-15% of individuals undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
It leads to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), which causes symptoms like globus sensation, hoarseness and chronic cough.
The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) that ranges from 0-45 measures LPR.
Scores greater than 13 are considered to be pathologic.
Currently, patients that suffer from symptoms of LPR and present with a heterotopic gastric mucosa are routinely offered radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as curative treatment.
Up to now, around 40 patients were already treated at the department of Surgery with 90% histologic eradication rates after 2 treatment sessions and no reported serious adverse event.
Nevertheless, the placebo effect could also be responsible for perception of improving symptoms.
Therefore, this prospective sham-controlled trial was designed to exclude the placebo effect.
As the device is already approved and routinely used for focal ablation safety data are already available.
Up to now, there were no major adverse events, whereas only 10% of patients describe a sensation of irritated throat that dissolves within the first three days after treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Ivan Kristo, MD
- Phone Number: +43140 40056210
- Email: ivan.kristo@meduniwien.ac.at
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sebastian Schoppmann, MD
- Phone Number: +43140 40056210
- Email: sebastian.schoppmann@meduniwien.ac.at
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vienna, Austria, 1090
- Recruiting
- Medical University of Vienna
-
Contact:
- Ivan Kristo, MD
- Phone Number: +434040056210
- Email: ivan.kristo@meduniwien.ac.at
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histological proven presence of heterotopic gastric mucosa,
- pathologic Reflux Symptom Index (>25)
- age: 18-70
- presence of symptoms > 6 months,
- no effect on the Reflux Symptom Index to 12 weeks of standard dose proton pump inhibitor treatment
- negative symptom correlation for symptoms with reflux events in ambulatory pH monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not willing to participate in this study
- pregnancy
- lactation period
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Sham Comparator: sham-treatment
Patients with symptomatic large heterotopic gastric mucosa receive an esophagoscopy without radiofrequency ablation under sedation
|
Patients receive an esophagoscopy without radiofrequency ablation under sedation
|
Active Comparator: treatment arm
Patients with symptomatic large hetertotopic gastric mucosa receive an esophagoscopy with radiofrequency ablation (12J/cm2) using the Barrx channel RFA endoscopic catheter (Medtronic)
|
Radiofrequency ablation is performed using the Barrx Channel endoscopic catheter (Medtronic, Dublin, Republic of Ireland) generating an energy density level of 12 Joule/cm2.
The energy is applied using a simplified protocol of three ablations without removal of coagulated tissue.
The device is used on a routinely basis all around the world and already approved.
The ablation catheter is applied through the working channel of the endoscope.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Normalization of the Reflux Symptom Index
Time Frame: 6 months after first RFA treatment/or sham procedure
|
Normalization of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI <14) after two treatment/sham sessions evaluated 3 months after the second (sham-) treatment (therefore 6 months after the first endoscopy with/without RFA).
Proton-pump inhibitors are paused 8 weeks before assessment
|
6 months after first RFA treatment/or sham procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Histological eradication rate after radiofrequency ablation or sham treatment
Time Frame: 6 months after first RFA treatment/or sham procedure
|
Histologic eradication rate after RFA treatment/sham procedure measured after finalization of RFA (normalization of Reflux Symptom Index/or a maximum of two treatment sessions) or at the time of second sham treatment.
|
6 months after first RFA treatment/or sham procedure
|
SF-12 quality of life
Time Frame: At enrollment (therefore before ablations or sham treatment) and 6 months after first radiofrequency ablation/sham treatment
|
At enrollment (therefore before ablations or sham treatment) and 6 months after first radiofrequency ablation/sham treatment
|
|
Reflux Finding Score
Time Frame: Evaluated at the first intervention at study completion after 6 months
|
the Reflux Finding Score is measured by using laryngofibroscopy to document potential absence of laryngopharyngeal reflux.
The reflux finding score (RFS) represents an objective and validated instrument to analyze physical findings and severity of laryngopharyngeal reflux.
An 8-item checklist with excellent inter-observer reliability grades abnormalities documented during laryngoscopy from 0-26 points.
The total score is reported and summed from an 8 item checklist providing 0-4 points.
Statistically, total scores greater than 7 have a likelihood of 95% to reflect LPR.
Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
|
Evaluated at the first intervention at study completion after 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 16, 2018
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 16, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 16, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 25, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
May 8, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2020
Last Verified
February 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1340/2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Esophagus Disorder
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCCompletedBarrett Esophagus | Gastro-Intestinal DisorderUnited States
-
Hospital del Río HortegaNot yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedEsophagus Disorder | Progenitor Cells | Aging, CellsUnited States
-
Health Science Center of Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityCompletedSquamous Carcinoma of Esophagus | Esophagus DisordersChina
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalNanyang Technological University; Woodlands Health CampusCompletedGastrointestinal Diseases | Esophagus Disorder | Enteral and Supplement Feeds Adverse ReactionSingapore
-
Northwell HealthMayo Clinic; NinePoint MedicalCompletedBarrett's Esophagus Without Dysplasia | Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia | Barrett's Esophagus With Low Grade Dysplasia | Barrett's Esophagus With High Grade Dysplasia | Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia, UnspecifiedUnited States
-
Lucid Diagnostics, Inc.RecruitingBarrett Esophagus | Barretts Esophagus With Dysplasia | Esophagus AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
Professor Michael BourkeWithdrawn
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedBarretts Esophagus With DysplasiaUnited States
-
Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known...Integra LifeSciences CorporationTerminatedBarrett Esophagus | High Grade Dysplasia | EsophagusUnited States
Clinical Trials on esophagoscopy
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); National Institute... and other collaboratorsCompletedEosinophilic EsophagitisUnited States
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompleted
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoCures Within ReachRecruiting
-
University Hospital OstravaCompletedSquamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and NeckCzech Republic
-
Quovadis AssociazioneAbbottNot yet recruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Esophageal Perforation | Esophageal Fistula